Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA respected war correspondent is found murdered, with three bullets--from three different guns--in him. Three different men are arrested, convicted and sentenced to death for the murder, but... Leggi tuttoA respected war correspondent is found murdered, with three bullets--from three different guns--in him. Three different men are arrested, convicted and sentenced to death for the murder, but only one can be the actual killer. A criminologist sets out to find who is really guilty.A respected war correspondent is found murdered, with three bullets--from three different guns--in him. Three different men are arrested, convicted and sentenced to death for the murder, but only one can be the actual killer. A criminologist sets out to find who is really guilty.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Chang
- (as Edward Keene)
- Policeman
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Prison Guard
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Latin-American General
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Newspaper Reporter
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- New York Cab Driver
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensioni in evidenza
It's an intriguing idea for a murder mystery. This movie is derived from Harry Stephen Keeler's book of the same name. I hope he wrote a mystery better than this one, because not only is Gottschalk's lie detector infallible (real ones never have been), but he comes armed with facts that are not revealed until after he makes his accusation, which makes this a cheat on the audience, even if you accept the legal positions.
The performances are pretty good for a Poverty Row movie, and the players are well known from elsewhere in their careers, even if they were not the draws they had been, or would become: Hardie Albright is a good performer away from the stultified roles he played for George Arliss' vehicles; Berton Churchill is good as an honest politician, and among the ladies, Mary Doran and Boots Mallory did all right for themselves elsewhere. But the essential unfairness of the answer to who did it rankles.
In real life this would have been straightened by the District Attorney's office before going to trial on any of the three who all turn themselves in and confess to doing the deed. But all three are tried and all three convicted.
The three murderers are Hardie Albright, Ferdinand Gottschalk, and Jameson Thomas. Tearle was a real snake on many levels as you will see and no one could blame anyone. But there are laws.
It's not a bad plot premise, but this B film suffers from lack of direction and lack of production values. Imagine what Raymond Chandler or James M. Cain might have done?
'Sing Sing Nights' is a low-budget movie based on Keeler's novel of the same name; although Keeler didn't work on the screenplay, the film preserves the inane plotting and absurd gimmickry of his unique style. At this comparatively early stage in Keeler's career, his plotlines still held some faint resemblance to reality, so 'Sing Sing Nights' is merely implausible... as opposed to his later novels, which were downright incoherent.
Floyd Cooper (played mostly in flashback by Conway Tearle) is a respected war correspondent who is secretly involved in gun-running and other crimes... until he is found dead. Cause of death: three bullet wounds in his brain, heart and spine ... fired by three different weapons! Any one of the bullets could have killed Cooper, but only ONE bullet actually did the deed. Which?
Three different men (Trude, McCaigh and Krenwicz) come forward, each admitting that he shot Cooper, and each claiming to have fired the fatal shot. All three men are arrested, tried and convicted for the same murder. All three men are sentenced to die in the electric chair in Sing Sing. (On the same night, of course.)
Into the death cell comes Professor Varney, world-famous criminologist. Because only one bullet actually killed Cooper, two of these men are innocent and must go free. (I don't believe a word of this, but it's all in the movie.) Each of the three men, in flashback, describes the circumstances which led to his decision to murder Cooper, and how he did the deed. We're meant to be kept in suspense for the final revelation, disclosing which man is the murderer and which two will go free.
Guess what? I don't care, and you won't either. The movie's central gimmick (lifted intact from Keeler's novel) sounds ingenious, but doesn't hold up to a glimmer of logic. I don't know much about U.S. criminal law from the 1930s, or forensic medicine ditto, but I strongly suspect that: #1) a New York coroner in 1934 would have no difficulty determining which bullet killed the victim; and #2) the previous point is moot, because the law would find all three gunmen culpable even if only one actually killed the victim.
This movie is brainless, but (unlike Keeler's novels or an Ed Wood flick) it's not quite brainless enough to be enjoyable in its brainlessness. All the actors give dead-earnest performances, showing no awareness of how awful this material is. Even usually reliable character actor Berton Churchill lets me down here. The pacing is terrible, the shot-matching is poor, the lighting is bad (probably on purpose, to conceal the cheap sets). The production values are wretched, without quite descending to the enjoyable cheesiness of an Ed Wood movie. If you're an Ed Wood fan who likes to read, I recommend that you seek out some of Harry Stephen Keeler's novels, which really are the literary equivalent of 'Plan 9 from Outer Space'. I don't recommend the movie version of 'Sing Sing Nights', and I rate this movie absolutely zero.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe earliest documented telecasts of this film took place in Los Angeles Friday 30 December 1949 on KTSL (Channel 2), and in New York City Thursday 20 July 1950 on the Night Owl Theatre on WPIX (Channel 11).
I più visti
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.37 : 1