Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaBurt, former Marine, haunted by his wartime trauma, struggles with mental illness. His girlfriend hopes his family will help his recovery, but they hesitate due to their young children. Can ... Leggi tuttoBurt, former Marine, haunted by his wartime trauma, struggles with mental illness. His girlfriend hopes his family will help his recovery, but they hesitate due to their young children. Can Burt overcome his demons and find a path forward?Burt, former Marine, haunted by his wartime trauma, struggles with mental illness. His girlfriend hopes his family will help his recovery, but they hesitate due to their young children. Can Burt overcome his demons and find a path forward?
Nancy Reagan
- Betty Hopke
- (as Nancy Davis)
Harry Baum
- Man at Dance
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Chet Brandenburg
- Man at Dance
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Edward Clark
- Larkin
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Gene Coogan
- Man at Dance
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Michael Dugan
- Attendant
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Ken DuMain
- Man at Dance
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Charles Ferguson
- Man at Dance
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Ben Hall
- Man at Dance
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensioni in evidenza
The main interest point in seeing 'Shadow in the Sky' was the subject matter, post traumatic stress disorder was a very brave topic to explore back then and was not done on film back then. It still is a brave topic to discuss now, now that it is even more common. Another interest point for me too was Ralph Meeker, here in a type of role with characteristics that he did incredibly well. Have always loved classic film and admire any film etc that covers tough subjects.
'Shadow in the Sky' is an interesting, thoughtful and very well intentioned film with a good deal to admire. A shame that it was a box office disaster at the time. It did fall short of full potential though, as not everything comes off great and it could have done a good deal more with the subject. While it's handled tactfully and sincerely, it could have had a good deal more depth as it is on the sketchy side. 'Shadow in the Sky' is definitely worth a look and am glad that it was watched, but it is one of those appreciate rather than love films.
Meeker is excellent in an intelligent and intensely moving performance. James Whitmore's performance is also powerful and Nancy Reagan is suitably sympathetic. Found myself really caring for their nicely fleshed out characters and caring for what happens to them. Fed M Wilcox directs with some nice atmosphere and sensitively, even with little innovative on display. The film looks quite good, clearly made with care, especially the suitably unsettling photography that sometimes has a surreal quality that is quite enticing.
Have always liked Bronislau Kaper and the score provided for 'Shadow in the Sky' is haunting without being overwrought. There is thoughtfulness in the script and the story is compelling enough with moments that move and frighten.
Do have to agree though that the script is patchy, with too much of an over-reliance of over-heated melodrama later on and while it raises some good points and questions the subject of PTSD was just not delved into enough, it never goes skin deep and while it would have been an education at the time judging the film now there is not enough that is insightful or illuminating. Meaning that while it is moving, it is not quite uncompromising enough.
Pacing isn't always there too, with too much padding and some of it is overlong and not necessary. The hospital dance agreed is completely superfluous. As a result, some of the film drags. While 'Shadow in the Sky' starts off really promisingly, one really tastes the soap suds quite bitterly in the final act. There are some strange character behaviours, especially those of the nephew, especially those that lack any kind of logic.
In summary, worth a look but could have been more. 6/10.
'Shadow in the Sky' is an interesting, thoughtful and very well intentioned film with a good deal to admire. A shame that it was a box office disaster at the time. It did fall short of full potential though, as not everything comes off great and it could have done a good deal more with the subject. While it's handled tactfully and sincerely, it could have had a good deal more depth as it is on the sketchy side. 'Shadow in the Sky' is definitely worth a look and am glad that it was watched, but it is one of those appreciate rather than love films.
Meeker is excellent in an intelligent and intensely moving performance. James Whitmore's performance is also powerful and Nancy Reagan is suitably sympathetic. Found myself really caring for their nicely fleshed out characters and caring for what happens to them. Fed M Wilcox directs with some nice atmosphere and sensitively, even with little innovative on display. The film looks quite good, clearly made with care, especially the suitably unsettling photography that sometimes has a surreal quality that is quite enticing.
Have always liked Bronislau Kaper and the score provided for 'Shadow in the Sky' is haunting without being overwrought. There is thoughtfulness in the script and the story is compelling enough with moments that move and frighten.
Do have to agree though that the script is patchy, with too much of an over-reliance of over-heated melodrama later on and while it raises some good points and questions the subject of PTSD was just not delved into enough, it never goes skin deep and while it would have been an education at the time judging the film now there is not enough that is insightful or illuminating. Meaning that while it is moving, it is not quite uncompromising enough.
Pacing isn't always there too, with too much padding and some of it is overlong and not necessary. The hospital dance agreed is completely superfluous. As a result, some of the film drags. While 'Shadow in the Sky' starts off really promisingly, one really tastes the soap suds quite bitterly in the final act. There are some strange character behaviours, especially those of the nephew, especially those that lack any kind of logic.
In summary, worth a look but could have been more. 6/10.
Strange little domestic drama concerning ex-soldier Ralph Meeker's attempts to readjust to civilian life many years after the war. Generally happy and normal, he can't handle rain, as it serves as a frightening reminder of the rain-soaked conditions he was constantly exposed to during one particularly brutal war time stint.
An extremely handsome looking movie, I was surprised at how the director, Fred Wilcox, composed so many of his shots in such a glistening, almost immaculate way. There always seems to be a lot going on inside the frame. It's visually exciting, almost experimental at times, a novel choice for this subject matter. There's one almost David Lynch-ian scene where Meeker is making an important phone call, and the little daughter is playing in the background, wandering through the house with a bag over her head saying "Give me some eyes. Give me some eyes". Filmed in a dream-like, consciously artistic way, it's quite odd.
All the performances are fine, especially James Whitmore's. He nails the big scene at the end, even though the important revelation about Meeker is sort of a dud. The film is also noteworthy in that it contains two well written women's roles. Nancy Davis plays a loving housewife and mother, but she's complicated and rounded out in a way that most women in these sorts of films around this time weren't allowed to be. And Jean Hagen plays a difficult, rather confounding mental hospital nurse who falls in love with Meeker. Frankly, their whole relationship felt a little confused and hurried but at least Hagen was not the typical angelic girlfriend.
This is a pretty intelligent, realistic and sensitively handled examination of mental illness. And it achieves the somewhat remarkable effect (almost as if it were a horror film) of portraying the simple event of rainfall as something sinister and threatening - its occurrence to be feared not just by Meeker's character but by all those who care about him as well.
An extremely handsome looking movie, I was surprised at how the director, Fred Wilcox, composed so many of his shots in such a glistening, almost immaculate way. There always seems to be a lot going on inside the frame. It's visually exciting, almost experimental at times, a novel choice for this subject matter. There's one almost David Lynch-ian scene where Meeker is making an important phone call, and the little daughter is playing in the background, wandering through the house with a bag over her head saying "Give me some eyes. Give me some eyes". Filmed in a dream-like, consciously artistic way, it's quite odd.
All the performances are fine, especially James Whitmore's. He nails the big scene at the end, even though the important revelation about Meeker is sort of a dud. The film is also noteworthy in that it contains two well written women's roles. Nancy Davis plays a loving housewife and mother, but she's complicated and rounded out in a way that most women in these sorts of films around this time weren't allowed to be. And Jean Hagen plays a difficult, rather confounding mental hospital nurse who falls in love with Meeker. Frankly, their whole relationship felt a little confused and hurried but at least Hagen was not the typical angelic girlfriend.
This is a pretty intelligent, realistic and sensitively handled examination of mental illness. And it achieves the somewhat remarkable effect (almost as if it were a horror film) of portraying the simple event of rainfall as something sinister and threatening - its occurrence to be feared not just by Meeker's character but by all those who care about him as well.
"Shadow in the Sky" is a fascinating film because it talks about something practically no film talked about at that time--Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Back then, the only other film that I can think of that dealt with it at all was "The Men"--but this was much more about the physical difficulties injured men face after the war. Here, while Ralph Meeker looks normal, he isn't. And in situations that remind him of the hell he lived through in the Pacific, he becomes a nervous bowl of goo. But, to make this much more interesting, the film focuses much of its energy on his family--a sister (Nancy Davis) and brother-in-law (James Whitmore) who are uncomfortable and cowardly when it comes to accepting him into their home after his very lengthy stay in the hospital. In fact, you really dislike the pair--especially the sister, as her own fears seem much stronger than her love for her brother. A fascinating and VERY unique film I can't recommend strongly enough. My only reservation, and it's a small one, is that sometimes the characters behave a bit strangely--in particular, Meeker's nephew--who is just plain bizarre!
Thoughtful (if not particularly incisive) look at mental illness in veterans brought on by their war experiences after suffering extreme duress in the midst of battle. One emotional Marine, recuperating at a hospital in southern California, is deemed well enough to leave, but his sister and brother-in-law (whose life the soldier saved overseas) are reluctant to take him in because of his volatile nature. Excellent performances from Ralph Meeker, Nancy Davis, and James Whitmore nearly compensate for Ben Maddow's sketchy screenplay which begins as a study of human frailties but soon becomes a family melodrama (its subject matter whittled down to one case). Thus, scenes such as a dance at the Veteran's Hospital serve no real purpose, with the viewer left in the uncomfortable position of waiting for Meeker's Marine to lose self-control. Nevertheless, an unusual product to come from MGM, with several taut and moving sequences--though not enough to quite fill its running-time. **1/2 from ****
Earnest little movie that's almost a sleeper, thanks to a solid cast, good production values, and an affecting story. Ex-Marine Burt (Meeker) is in a VA hospital suffering from periodic bouts of battle shock, especially when it rains. Meanwhile, his solid citizen sister Betty (Davis) and her husband Lou (Whitmore) live close by. Burt wants to get out of the confinement and move in with them. But Betty and Lou have two kids and are wary that the unpredictable Burt may prove a live-in hazard. The predicament is compounded by the fact that Burt saved Lou's life during the war, thus Lou has an obligation. So how these various threads get resolved forms the core of the plot.
Hats off to glamorous MGM for foregoing the usual glitz with location filming and a sturdy, if non-glamorous cast. Whatever her politics, Davis-Reagan was a fine actress, excelling at everyday roles, while Meeker at this stage was a Brando-type, though here he calibrates in non-emoting fashion. Of course, Whitmore is Whitmore, looking like an everyday guy as the role requires. Together, they make this story of post-war wounds both affecting and believable, even if in a Hollywood manner. I especially like the rapport between Burt and Lou, which ultimately relies on the male bonding so common among men in battle. Understandably, there were a number of these war trauma films made during this period. However, this obscure little B-film can hold its own even among the bigger boys.
Hats off to glamorous MGM for foregoing the usual glitz with location filming and a sturdy, if non-glamorous cast. Whatever her politics, Davis-Reagan was a fine actress, excelling at everyday roles, while Meeker at this stage was a Brando-type, though here he calibrates in non-emoting fashion. Of course, Whitmore is Whitmore, looking like an everyday guy as the role requires. Together, they make this story of post-war wounds both affecting and believable, even if in a Hollywood manner. I especially like the rapport between Burt and Lou, which ultimately relies on the male bonding so common among men in battle. Understandably, there were a number of these war trauma films made during this period. However, this obscure little B-film can hold its own even among the bigger boys.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThis film was a major disaster at the box office despite its low cost, losing $644,000 (over $7.6M in 2024) for MGM according to studio records. It did so poorly it didn't even make back its negative cost, let alone expenses for duplication, distribution and advertising.
- BlooperIn a long shot of the rocking boat at night in the rain, the film suddenly runs backwards (notice the waves).
- ConnessioniFeatured in Los Angeles Plays Itself (2003)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Come Again Some Other Day
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 787.000 USD (previsto)
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 18 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Shadow in the Sky (1952) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi