La nave senza nome

I'm intrigued by war movies, especially war movies within a country at war. This also happens to be my country, and in fact -- though I will never know the details -- my dad was in this action. This has the required swelling of patriotic fervor at the end, and does so with a minimum of racist demonization.

Its about the one really risky time in the war. There was never any doubt that the Germans (and Italians) would lose in Europe once the US entered the war; the only question was the cost. But in the Pacific, the situation was truly dire between Pearl Harbor and this battle. After this battle, it was a war of factories.

But before, it was touch and go. Everyone in the States would have known the pivotal role of the event and would have their stories about tactics and bravery.

There are three notable things about this movie.

The first is that it is nearly all wrong in terms of the history. The reason for this is that the US had broken the code (JN-25). This was not something that could be announced; the US knew the details of the Japanese plans and were able to stage an ambush. But that hardly explains the other, gratuitous historical inaccuracies. One can only think that no one cared what the actual tactics were as long as communal dedication was apparent.

A second rather shocking thing is that all the combat footage is genuine. These are real warriors in the real place, with less than half of the movie (obviously overlain) produced as a fiction. Looking at these men and operations deepens the experience, knowing how rare it is to see this before Vietnam.

But the most interesting to me is one character. He's pretty much the central character of the fiction: a torpedo plane pilot. Now picture this; you have a real story of national import around which history does swing. You have actual footage which in other, later, contexts with narration stands strong. You have all this and you want to insert Hollywood; what do you do?

Well, you insert a character who is a Hollywood actor, someone who has left Hollywood and enlisted but who still carries his Oscar on combat missions! Its yet another example of this phenomenon I call the narrative fold. Pretty cool.

Oh, the fictional parts are bad in nearly all respects, excepting one scene. An airman has been killed and his buddy is packing his effects for transport back to his girl. Going through things to place in a suitcase, he finds an empty tube of toothpaste and tosses it in the trash. Then he reconsiders -- a very poignant moment -- and pulls it out of the trash to send to the woman. Its one thing that works. All the rest would wait to be decoded.

Ted's Evaluation -- 2 of 3: Has some interesting elements.

It's 1944 and while the tide of war has turned in the direction of the Allied forces, the prospect of the invasion of Japan was still a deadly reality. Once again Hollywood did its part in the propaganda battle to bolster American morale. A Wing and a Prayer touched all the bases with studio stars, heroic sacrifices and plenty of action. I first saw this film as a kid in the 1950s and I still remember gripping my seat everytime a plane hit the carrier deck. Put into the context of the time it's a good film by a very good Director.

Three months after the greatest disaster in the american history with the surprise military strike of Pear Harbor by the imperial Japanese navy air service, December the 7th, 1941, the American HQ set up a desperate strategy based on a simulation of disarray within the American navy so that the Japanese confidence goes up artificially and incites them not to deviate from their supposed plan of campaign: to take ownership of Pearl Harbor, this objective implying beforehand a passage through Midway where the American navy is firmly waiting for the Japanese navy.

The film focuses on an aircraft carrier unexpectedly playing the role of a bait and we witness the daily life of these airmen forced to behave cowardly every time they meet a Japanese zero. The atmosphere is typical of old war movies: ultra-patriotic, childish and cheesy, pretty close to a propaganda film, in a certain manner. We globally remember the team spirit, the heroism of the airmen, the dignity of the entire crew and the excellent cinematography given the technical means of the time.

Henry Hathaway made many of the best Hollywood films, particularly in the genre of hard action, especially at war. This is one of them, still in the beginning of his age of greatness but an important prelude to what was to follow. The main star here is not Dana Andrews but Don Ameche, who plays a totally different role from his usual repertoire, but he does it more than well. Cedric Hardwicke is an unnamed admiral of only one scene in the beginning, and among the others is Charles Bickford, reliable and indomitable as usual, as the captain, with clenched teeth. The story is the build-up to the battle of Midway half a year after Pearl Harbour, which changed the course of the war to American advantage. The six months before the battle was a perpetual humiliation, the Americans constantly avoiding confrontations with the Japanese for strategic reasons, and the marines getting rather frustrated about it. When finally everything is ready for the battle, it is an immense release, and the humiliation of running the gauntlet turns to triumph. As usual in Hathaway's films, much attention and importance is attached to the human side of the drama, and many of the sailors make great individual performances with stories of their own. Some get grounded, some commit unpardonable goofs, there is some intimate music as well, and some run into martyrdom. In brief, it's an excellent almost documentary panorama of the drama leading up to Midway, and it's well worth while following every stage of it - with many U-turns on the way. But Don Ameche makes the greatest impression, although far from sympathetic and almost hated but profoundly reasonable all the way.

The Movie was shot on the back lot of 20th Century Fox. The studio used sailors from NAS Longbeach Ca. as extras for about 2 weeks . In the Scene when a Bomb hits the Ship i am the first man on the fire hose . They had built part of a Carrier Deck over a lake and used SBD'S on this deck for close ups but then used film footage from actual battle scene's in between . This explains difference of planes and ships.