21 recensioni
"It has some very good London exteriors showing WWII bombed out building, streets, and vintage cars but that's about it," notes another reviewer here, and that sums up "Escape Route". I watched it mainly for the nostalgia of the outdoor scenes in London, especially close to the Thames. The plot isn't too bad, though I wasn't convinced by Rossi's ploy to publicise his arrival in London - would the police have really plastered photographs everywhere of an American who had slipped through Immigration? And what happened to the taxi driver whom Rossi told to wait when he checked out the first address. There was no sign of him when Rossi left the building and walked off.
Raft was 51 when this film was released and looked it, despite wearing the toupee that can be discerned in shots of the back of his head. When a it wasn't a stuntman doing some of the more athletic scenes, Raft still looked clumsy and some of the punches were all too obviously "pulled".
Raft was 51 when this film was released and looked it, despite wearing the toupee that can be discerned in shots of the back of his head. When a it wasn't a stuntman doing some of the more athletic scenes, Raft still looked clumsy and some of the punches were all too obviously "pulled".
- Marlburian
- 30 gen 2016
- Permalink
Airplane engineers are being snatched off the street, so George Raft, an airplane designer, flies to London to take up Clifford Evans' job offer, only first he has to find him. This leads him to Sally Gray, who turns out to be working for British Intelligence. They start pursuing Evans together.
This is a rote movie and everyone seems to be putting in just enough energy to collect their paychecks. The script starts and stops for no clear reason, as bad guys try to kill Raft and then leave after the first attempt fails; a bad guy takes a swing at Raft, misses by several inches, and Raft falls down. The entire production is run in such a sloppy, uncaring manner that the viewer must be similarly unengaged.
There is some decent inadvertent documentary work in the site location; as Raft and Miss Gray wander about London, there are some nice views of still unrepaired war damage. However, given the generally low level of excellence, that made me think the film makers were ripping off shots from THE THIRD MAN and NAKED CITY.
This was Sally Gray's first movie since 1949 and her last. She would retire from the movies to become Baroness Oranmore and Browne, Baroness Mereworth in a fifty-year marriage and live to be 91. It's a happy ending that satisfies me.
This is a rote movie and everyone seems to be putting in just enough energy to collect their paychecks. The script starts and stops for no clear reason, as bad guys try to kill Raft and then leave after the first attempt fails; a bad guy takes a swing at Raft, misses by several inches, and Raft falls down. The entire production is run in such a sloppy, uncaring manner that the viewer must be similarly unengaged.
There is some decent inadvertent documentary work in the site location; as Raft and Miss Gray wander about London, there are some nice views of still unrepaired war damage. However, given the generally low level of excellence, that made me think the film makers were ripping off shots from THE THIRD MAN and NAKED CITY.
This was Sally Gray's first movie since 1949 and her last. She would retire from the movies to become Baroness Oranmore and Browne, Baroness Mereworth in a fifty-year marriage and live to be 91. It's a happy ending that satisfies me.
This is no noir, and at least on my disc, the sound was not good.
Many actors post-war went to England and did a lot of these B movies, which are done with next to no budget. Among the actors who participated: Dennis O'Keefe, Robert Preston, Dane Clark, and Cesar Romero. I have to say they're fun and sometimes atmospheric.
This one, with George Raft, has some good atmosphere - bombed-out London and some nice interiors.
In the story, nuclear scientists are kidnapped and taken behind the Iron Curtain. An undercover FBI agent (Raft) and a British agent (Frederick Piper) are assigned to capture the kidnappers. Raft sneaks into the country, escaping immigration, in order to draw attention to himself so he would be seen as wanted and nonthreatening.
What winds up happening is that the British agent's assistant, played by Sally Gray, ends up with Raft as they track the kidnappers.
This is pretty ordinary stuff. I like both Gray and Raft. Raft had a real warmth about him when he was at Warners, but I think he's one actor who needed a good director. Here he's elegant but monotoned.
Just okay. Unfortunately, this was Sally Gray's last film. She was invited to go to Hollywood but instead married a Lord who was in the House of Lords, stayed married to him for 52 years, and never worked again. He was 100 when he died; she was 91.
The story goes that her stepson was a friend of John Lennon's and is the subject of "A Day in the Life of a Fool."
Many actors post-war went to England and did a lot of these B movies, which are done with next to no budget. Among the actors who participated: Dennis O'Keefe, Robert Preston, Dane Clark, and Cesar Romero. I have to say they're fun and sometimes atmospheric.
This one, with George Raft, has some good atmosphere - bombed-out London and some nice interiors.
In the story, nuclear scientists are kidnapped and taken behind the Iron Curtain. An undercover FBI agent (Raft) and a British agent (Frederick Piper) are assigned to capture the kidnappers. Raft sneaks into the country, escaping immigration, in order to draw attention to himself so he would be seen as wanted and nonthreatening.
What winds up happening is that the British agent's assistant, played by Sally Gray, ends up with Raft as they track the kidnappers.
This is pretty ordinary stuff. I like both Gray and Raft. Raft had a real warmth about him when he was at Warners, but I think he's one actor who needed a good director. Here he's elegant but monotoned.
Just okay. Unfortunately, this was Sally Gray's last film. She was invited to go to Hollywood but instead married a Lord who was in the House of Lords, stayed married to him for 52 years, and never worked again. He was 100 when he died; she was 91.
The story goes that her stepson was a friend of John Lennon's and is the subject of "A Day in the Life of a Fool."
This is being advertised as part of a film noir collection. Its is definitely not noir. It is a cheap B&W second run British post-war espionage mystery. It has some very good London exteriors showing WWII bombed out building, streets, and vintage cars but that's about it. George Raft is his usual upright, erect, suave self and the story is hokey, naturally there is a female romantic interest thrown in as usual formula but it is not objectionable or at all a waste of time, it's a good display of a has-been American actor on the cheap to a a thrifty British production and that's all. It is watchable, you don't want to turn it off, so see it for what it is without any high expectations.
- BILLYBOY-10
- 14 gen 2009
- Permalink
Have been watching quite a few of the films presented by TCM in the latest retrospective of George Raft's films. and am amused by many of the reviews critical of the quality of the films. Yes, they are dated, corny, not well-plotted in some cases and Raft is not a very good actor -- in fact he is quite stiff and only seems to move with any grace when he is dancing.
But he is fun to watch and in this film, as in many others in this latest series on TCM, you see what audiences found appealing about Raft -- he is always very cool and virtually expressionless regardless of the circumstances and his backstory including his friendship with mobsters is right out of The Godfather.
Escape Route is a low budget quickie with ageing US star George Raft as Steve Rossi.
Rossi shows up in London, skipping the immigration queue and looking for an old friend called Grand.
Grand is elusive and wants to stay that way. Rossi is in fact a FBI agent who is investigating a gang kidnapping western scientists and taking them to Eastern Europe. Rossi teams up with the British secret service agent Joan Miller (Sally Gray) to apprehend Grand.
Raft looks a bit stiff and the romance with his younger star Sally Gray looks a bit ikky.
The film is ponderous, the title of the movie makes no sense. It is efficient but the plot seems all over the place with no tension or thrills.
Rossi shows up in London, skipping the immigration queue and looking for an old friend called Grand.
Grand is elusive and wants to stay that way. Rossi is in fact a FBI agent who is investigating a gang kidnapping western scientists and taking them to Eastern Europe. Rossi teams up with the British secret service agent Joan Miller (Sally Gray) to apprehend Grand.
Raft looks a bit stiff and the romance with his younger star Sally Gray looks a bit ikky.
The film is ponderous, the title of the movie makes no sense. It is efficient but the plot seems all over the place with no tension or thrills.
- Prismark10
- 31 lug 2019
- Permalink
- michaelRokeefe
- 11 feb 2017
- Permalink
Another quota quickie British film of the fifties. This is one of literally hundreds of films that had an American actor in the leading role purely as a way of getting a release in the USA.
George Raft stars as an FBI agent sent over to Britain to find out how, why and where leading scientists are being abducted and taken East.
Raft, obviously at the twilight of his career, looks a little bored with the whole thing. Judging by his square shoulders, he seems to have left his coat hanger in his overcoat and his arms seem to be glued to his sides. His leading lady, quite a bit younger than him, also seems uneasy of smooching an older man!
Using schoolboy spy techniques they uncover the spy ring and Raft gets the girl. An undemanding film that passes the short running time.
George Raft stars as an FBI agent sent over to Britain to find out how, why and where leading scientists are being abducted and taken East.
Raft, obviously at the twilight of his career, looks a little bored with the whole thing. Judging by his square shoulders, he seems to have left his coat hanger in his overcoat and his arms seem to be glued to his sides. His leading lady, quite a bit younger than him, also seems uneasy of smooching an older man!
Using schoolboy spy techniques they uncover the spy ring and Raft gets the girl. An undemanding film that passes the short running time.
- The-Other-Monkey
- 29 set 2005
- Permalink
I'm pretty old but George Raft was before even my time. What was his appeal? How did he ever get a movie role?
The wooden Raft is not helped here by an incoherent plot and the random music behind many scenes. I saw the colorized version so most people had blue hands and ears and all cars were a shiny brown. The condition of the copy I saw on Youtube was excellent otherwise. All the dialog was clearly audible and no scenes were too dark to see anything. This is more than you can say for many old potboilers.
So why bother to review this movie? Why bother to watch it? SALLY GREY of course! I had just watched a couple of Hugh Sinclair "Saint" movies ("The Saint Takes a Vacation" and "The Saint in London") where she is just gorgeous and exudes an energetic charm. This movie is ten years later but Sally has still got "it".
In both the Saint movies and this one she is saddled with wooden co-stars. In the Saint movies her lively character perks things up a bit. There's not much hope of that here.
Having said all that, the movie is watchable, if you suspend your disbelief. All the cast are perfectly fine and the dialog in most scenes is quite natural. If they had dropped the Commie spy angle and made it a straight police procedural it would have been better.
The wooden Raft is not helped here by an incoherent plot and the random music behind many scenes. I saw the colorized version so most people had blue hands and ears and all cars were a shiny brown. The condition of the copy I saw on Youtube was excellent otherwise. All the dialog was clearly audible and no scenes were too dark to see anything. This is more than you can say for many old potboilers.
So why bother to review this movie? Why bother to watch it? SALLY GREY of course! I had just watched a couple of Hugh Sinclair "Saint" movies ("The Saint Takes a Vacation" and "The Saint in London") where she is just gorgeous and exudes an energetic charm. This movie is ten years later but Sally has still got "it".
In both the Saint movies and this one she is saddled with wooden co-stars. In the Saint movies her lively character perks things up a bit. There's not much hope of that here.
Having said all that, the movie is watchable, if you suspend your disbelief. All the cast are perfectly fine and the dialog in most scenes is quite natural. If they had dropped the Commie spy angle and made it a straight police procedural it would have been better.
- charles-p-hall
- 15 gen 2024
- Permalink
In one of his Lippert Pictures George Raft shot this one in London where he plays an FBI agent on the trail of some scientists who've been kidnapped in various western countries and presumably taken to the Soviet Union to work for the other side. To accomplish his mission Raft has to team up with Sally Gray of British Intelligence who is both pretty and useful.
By that I mean anyone who could reverse a custody situation and get George Raft in a hammerlock has to be a girl you can get serious about when the mission is completed.
Even though the film isn't quite 80 minutes it moves along at a ponderous pace. Raft looked bored throughout the film, his paycheck must have cleared and he was going through the motions. His days as a top star were over and he was reduced to Poverty Row Lippert Pictures to get enough money to pay that huge tax bill Uncle Sam was smacking him with.
Clifford Evans as the mastermind of the kidnappings had some interesting moments. But the film is definitely mediocre.
By that I mean anyone who could reverse a custody situation and get George Raft in a hammerlock has to be a girl you can get serious about when the mission is completed.
Even though the film isn't quite 80 minutes it moves along at a ponderous pace. Raft looked bored throughout the film, his paycheck must have cleared and he was going through the motions. His days as a top star were over and he was reduced to Poverty Row Lippert Pictures to get enough money to pay that huge tax bill Uncle Sam was smacking him with.
Clifford Evans as the mastermind of the kidnappings had some interesting moments. But the film is definitely mediocre.
- bkoganbing
- 29 lug 2013
- Permalink
This is actually quite a reasonably paced little cold war thriller. It sees FBI man George Raft ("Rossi") and his British counterpart "Sally" (Joan Miller) seek to get to the bottom of a mystery involving the disappearance of several high-level nuclear scientists. The plot is pretty procedural; it is clear from early on whom the perpetrator is, but their pursuit of him and of his captives is quite well produced, scripted and though maybe it does lack much of any sense of peril, it is still an enjoyable enough afternoon feature that proves Raft had some degree of versatility. You are unlikely to recall it afterwards, but it does it's job for 80 minutes.
- CinemaSerf
- 23 feb 2023
- Permalink
- planktonrules
- 6 ott 2008
- Permalink
George Raft was possibly the dullest of all established Hollywood stars, like a wooden dummy with a deep bass grating voice, a totally expressionless face never moving or betraying any human feelings, stone cold and usually in very unsympathetic roles. What saves this film is Sally Field, prominent in many films, here slightly past her prime, and it is hard to understand why she should fall for such an unlikeable statue. What saves the film even more is the wonderful sceneries of London, you see all London from only most favourable aspects actually bringing out the very character of London, and for this only the film is worth watching. The story isn't bad but rather artificial, you never learn anything about the other vanished scientists, so it is a rather cheap cloak-and-dagger intrigue with some exciting moments, chases and fisticuffs, but it is definitely not watchable for the sake of George Raft.
I've seen Raft in many movies, and just don't get why people liked him so much. His acting is wooden, not just here, but in many roles. He's not particularly handsome nor charismatic. But whatever.
I like this movie because it's what we yanks consider a hollywood genre, but set and shot in the UK. It's refreshing to see a procedural done in another country. Similar, but different. And plenty of on location and street shots, not just endless soundstages. The camerawork even has a few imaginative moments.
But it's not special in any other way. I'm pretty good with british acting names and faces, and I don't recognize one here. It's rare that I recognize only one performer in a movie, in this case, Raft. I didn't previously know Sally Gray. I found it hard not to watch her. To me she looks much more american than british for that time period.
This could be a good movie for an update, a remake. It's got good bones.
I like this movie because it's what we yanks consider a hollywood genre, but set and shot in the UK. It's refreshing to see a procedural done in another country. Similar, but different. And plenty of on location and street shots, not just endless soundstages. The camerawork even has a few imaginative moments.
But it's not special in any other way. I'm pretty good with british acting names and faces, and I don't recognize one here. It's rare that I recognize only one performer in a movie, in this case, Raft. I didn't previously know Sally Gray. I found it hard not to watch her. To me she looks much more american than british for that time period.
This could be a good movie for an update, a remake. It's got good bones.
- movieswithgreg
- 24 ago 2020
- Permalink
- mark.waltz
- 13 apr 2014
- Permalink
George Raft made a lot of poor decisions about his career.As a result his career was going down the drain,and Bogart who was the beneficiary was an international star.He is about 15years to old for the role.In the climax he is totally incapable of making a fight look realistic.He clearly ducks away from a Haymarket.On the descending lift he is clearly only present in close up with the process screen behind him.He was like many actors of his era who became totally lost without the benefit of a studio contract.George Raft would of course become person's non Grata in the UK because of his mob connections.I recall working in a legal office who appealed,unsuccessfully,to the Home Office about this.
- malcolmgsw
- 21 dic 2015
- Permalink
As some other reviewers on here have noted, ESCAPE ROUTE is something of a lacklustre effort considering the talent which has gone into the production. It's one of those British B-films which features a washed-up American star who some might say is slumming it in his part. This time around it's George Raft who gives a particularly bored and wooden performance as an American investigator who arrives on British shores searching for the men who have kidnapped some nuclear scientists.
Yep, it's another thriller that utilises Cold War tensions as a backdrop for its story, but ESCAPE ROUTE is a staged and rather dull entry in the genre. There are no plot ingredients in this one to be remembered more than a couple of hours after watching. There's a lot of interviewing, a lot of chasing around, a lot of people being driven places in cars, and a lot of padding with pursuing police and the like. The plot is faintly ridiculous as it sees Raft skipping customs and thus being the subject of a massive manhunt just for being an illegal alien, hardly high stakes.
Raft's love interest is about half his age and the actress playing her couldn't be more obviously disinterested. The only actor of note is Clifford Evans playing a stock role with which he was more than familiar. The direction was by American B-movie exponent Seymour Friedman with help from Peter Graham Scott, a man best known for later directing and producing kid's TV shows in the 1970s.
Yep, it's another thriller that utilises Cold War tensions as a backdrop for its story, but ESCAPE ROUTE is a staged and rather dull entry in the genre. There are no plot ingredients in this one to be remembered more than a couple of hours after watching. There's a lot of interviewing, a lot of chasing around, a lot of people being driven places in cars, and a lot of padding with pursuing police and the like. The plot is faintly ridiculous as it sees Raft skipping customs and thus being the subject of a massive manhunt just for being an illegal alien, hardly high stakes.
Raft's love interest is about half his age and the actress playing her couldn't be more obviously disinterested. The only actor of note is Clifford Evans playing a stock role with which he was more than familiar. The direction was by American B-movie exponent Seymour Friedman with help from Peter Graham Scott, a man best known for later directing and producing kid's TV shows in the 1970s.
- Leofwine_draca
- 16 ago 2016
- Permalink
The Soviets have been kidnapping scientists from all over the world. FBI agent Steve Rossi (George Raft) sneaks into England to try to infiltrate the kidnapping ring. He is captured by MI5 agent Joan Miller and she joins his mission.
This is a British espionage thriller. There isn't much thrilling. There is not much action to speak of other than a slow ride down an elevator. The elevator is more interesting than the fight. There is no great spy craft. It's a lot of static talking with intermittent moments of something possibly interesting. It's not enough.
This is a British espionage thriller. There isn't much thrilling. There is not much action to speak of other than a slow ride down an elevator. The elevator is more interesting than the fight. There is no great spy craft. It's a lot of static talking with intermittent moments of something possibly interesting. It's not enough.
- SnoopyStyle
- 19 set 2020
- Permalink
A dreary plot made worse by the acting of George Raft - he not only gives a one note performance - he speaks entirely on one pitch - but even worse that that - are his boxing skills
it's difficult to believe that he was a prize fighter when he was young - it is easy to believe he was bad at it - and quit after a short career - his record hasn't been published anywhere - probably out of shame
while this movie was filmed in england - there are almost no familiar names and faces among the british cast - which is worrisome - next time - don't let the talented ones read the script first
i'm unfamiliar with Sally Gray - she was quite beautiful - she was in her late 30s in this film but looked younger - which made the 14 year age gap between her and Raft seem wider
i can't think of a single compelling reason to watch this - i wish someone had warned me like this.
it's difficult to believe that he was a prize fighter when he was young - it is easy to believe he was bad at it - and quit after a short career - his record hasn't been published anywhere - probably out of shame
while this movie was filmed in england - there are almost no familiar names and faces among the british cast - which is worrisome - next time - don't let the talented ones read the script first
i'm unfamiliar with Sally Gray - she was quite beautiful - she was in her late 30s in this film but looked younger - which made the 14 year age gap between her and Raft seem wider
i can't think of a single compelling reason to watch this - i wish someone had warned me like this.
This kind of movies made in the late forties and early fifties, during the Red Hunt period, more or less spy - espionage - and action flicks are quite forgettable for me. They are all alike. George Raft played in many of those supposed to be film noirs, with always the villians - evil Communists or former Nazis - and the good hero who wins in the end. Little action, predictable plot, when you have seen one, you have seen all of them. And the director Seymour Friedman, whom I have always confounded with Lee Sholem, was the perfect second grade yes man director for grade B movies. Both provided agreeable time wasters for gem diggers only. But here, second rate gem.
- searchanddestroy-1
- 23 ago 2023
- Permalink