Un umile poeta del Vermont eredita un'enorme fortuna, e nel suo viaggio a New York per riscuotere il denaro deve fare attenzione a chi intende approfittarsi di lui.Un umile poeta del Vermont eredita un'enorme fortuna, e nel suo viaggio a New York per riscuotere il denaro deve fare attenzione a chi intende approfittarsi di lui.Un umile poeta del Vermont eredita un'enorme fortuna, e nel suo viaggio a New York per riscuotere il denaro deve fare attenzione a chi intende approfittarsi di lui.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Vincitore di 1 Oscar
- 7 vittorie e 7 candidature totali
- James Cedar
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- George Rankin
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Party Guest
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Frank
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Minor Role
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Chorine
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Unemployed Farmer in Line and Courtroom
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Cabby
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensioni in evidenza
Unfair to watch this film with wholly modern eyes as some have done berating it for its celebration of small-town values and perhaps depicting a naivety that is beyond the pale. Likewise though, I don't think that we should embrace it unquestioningly as many do. At its heart it is a Frank Capra film and it presents us with everything that we have come to expect from a film with that description. A simple man (many would say a "good" man) is confronted and to an extent crushed by examples of modern society that fly contrary to his moral and solid existence. That's it. It doesn't really matter what the specifics happen to be here as this is all you really need to know. To some extent of course this is all a bit obvious and naïve and indeed to some viewer it will be hard to get past that but in its favour it does manage to presence this homely cliché with an enormous wedge of charm.
This charm is evident throughout the film but one of the best examples of it is in the courtroom scene that manages to just about avoid being preachy due to the sheer cheering quality it has to it. Capra's direction and Riskin's script bring this out really well although I would question the tagline "rocking America with laughter" it was amusing and warming but not hilarious by any means. I'm not entirely sold on Cooper in the lead and certainly not as enamoured as some are here. For my money he plays the "aw shucks ma'am" stuff just a bit too heavily, forgetting to give me a character to go along with it. Jean Arthur is better as she has more to play with, while Bancroft is fun in a bit of a cliché but a fun one. The rest of the cast do what you would expect whether they be simple men inspired, crooked men confronted or serving men treated with respect all good but nothing earth shattering.
Overall then this is an obvious film that does just what you expect it to and watching it purely with modern eyes will kill it for many viewers. It is best watched with a mind to the period even if not total forgiveness because it is not without flaws. The charm and the warming effect it has makes it though and, while not the Capra I would point the newcomer to, it is certainly an example of what we mean when we now say something is Capra-esquire (which is quite something to have your name used as a descriptive word so many years later!).
Just a wholesome, thought-provoking expose on the weirdness of typical American city thinking and behavior, being brought to light by a naïve young man who has down-to-earth small-town common sense!
From the IMDB age-bracket reviews, it seems this movie might not appeal to the younger, especially girls under 18 (go figure).
A great Frank Capra-directed film. I also really like "You can't take it with you", but that film is more off-beat and goofy.
Enjoy this film when you're in the mood for something to remind you of "goodness". Whatever that is!
The story has a light but interesting premise, with Cooper as the naive Mr. Deeds who is confronted with the consequences of sudden wealth. He and Arthur work surprisingly well in their scenes together, and they make both the premise and their relationship tangle-ups believable.
It's probably not as easy as it looks to make this kind of material work, as the rather ill-conceived 2002 remake demonstrated. The remake actually started better than expected, and for quite a while Adam Sandler was surprisingly bearable in the lead role. But eventually it lost its balance, inserting too much extraneous material that either did not work or that did not fit in with the tone and themes of the rest of the movie.
Capra, on the other hand, keeps a good balance between the light, gentle tone and the sometimes far-fetched plot developments. He winds it up in good fashion with a funny courtroom scene that also provides a couple of good, if uncomplicated, observations on human nature.
Capra and the stars all made other movies that worked even better than this one does, but "Mr. Deeds Goes to Town" itself still remains one of the better movies of its kind.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizJean Arthur never saw the film until she and Frank Capra were guests at a 1972 film festival.
- BlooperWhen Deeds announces he is giving his money to the farmers, one of the headlines of the newspaper reads backwards.
- Citazioni
Longfellow Deeds: [to the Court] It's like I'm out in a big boat, and I see one fellow in a rowboat who's tired of rowing and wants a free ride, and another fellow who's drowning. Who would you expect me to rescue? Mr. Cedar - who's just tired of rowing and wants a free ride? Or those men out there who are drowning? Any ten year old child will give you the answer to that.
- Curiosità sui creditiWinthrop Oliver Warner (a studio musician) actually played the tuba for the film.
- ConnessioniEdited into High Hopes: The Capra Years (1981)
- Colonne sonoreFor He's a Jolly Good Fellow
(uncredited)
Traditional
In the score during the opening credits and often throughout the film
I più visti
- How long is Mr. Deeds Goes to Town?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- El secreto de vivir
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 800.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 8362 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 55 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.37 : 1