Sensation Hunters

From a really cinema and score lover I feel like movies like this one that keeps hidden on a pre-code section are destinated for the ones that feels the urge to understand how society was back in the day and how the cinema was made!

I like it.

A tawdry, mundane unsexy demonstration of why you should avoid poverty row pictures. The randy young men of 1933, to whom this was clearly marketed, would have been so disappointed to find that the only saucy thing about this was the very misleading posters of a semi naked Arline Judge.

Charles Vidor, in his first picture certainly doesn't show any promise that he'll eventually become a talented director. He fails completely to engage you with this tired formulaic story populated with clichéd stereotypes. The peppering with so-called comedy is cringingly un-funny and the inclusion of musical numbers serves simply to sabotage the flow. Those musical sections are actually pretty dire - don't expect Busby Berkley here! OK, Monogram might not have had much of a budget but it looks like like they only had one camera available when filming those lifeless numbers. They're presented almost in the style of a 1929 early talkie; no imaginative cinematography, no close ups of the pretty ladies (I assume they're pretty ladies but they might be blokes in wigs - you can't tell!) and the songs are hardly memorable either.

After her superb performance in Gregory La Cava's excellent AGE OF CONSENT, it's so disappointing to see how appalling Arline Judge's acting is in this. What is meant to be a brassy, ballsy personality comes across as an amateurish and crass cartoon caricature. Of course, it goes without saying that she wasn't in the same class as say Joan Blondell but even so, she was better than this. Also sad is seeing poor old Juanita Hansen, the former beauty of the silent screen attempting a career comeback with an embarrassingly poorly written character. With a few exceptions, what's needed to be a successful 1920s screen goddess is not what's needed to be a successful actress. She had significant personal problems so it seems cruel to be critical about her but it's not a good performance.

Like those unsuspecting sensation hunters lured into the cinemas under false pretences back in 1933, you also might be tempted to watch what you might think is a racy, sexy pre-code movie. Spare yourself the disappointment, the boredom and the futility of this and just be grateful that this first incarnation of Monogram went bust shortly after making this saving the world from any more of this type of garbage.

A gaggle of seasoned showgirls board a luxury liner bound for jobs in Panama and the "newbie" among them falls for one of the passengers but it's a rocky road to love for a good girl stranded in the tropics...

SENSATION HUNTERS isn't as cheap as later Monogram features but the only "sensation" I saw was in the film's provocative poster -unless, of course, you're wild about clichés. The eclectic cast was the selling point for me and I wasn't disappointed; sassy Arline Judge (the lady in red on the poster) as a wise-cracking, thrice-married cabaret entertainer ("a sailor's delight") was the nominal star but she played second fiddle to the heroine (the boring Marion Burns) and was no less of a firecracker off-screen, having been married eight times. Cocaine addiction ruined the career of silent screen serial queen Juanita Hansen and according to "Hollywood Babylon", she later got religion and went on cross-country bible-thumping tours denouncing drugs. She must have gotten over that because here she is in this as a blowzy "Texas Guinan"- type and, like fellow Mack Sennett bathing beauty Marie Prevost, she'd packed on a few pounds by the time talkies took over. There's even a couple of cheesy song & dance routines as Preston Foster, Kenneth MacKenna, and Walter Brennan (as a stuttering waiter) look on agog. Directed by Charles Vidor who'd later become a house director for Columbia, the little studio that could.

This is a very old movie, I think from just after films started having sound in them. Some of the acting could be better but they were probably silent movie actors just moving into having to do talking roles, or just new to doing films in general. The story is fine and the performances too. Not super engaging or a great film but better than a lot of older movies, especially ones this old.

Older movies often center on manners. What some call melodrama, in this case, is 1930's survival. There is no Russian Bolshevik to save the day, which leaves people catting around looking for their place in the world. Women would join a low rent musical troupe to try for success or a husband. There are some comments on relative status aboard the ship on which the movie starts. The men are scrounging for work & wives.

I enjoy the movies & plays in which manners & human behavior are important. This is missed in modern super-hero epics that are contests of super-powers. If you wish an old-fashioned contest of manners, then you should enjoy this film. It might remind you of 'A Farewell to Arms' (1932) with Gary Cooper.