Recensioni degli utenti

Conflict stars Humphrey Bogart as architect Richard Mason, not in love with his wife (Rose Hobart) and infatuated with her sister Alexis (Evelyn Turner) Events soon take a sinister turn, when Richard hatches a plot to murder his wife on a remote mountain road. Just when he thinks he has committed the perfect crime, things start to happen which plant seeds of doubt in his mind.

Sydney Greenstreet gives a fine performance as a psychologist friend of the Masons who offers useful insights into the criminal mind and gives you food for thought as he voices his opinion on the human psyche.

With good performances all round, this is an atmospheric mystery which will keep you guessing to the end.

...but it isn't really that unusual if you consider the films Bogart made after "High Sierra" and he began to get meatier film roles instead of the one-note gangster roles Warner Brothers often put him into from 1936 until 1941. Bogart was quite a versatile actor to put it mildly, and this film showcases yet another side of his talents.

Bogart plays Richard Mason, an engineer who is celebrating his fifth wedding anniversary with his wife Kathryn (Rose Hobart). However, Richard and Kathryn have been snapping at each other for the last few weeks. In a bit of a showdown before attending their anniversary party, Richard admits that he is in love with Kathryn's sister Evelyn, and Kathryn admits her short temper has been because she realizes this. Kathryn also states that she would never agree to a divorce. Realize that Evelyn (Alexis Smith) is innocent in all of this as Richard has been worshiping her from afar.

That night, on the way back from their anniversary party, Richard is gazing at Evelyn through the rear view mirror and has an automobile accident as a result of not paying attention to the road. Evelyn and Kathryn are unharmed, but Richard has broken his leg. Richard uses this injury, and the fact that no doctor can be sure at what point he'll regain the use of his leg, to come up with a rather clever scheme for killing his wife. After recovering his mobility, he continues to behave as though incapacitated. With everyone believing him immobilized by his injury, he intercepts his wife's car on a remote mountain road, blocking the road with his own car. He kills his wife and then sends the car off a cliff with Kathryn inside. A large group of logs go off the cliff with the car making a kind of eery formation on top of it and obscuring the wreck. The car does not catch fire.

Now all Richard has to do is go back to town undetected, still playing the cripple, and now playing the worried husband as well when his wife does not reach her destination. With Evelyn at his side to provide moral support, his plan is to wait for the alerted state police to find his wife's car and thus her body. Then he'll be free to court Evelyn. However, there is one snag - the police never find Kathryn's body or her car. On top of that, Kathryn's things that were with her when she died are showing up one by one - in Richard's desk, in his bedroom, in his luggage when he goes on a trip. The scent of Kathryn's perfume fills their room one night. He even sees someone who is dressed just like his wife on the street one day and follows her - she disappears into thin air. Whatever is going on here? Was Kathryn unharmed in this second accident as well? Is she playing with him? Unlike most mysteries, this one is not something that needs to be explained to the audience at the end, although it is. If you watch the film closely enough you'll figure out exactly what happened before it starts happening - but you have to pay attention. Highly recommended.

This may not be one of Bogart's best, in fact not even close to his best....but his pairing with Sidney Greenstreet makes it worth watching. There is something magical about the manner in which these two actors mesh that is seldom seen in film. Bogart is Bogart, always the tight lipped hero or villain with the clipped speech and slight chip on his shoulder. Greenstreet is the jolly fat man who hides behind that facade, either evil or cunning or both. Two actors with different personas which play perfectly against each other. They are seldom on the same side and although initially, in this film, they appear to be, the tables turn as the film progresses. The story is not a new one....man kills wife...or so he thinks....is she dead or isn't she? The ending is fairly predictable but it still holds your interest. Alexis Smith, as the target of Bogart's affections, is tall, coldly beautiful and rather detached....she does not seem vulnerable enough and can't seem to make up her mind about her feelings for Bogart's character. Watch this film for the exchanges between Bogart and Greenstreet...that's what it is all about. They make the rest of it worthwhile.

This movie and the above named movie were both made in 1945 (though The Two Mrs. Carrolls was released two years later), both starred Humphrey Bogart and Alexis Smith, and both had a plot involving a man who had murdered his wife. In fact, they are so similar that I had mixed the two films together in my mind. However, I recently watched both films just a few nights apart and found Conflict to be the better of the two films, though neither are great films. However, considering that an okay Bogart film of the 1940s is still very watchable, this shouldn't discourage you from seeing the film. The problem, I'm sure, for many is that both films are so against type for Bogey that you may feel turned off by his character. Plus, the plot is awfully hard to believe. BUT, if you suspend belief and just watch it for its entertainment value, this is a good film--particularly for the fine supporting performance by Sidney Greenstreet.

Film-noirs/mysteries have always fascinated me, and there are numerous good films to classics. Ones that are impeccably made, tautly scripted, well acted, entertaining and suspenseful. Another interest point is the always seldom less than watchable Humphrey Bogart, one of film's most iconic stars (and deservedly too), evident in particularly one of the greatest screen performances in 'Casablanca'. Sydney Greenstreet is also always dependable and a bright spot in much of his work.

Would never have heard of 'Conflict' if it had not appeared in my recommended for you section, and although it is not a great film as such there are no regrets having watched it. It's good fun and has an appropriate darkness and engrosses, even if it doesn't surprise. It has been compared here to 'The Two Mrs Carrolls', a relatively similar film made in the same period and also starring Bogart, and can see why. Do agree though that this is the much better film, having not cared for the rather bizarre 'The Two Mrs Carrolls'.

Bogart holds 'Conflict' together with ease and intensity and the main reason to see it, the role suits him very well even if it's not one of his best. Greenstreet is every bit as great, subtle and also typically imperious. The exchanges between them blister, with them gelling so well despite being polar opposites. The film is nicely directed and never felt dull. The music serves its purpose well.

'Conflict' is a good looking film, with suitably brooding and stylish photography in particular. The script is taut enough and while the story is flawed it has two diverting enough mysteries that keeps one on their toes, a nice dark tension in its mood and a few suitably unsettling sequences.

Some suspension of disbelief is needed though, as the film does get contrived and silly at times, and neither mystery has enough surprises. The conclusion especially is very obvious and also felt anti-climactic.

Also felt to a lesser extent felt that Alexis Smith came over as rather detached in her role.

In conclusion, good fun and fans of Bogart should find enough to enjoy. 7/10

This is an obvious though very entertaining film with a cast that includes the radiant Alexis Smith, Sydney Greenstreet, and of course, the star, Humphrey Bogart at his sinister best. He plays an unhappily married man who is in love with his wife's sister (Smith). Greenstreet is a friend of the family.

Considering the circumstances of his death, it's always disturbing to see Humphrey Bogart with cigarettes, and if he's not smoking in this, he's lining them up in his cigarette case.

Mystery loving audiences will pick up the all-important clue immediately. Whether you do or don't, it's hard not to enjoy the most standard of films with a cast like this. As an added kick, the film has a psychological feature to it, which started to become all the rage toward the end of WWII.

I remember seeing the film "Conflict" on video back in the early 1990s when the film was part of a Humphrey Bogart collection. My brother warned me that "Conflict" was only a standard film and he was right. The plot and everything else about the film is only routine. It is one of those films where everyone concerned is just going through the motions. Bogart has a strong leading lady in Alexis Smith, she made some good films and was a very capable performer. Sidney Greenstreet offers more solid support in yet another Bogart vehicle and is cast as a decent character for a change. It helps that the film is only on for 83 minutes, otherwise the story would lose all momentum. There isn't much of a twist to the tale, in spite of what some people may think. Watchable but nothing special.

Conflict is definitely a disturbing and horrifying psychological thriller. With it's maliciously unnerving mood and heavy, dismal cinematography, the film aspires to achieve an all-new level of anxiety.

It's about a guilt-ridden man - Humphrey Bogart's arguably most sinister role ever - who gradually plunges deeper and deeper into state of a devastating mental illness. Hinting at a thorough psychological evaluation in the beginning, Conflict analyzes how a fearless and brutal man - convinced that he's just killed his innocent wife - is trapped in a vortex of clues, which might lead to a mightily shocking revelation. The more observant viewers might already be able to uncover the whole mystery in the first act, but for those who are in desperate need of a satisfying and suspenseful intrigue Conflict brings a genuinely captivating mystery.

Sydney Greenstreet - with his usual charm, sophisticated mannerism, and most-cheerful laughter - plays the psychoanalyst and a friend to Mr. Bogart. The manner in which he exhibits his impeccable intelligence is the film's most-promising quality. And Bogart, with all his devilish attitude and increasing fear is as convincing (and as stylish and graceful) as he was in Casablanca or The Maltese Falcon.

Conflict is a lesser-known film noir, but it's crucial to note that its mightily clever and disquieting premise - along with a bunch of twisted and deranged sequences - delivers a seriously thrilling melodrama that's not to be argued with.

Over time you've grown desires more and more, and your heart is fired for your sister-in-law, but the wife won't let you go, why you've told her I don't know, in a crash you go and break one of your paws; the result leads to ideas packed full of malice, as you become completely heartless, rather callous, so you plan your wife's committal, by pretending you're a cripple, if she knew there'd be expletives and she'd cuss; all in all it's not the greatest film you've made, not the finest of all characters you've played, it's like you're going through the motions, hardly showing your emotions (although nothing new there), not even Sydney has the weight to give you aid.

Conflict is directed by Curtis Bernhardt and collectively written by Arthur T. Horman, Dwight Taylor, Robert Siodmak and Alfred Neumann. It stars Humphrey Bogart, Alexis Smith, Sydney Greenstreet, Rose Hobart, Charles Drake and Grant Mitchell. Music is by Frederick Hollander and cinematography by Merritt B. Gerstad.

Still under exposed after all these years, Conflict is deserving of reappraisals by the film noir crowd. Plot has Richard Mason (Bogart) stuck in a loveless marriage to Kathryn (Hobart), with his misery further compounded by the fact he's in love with his sister-in-law, Evelyn (Smith). Finally having enough, Richard murders his wife and intends to woo the younger Evelyn into his life. However, when Richard starts glimpsing his wife out in the city and little items of hers start turning up, Richard starts to doubt his own mind.

In essence it's a psychological thriller spiced with German Expressionism, perhaps unsurprising given that Bernhardt and Siodmak are key components of the production. The psychoanalysis angle played out would of course become a big feature in the film noir cycle, and here it makes for a most interesting story as Bernhardt and Gerstad dress it up in looming shadows, rain sodden streets and treacherous mountain roads. The pungent air of fatalism is evident throughout, the pace of the piece purposely sedate to marry up with the sombre tones as Richard Mason, a disturbed menace, him self becomes menaced.

OK, you don't have to be an ace detective to figure out just exactly what is going on, so the reveal at film's closure lacks a bit of a punch, but the atmospherically tinged journey is well worth undertaking regardless. Bernhardt's camera is often like some peeping tom spying on the warped machinations of Mason, and all the while Hollander adds thematically compliant music to proceedings. Bogart was pretty much press ganged into making the picture, but come the final product it's evident that even though he may have been unhappy initially, he ended up delivering one the most intriguing turns in his wonderful career.

Greenstreet is his usual presence, here playing the psychiatrist family friend who delivers the telling lines whilst being ahead of the game. Unfortunately the two principal lady characters aren't done any favours by the otherwise taut screenplay, especially Evelyn, who as the catalyst for the sinister shadings never gets chance to build a strong emotional bridge to Richard Mason's psychological make-up. Still, when you got Bogart as an unhinged killer attired in trench-coat and fedora, and a director who knows how to place him in the right visual scenarios, the flaws can't kill the film's strengths. 7/10

This is a solid film that will keep you guessing right up to the last minute; unless, of course, you are super sleuth. Sidney Greenstreet gives a delicious performance, as the rest of the cast, but it is bogey who does all the heavy lifting. Bogart's films are sharply divided into good guy and bad guy roles. I like him more as a good guy, just as I like Greenstreet more as a bad guy. Both reversed their screen personas for this one. (Although Bogey had quite a few heavy roles early in his career). Enjoy the ride, baby.

From what very-little I have read about this film,it seems that this whole project was a major headache for all involved. Bogie didn't want to do it,and only ended-up doing it under some pressure from the Warner studio heads. The film was made in 1943,and not released until 1945 due to legal disputes. Not a lot of films were made in the USA in 1943,making it special for that reason alone. In this film we get to see some interesting long-ago downtown scenes with all of the cars being pre-WW2 and looking shiny-brand-new,even in black and white.

Now,on to the movie !

I think the film is very-good.

I will try to be very general and try not to spoil or give-away any of the story here.

The acting is intense,the story is frightening and strange. But what exactly is the real story here ? The main-event that drives the whole film happens fast and it wasn't 100% clear,ie: there is some wiggle-room as to what exactly happened,a few far-fetched what-if's immediately will come to your mind.

To be honest,the film had me really wondering what the real-deal is until the very-end! We,the viewer,are forced to pick between two rather unlikely,(practical impossibilities) that might be driving the later events in this interesting drama. I thought it was a well-made and a very good film. Whatever the differences were that the actors and management had when making this film,everyone did a great job,they seemed to have put some of the emotional energy of their difficulties back into making the film and making it a good-one.

The writing,the cinematography/sets/ lighting,the direction and pacing,the acting,the soundtrack,all of it was top-notch without overdoing-it.

Check it out,and pay close attention to the details of this solid and engaging film,and tell us what YOU think please !🌞

Remarkable black and white; average crime drama. Police struggle to crack the alibi of a savvy wife-killer(Humphrey Bogart), who admits on his fifth wedding anniversary that he is in love with his wife's sister(Alexis Smith). Bogart begins to worry when he finds little signs that may indicate that his wife(Rose Hobart)is not dead after all. Very good support from Sydney Greenstreet.

"When I married you, your sister was just a kid. Now she's grown up and I happen to find myself in love with her. Just one of those things that can't be helped."

'Conflict' has a nice, lean plot, which I might have expected knowing that Robert Siodmak co-authored the original story (with Alfred Neumann). I love the dark elements, its atmosphere, and how it moves along. Bogart is great in all aspects of his role - frustrated husband, unrequited lover, stone-cold killer, and guilt-ridden guy whose grip on reality may be wavering. Sydney Greenstreet is solid as always too. Spotting the key slip-up is not hard and you can kind of see where it's going, but the possible variations on a theme make it so that it isn't all completely predictable, and there are some nice moments of tension. Fleshed out a little more this might have been a Hitchcock film, but as it is, it's a nice noir/suspense blend, and I really enjoyed it. They sure didn't put a lot of thought into the title though.

Not a bad Hitchcock style mystery/thriller at all. It's nothing major and it sort of goes through the motions setting up the rather familiar premise, but once film legends Bogart and Greenstreet start playing their little cat and mouse games, it becomes genuinely suspenseful. I found myself enjoying it quite a bit, though Bogart's benevolent change of heart regarding his obsession Alexis Smith made little sense. (This is compensated for, however, by one of those surprise endings that you sort of see coming but are surprised by anyway.)

This is one of Bogart's best movies. He could go either to hard bitten private detective Sam Spade or to paranoid types like the role he plays in this movie or what he did in Treasure of the Sierra Madre. Like most Hollywood movies, murder seems a bit unrealistic given the characters as they are written out and portrayed. But get by the murder and the contrived plot that follows, Bogart still is nothing less than fantastic in this movie. Alexis Smith's part as his wife's younger sister is another reason not to throw this film in as a minor and forgettable Bogart effort. Leave it to director Curtis Bernhardt, who was known for making "women"s films, to make a film that explores so well a man's infatuation and insecurity.

An architect (Humphrey Bogart) murders his nagging wife (Rose Hobart) in hopes he can be with her younger sister (Alexis Smith). After the murder things start to happen that make him question whether his wife is really dead after all.

Entertaining film despite a plot that's easy to get ahead of. It's helped by some good acting and decent direction. Similar in some ways to The Two Mrs. Carrolls, which also had Bogie plotting to kill his wife so he could marry Alexis Smith. Of the two movies, this is the better, helped largely by the presence of Sidney Greenstreet. Bogart also gives a less over the top performance here than in the other movie. Both films have something else in common: they both sat on the shelf for two years after filming before they were released.

There was nothing else on so I watched this movie to the end. Hard to believe it lasted do long, considering he must of drove past her a dozen times without stopping to look to see if she was still in the car. A relatively unknown Bogart movie, if you watch it you will understand why.