Fratelli di sangue

Thicker Than Water is one of Laurel and Hardy's more consistently funny shorts. It sees Ollie being henpecked by his tiny wife (Daphne Pollard), but when Stan suggests that Ollie take charge, things go terribly wrong (how could taking advice from Laurel be anything but trouble?).

The film kicks off with an amusing washing up routine, Ollie cleaning the plates, with Stan drying them and then passing them back to Ollie to wash again. When Ollie sees what Stan has been doing he tells him to put the plates elsewhere, so Stan stacks them on a lit gas burner; Ollie picks them up to put them in the cupboard, burns his hands and drops all of the crockery. So far, so chucklesome.

A little later, Laurel and Hardy regular co-star James Finlayson arrives at the house to collect payment for the Hardy's furniture, which leads to a clever verbal exchange between all of the characters akin to Abbott and Costello's famous 'Who's on first?' routine. Following this, Stan tells Ollie that he should pay for the furniture outright with his savings, but Mrs. Hardy disagrees. Egged on by Stan, Ollie goes to the bank to withdraw the cash, but instead of paying for the furniture, he mistakenly spends the money on a grandfather clock in an auction (the price going sky high thanks to Stan). On their way home with their purchase, the clock is smashed to pieces by a lorry.

When Mrs. Hardy discovers what has happened, she loses her cool and hits her husband over the head with a frying pan (climbing on a chair to do so). In hospital, Ollie requires a blood transfusion, with Stan as the donor, and the results are unexpectedly bizarre.

Not only does this short deliver solid laughs at regular intervals, but it also features some wonderful transitions, Stan pulling the next scene from the side and dragging it across the screen. It's clever stuff for the time and really adds to the fun.

Thicker Than Water (1935) ** 1/2 (out of 4) Laurel and Hardy waste $300 on a grandfather clock so Hardy's wife hits him with a frying pan and sends him to the hospital. Again, not too funny and the worst part is the ending where the two change personalities. This here should have been a lot funnier than it turned out.

One Good Turn (1931) ** 1/2 (out of 4) L&H set out to raise $100 when they overhear an elderly woman say she's going to be evicted. Not too many laughs in this one outside the opening sequence in the woods.

Leave 'Em Laughing (1928) ** 1/2 (out of 4) Laurel is suffering from a toothache so Hardy takes him to the dentist who accidentally fills them with laughing gas. The early gags of Hardy trying to pull the tooth are funny but the ending with the cars goes on a bit too long and gets rather tiresome.

They Go Boom! (1929) *** (out of 4) Hardy has a cold so it's up to Laurel to try and find a cure so that they can get a good night's sleep. Highlights include the mustard bath and the exploding mattress.

Laurel and Hardy eat a nice dinner before setting out for a baseball game. However Mrs Hardy forces them to stay at home to wash the dishes. This, combined with further embarrassments, lead Laurel to suggest Hardy take control of his affairs rather than being owned by his wife. However a confusion over money leads the two men into a medical emergency.

Although the film feels like it has been made up of several good ideas rather than one, it still manages to be very funny for the most part. The opening dish washing routine is a great example of how much comedy they can get from a simple concept, while the `I gave it to him to give to you' routine is a good example of their verbal skills as actors. The short continues well but isn't able to be as good as it's first half again. The final scene is funny but the whole hospital epilogue doesn't really belong and it suggests that the idea occurred to them and they just looked for a film that they could tack it onto.

This sounds like a problem but it isn't that big a deal as the majority of the film works really well. Hardy and Laurel work well together and do well with the many types of routine they have here – just the routine where Laurel keeps putting clean dishes into the sink for washing is a good example of how their looks and body language can create laughs. Pollard is a good Mrs Hardy as she is feisty without being too dour. Finlayson enjoys his role as he has more dialogue than usual but also gets to do his `d'oh' and double take stuff (often it seems he either gets the physical stuff OR the dialogue).

Overall this is a really funny little short from Laurel and Hardy. The ending may feel like it doesn't belong with this film but even it manages to be worth a laugh! The fancy way that the scenes are linked (sliding doors effects) adds a novelty feel to what is a strong short from Laurel and Hardy.

Another fabulous short from Stan and Ollie, this time finding Ollie with money troubles, drawing his (and his wifes) savings from the bank to pay off their furniture! One thing leads to another, but I won't spoil it if you haven't seen it! Brilliant, and some of the lines in this movie are classic! 7.5/10

I won't wade into the same territory that others have. I think the dish washing scene was perhaps the most "Laurel and Hardy-esque" scene in the film, but the one in Helpmates was better.

Personally I felt that the banter about who gave the money to whom went on a bit longer than it needed to. I hope audiences in 1935 found it more engaging than I did.

The main reason I wanted to write a review is that I was impressed by the creative and clever way they handled scene changes from the Hardy house to other locations. Stanley grabs what might be some sort of pocket door or panel (if it were a real house) and pulls on its thick black border to walk it across the screen. The scene changes with it. In one of these clever "wipes" he accidentally lets go and it returns to the right side of the screen. So he grabs it again and walks it across the room. The scene change follows the movement of this panel. I haven't seen this trick done before. And being that this was decades before green screen, it must have been rather labor intensive to handle it in the cutting room. Bravo for this quirky little technique!