Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaWhen a nobleman murders his best friend, a lawyer becomes a revolutionary with his heart set on vengeance.When a nobleman murders his best friend, a lawyer becomes a revolutionary with his heart set on vengeance.When a nobleman murders his best friend, a lawyer becomes a revolutionary with his heart set on vengeance.
- Premi
- 2 vittorie e 1 candidatura in totale
Otto Matieson
- Philippe de Vilmorin
- (as Otto Matiesen)
George Siegmann
- Danton
- (as George Siegman)
Bowditch M. Turner
- Chapelier
- (as Bowditch Turner)
James A. Marcus
- Challefou Binet
- (as James Marcus)
Edwin Argus
- King Louis XVI
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Sibylla Blei
- Maid of Honor
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
J. Edwin Brown
- Monsieur Benoît
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Louise Carver
- Member of Theatre Audience
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensione in evidenza
This 1923 adaptation of a mid-1921 novel is one of the most faithful-to-the-original screenplays I have ever seen. Granted, large blocks of the book are omitted or greatly condensed, but who wants a 20-hour movie? The basic story line is retained and well developed.
The cinematography is superb, and the print we saw on cable was sharp and clear. It shows there is no excuse for the foggy, low-contrast prints we see in so many of the early thirties films. The sets, costumes, performances, and overall production are outstanding for any era. The silent film has been provided with a fine score, and even with its limitations is infinitely superior to the 1952 so-called "remake," which is virtually no relation to the book.
The two-hour-plus production moves along briskly (with perhaps a few too many minutes of the final mob scenes) and is exciting. Suspense is maintained very well, though my wife anticipated the ending. It was hard to keep my previous knowledge of the plot to myself.
I loved this production and give it an enthusiastic and unqualified 10.
The cinematography is superb, and the print we saw on cable was sharp and clear. It shows there is no excuse for the foggy, low-contrast prints we see in so many of the early thirties films. The sets, costumes, performances, and overall production are outstanding for any era. The silent film has been provided with a fine score, and even with its limitations is infinitely superior to the 1952 so-called "remake," which is virtually no relation to the book.
The two-hour-plus production moves along briskly (with perhaps a few too many minutes of the final mob scenes) and is exciting. Suspense is maintained very well, though my wife anticipated the ending. It was hard to keep my previous knowledge of the plot to myself.
I loved this production and give it an enthusiastic and unqualified 10.
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizAn army of workmen built a whole French village that covered sixty acres and was faithfully reproduced down to cobblestone streets and shop windows filled with actual wares. Hundreds of thousands of yards of muslin, satin, brocade, and velvet were required in the making of the gorgeous costumes worn by the cast.
- Versioni alternativeOn 5 December 2000, Turner Classic Movies broadcast a 124-minute version with a new musical score written by Jeff Silverman and played by the Janacek Philharmonic Orchestra, Ostravia, Czech Republic, conducted by Hugh Munro Neely. It was the first time the film was shown on television.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Hollywood (1980)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- Скарамуш
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 858.723 USD (previsto)
- Tempo di esecuzione2 ore 4 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.33 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Scaramouche (1923) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi