VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,0/10
1608
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaMurder during film shoot sparks search for a killer.Murder during film shoot sparks search for a killer.Murder during film shoot sparks search for a killer.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Harold Waldridge
- Charlie
- (as Harold Waldrige)
King Baggot
- Al Payne
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Wilson Benge
- Café Henri Actor Doorman
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Phil Bloom
- Hood
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Eddie Boland
- Bill
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Morgan Brown
- Crew Member
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensioni in evidenza
Although it reunites Bela Lugosi, David Manners, and Edward Van Sloan, the noted stars of Universal's hit DRACULA from the year before, this Edward L. Marin picture shot at the Tiffany Studio for World Wide Pictures is not a horror film. Instead it is a nifty, fast-paced little murder-mystery set in a movie studio, with decent production values including exemplary cinematography and editing for such a low-budget ($50,000) production, along with competent, effective performances from a cast of a few name stars and countless Hollywood veterans, including a number of former silent stars past their prime who had become reduced to character roles and bit parts after the coming of sound. Showing up in notable bits are King Baggot, Ralph Lewis, Barbara Bedford, Spec O'Donnell, Mona Maris, and more
The plot gets off to an intriguing start with the sequence responsible for the film's title. In a fancy car outside a swanky hotel as people exit in dressy evening attire, a classy, attractive woman (Adrienne Ames) tells some gangsters that their mark is the man she's about to kiss. It all looks like an energetic Precode gangster film is about to begin. When the woman kisses the pleasantly confused man and walks off, he's immediately gunned down and the camera pans over to the director and crew filming the scene. The director (Edward Van Sloan) says it looked awful and needs a retake, but they quickly discover that the actor is actually dead from a gunshot wound and the mystery begins.
A young scenario writer who specializes in detective stories (David Manners) is eager to try solving the crime himself, especially since he's in love with the actress, who happens to be the main suspect because she's the ex-wife of the not very well-liked dead actor and is still his life insurance beneficiary. The police (John Wray and Wade Boteler) arrive and get on the case but naturally the screenwriter is always a step ahead of them, often assisted by the comical studio security cop (Vince Barnett). Bela Lugosi gets a chance for a straight dramatic role as a studio executive who like several other studio personnel and/or their spouses, also has motives for getting rid of the actor, a notorious ladies' man.
While it may often seem a routine who-done-it, the script cleverly sets up numerous red herrings and misleading clues, and provides enjoyable moments of Pre-code Prohibition-era banter, satiric Hollywood in-jokes, and cutesy comic shtick. Also, the location filming gives a revealing glimpse behind the scenes inside a real movie studio, not only sound stages but screening room, projection booth, dressing rooms, bungalows, garage, makeup and electrical departments, etc., that raise it above average interest for any film buffs.
The plot gets off to an intriguing start with the sequence responsible for the film's title. In a fancy car outside a swanky hotel as people exit in dressy evening attire, a classy, attractive woman (Adrienne Ames) tells some gangsters that their mark is the man she's about to kiss. It all looks like an energetic Precode gangster film is about to begin. When the woman kisses the pleasantly confused man and walks off, he's immediately gunned down and the camera pans over to the director and crew filming the scene. The director (Edward Van Sloan) says it looked awful and needs a retake, but they quickly discover that the actor is actually dead from a gunshot wound and the mystery begins.
A young scenario writer who specializes in detective stories (David Manners) is eager to try solving the crime himself, especially since he's in love with the actress, who happens to be the main suspect because she's the ex-wife of the not very well-liked dead actor and is still his life insurance beneficiary. The police (John Wray and Wade Boteler) arrive and get on the case but naturally the screenwriter is always a step ahead of them, often assisted by the comical studio security cop (Vince Barnett). Bela Lugosi gets a chance for a straight dramatic role as a studio executive who like several other studio personnel and/or their spouses, also has motives for getting rid of the actor, a notorious ladies' man.
While it may often seem a routine who-done-it, the script cleverly sets up numerous red herrings and misleading clues, and provides enjoyable moments of Pre-code Prohibition-era banter, satiric Hollywood in-jokes, and cutesy comic shtick. Also, the location filming gives a revealing glimpse behind the scenes inside a real movie studio, not only sound stages but screening room, projection booth, dressing rooms, bungalows, garage, makeup and electrical departments, etc., that raise it above average interest for any film buffs.
Not bad little cheapie, an early talkie about a murder in a movie studio. Enough clues to go on, some good red herrings, and only a couple of holes in the plot. Of course, to film buffs, Lugosi is the main attraction, but his part is small and his accent distracts. Interesting peeks at working movie company in the 30s.
I've got to admit my initial attraction to this movie was the fact that Bela Lugosi was in it...going in for that reason, this film will prove a disappointment as Bela's role is a relatively short one.
Despite this, I have to admit to enjoying this somewhat fanciful murder mystery which has the detective writer as the hero and ultimately a more competent detective than the real thing. This story about a murder on a movie set still feels more like a movie than real life..but the murder mystery does keep you guessing and interested which means it's certainly worth a watch.
Despite this, I have to admit to enjoying this somewhat fanciful murder mystery which has the detective writer as the hero and ultimately a more competent detective than the real thing. This story about a murder on a movie set still feels more like a movie than real life..but the murder mystery does keep you guessing and interested which means it's certainly worth a watch.
Another pleasant surprise from a 50 set Mystery Classic DVD package put out by Treeline Films. The Death Kiss is a diverting early 30's murder mystery set against the backdrop of a Hollywood studio movie production.This viewer enjoyed the knowing glimpse of the inner workings of a studio...the "Old Country" Jewish studio boss(with the fractured English and acute cost consciousness),the Big Star actress with a rocky private life,and the amateur sleuth screen writer.The whole cast , in this not exactly big budget film, is first-rate(a little too broad on the comedy relief). Good looking. likable chap David Manners plays the writer, and seems to be having a lot of fun doing so(what's with these David Manners bashers? My God, you'd think he was as bad as George Raft -The All-Time Worst "actor").) Bela Lugosi is earnest but somewhat out of place here.The Death Kiss keeps you guessing and is a nice flash-back to "Talkies" and actual "ice" in the ice box. Take a look....
Despite its low-budget look, "The Death Kiss" is a solid mystery, and it does a good job of creating a believable movie studio atmosphere as the background to the main story. It's also interesting to see Bela Lugosi, Edward Van Sloan, and David Manners reunited in a setting so different from "Dracula". While some of its limitations are rather obvious, it's a pretty good effort for a low-budget feature from the early sound era.
The opening sequence might be the best part of the movie, as it cleverly sets up the mystery, introduces most of the characters, and illustrates the movie's themes. In the main part of the movie, it generally follows convention, with Manners as an eager amateur who is usually a step ahead of the police. The pace is also a little uneven at times, which was relatively common in the early 1930s, but there are always some interesting details and developments that keep it together.
Van Sloan, as a movie director, gets some pretty good opportunities. Lugosi is always a welcome addition to any suspense or mystery story, and he makes the most of a character who doesn't really get all that much to do. As the lead, Manners is likable, though often a bit bland. Adrienne Ames is adequate as the heroine, and the minor characters are given some occasional moments of their own.
The result is a decent mystery that keeps you guessing. It will probably be of interest mainly to those who are already fans of the era and genre, but with that in mind it's not bad.
The opening sequence might be the best part of the movie, as it cleverly sets up the mystery, introduces most of the characters, and illustrates the movie's themes. In the main part of the movie, it generally follows convention, with Manners as an eager amateur who is usually a step ahead of the police. The pace is also a little uneven at times, which was relatively common in the early 1930s, but there are always some interesting details and developments that keep it together.
Van Sloan, as a movie director, gets some pretty good opportunities. Lugosi is always a welcome addition to any suspense or mystery story, and he makes the most of a character who doesn't really get all that much to do. As the lead, Manners is likable, though often a bit bland. Adrienne Ames is adequate as the heroine, and the minor characters are given some occasional moments of their own.
The result is a decent mystery that keeps you guessing. It will probably be of interest mainly to those who are already fans of the era and genre, but with that in mind it's not bad.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizKino Lorber films has released a Blu-Ray version of the film from an existing 35 mm print with missing scenes and the color hand tinted segments restored.
- BlooperAbout 12 minutes into the movie Franklyn Drew digs a bullet out of the wall and identifies it as a ".38 caliber center fire." It is impossible to tell from the bullet alone whether it was fired from a center fire or rim fire cartridge. Such a claim could lead to confusion in identifying the gun that fired the bullet.
- Citazioni
Officer Gulliver: Mr. Drew, I've been thinking.
Franklyn Drew: No!
Officer Gulliver: Yeah. The first thing I ask myself when I investigates a murder is 'who done it'.
Franklyn Drew: Well that sounds logical.
Officer Gulliver: And the next thing I ask myself is 'who could do it.'
Franklyn Drew: And then?
Officer Gulliver: Then I ask myself again 'who wanted to do it.'
Franklyn Drew: And how do you answer yourself?
Officer Gulliver: Well... I ain't come to that yet.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Lugosi: Hollywood's Dracula (1997)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is The Death Kiss?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 15 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Bacio mortale (1932) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi