Atlantis

This movie is supposed to be based on a semi-autobiographical drama of the author (Hauptman).. While dramatisation, he has modified quite a few aspects, the poet dramatist Hauptmann has become a Bacteriologist ( Kammacher) and the estranged wife Marie has become insane Angelique.

One of the parts, supposedly forced on by Hauptmann, as a precondition for allowing the drama to be made into a movie was of the un-armed virtuoso Stoss (played by the real life armless virtuoso (Charles Unthan) was extraneous to the narrative, but then it made me aware of the person, and his genius, so I won't bicker on that.

The other part, or rather the actress, that had been forced on the movie, was the cabaret performer Hahlstroem (Orloff), who was the real life flame of Hauptmann for some time.

While changing the actual story to the screen-play, there were some changes made, and that were actually to the detriment of the story. had that been kept to the original, it could have been a far better one.

Despite her bouts of insanity, the hero, Kammacher, loved his wife, Angelique, and he had gone to US, in search of a cure. That aspect had been glossed over, and hence the shock, at the death of Angelique becomes strange. In between his infatuations with Orloff doesn't contradict his love (the opening Spider and moth dance had already delineated that). I wonder how Orloff, it being her real life narrative too, agreed to do the part, which completely lacks sympathy. Though the role wasn't of a spider, more of a social butterfly. In real life too, Hauptmann was attached to his wife Marie, and tried to reconcile, after his affair, not with Orlofff but with his would be second wife, Margaret, became known and she walked away on him.

Had it been handled a bit better, it would have been a master piece. Along with the above, and a few more, disconsonant factors, it also lacked pacing. Some of the reviewers had mentioned it to be slow.I will agree to a certain extent. It was slow at wrong places. Where it should have been slow, to build up the narrative, it went through too fast. For example Eva's character was never properly build up.

Over all, it isn't a bad movie for 1913, in fact it is quite above average, but missed, by just a few notches, to become a masterpiece.

Riding on the heels of the Titanic tragedy, Denmark's Nordisk Film "Atlantis," released in December 1913, eighteen months after the British boat's sinking, brought audiences realistic images of the real ocean calamity. The Danish producers denied the correlation, claiming their film was based on a Gerhart Hauptmann novel published pre-dating the Titanic launch by a month in 1912. But the popularity of the film, with its enactment of a passenger boat being evacuated in the middle of the ocean with great loss of life, could easily be directly linked to the Titanic.

"Atlantis" has a back story of a border-line insane husband of a dying wife who seeks respite in his travels, only to find love on a trans-Atlantic passenger boat. The liner Roland hits a half-submerged ship (not an iceberg) and sinks. "Atlantis," named after a dream our protagonist has right before the strike, brought the moving images of scrambling passengers loading into lifeboats or diving into the frigid waters to save themselves like no other "Titanic" film produced before. The film was so believable Norway banned it from being played citing poor taste in profiting from the liner tragedy a year earlier.

"Atlantis" eventually became Nordisk Films' most popular movie and was labeled a masterpiece by several reviewers, notably one film historian who was so bold to call it "one of the first modern movies." Besides the exciting 30-minute sequence of the sinking and rescue of the passengers, highlights include B-Roll of New York City pre-World War One and a lively exhibition of an armless entertainer who opens a bottle of wine on stage and pours it into glasses using his feet.

Future director of "Casablanca" and "Mildred Pierce" Michael Curtiz, listed as Mihaly Kertesz in the film as the main character's friend, was also an assistant director helping the production move along.

The first time I ever heard of this movie was while reading a lengthy online interview with noted film preservationist David Shephard wherein he named it as his favorite film but, having now watched it for myself, frankly I was quite disappointed. ATLANTIS is inspired by a book which had anticipated the Titanic tragedy - although, as depicted here, the shipboard section only takes about half-an-hour (occurring mid-way through the proceedings) of this 114-minute film; essentially. these scenes aren't badly done but the static camera-work muffles much opportunity for suspense and excitement!

The film opens in decidedly unusual fashion with a moving depiction of a mental case, but this is soon followed by what has to be one of the silliest dance numbers ever put on film, as the husband of the aforementioned patient goes around the world to rethink his situation and bafflingly falls for the resistible charms of the chubby ballet performer, ending up with her on a ship that collides with a wrecked vessel due to thick fog! The husband is, understandably perhaps, a rather morose fellow, going from place to place - Berlin, Paris, New York, and eventually ending holed up in a mountaintop cabin - and from woman to woman without ever acquiring happiness; as it turned out, some of the film's best scenes are those depicting the bustling N.Y.C. life of the the 1910s. ATLANTIS is, however, full of even more irrelevant bits, none more so than the exhibition of a real-life 'armless wonder' (14 years prior to THE UNKNOWN, I might add!) which, while in itself would make for a fascinating short subject, here it proves merely an overlong distraction. What's more, the title of the film is misleading because, while the main character supposedly dreams himself in the famed underwater city (prior to the sinking of the ship), the scenes take place above ground and are extremely brief to boot!

Thankfully, the occasional visual aestheticism of the film is preserved by the generally good quality of the print on hand and its transfer to DVD and one only needs to take a look at the ragged excerpt from a Japanese print included as a supplement to appreciate the sheer amount of work that went into restoring the film. Other supplementary features on this Danish Film Institute disc are an alternate tragic ending devised for the Russian market and an excerpt from a 1914 film co-directed by Blom and Holger-Madsen (two individual sci-fi films by these directors - THE END OF THE WORLD [1916] and A TRIP TO MARS [1918] respectively - were subsequently paired on DVD by the same outfit and which I've just watched myself).

This film is very well done according to every standard of film-making. The narrative runs smoothly, the cinematography is years ahead of the period and special effects run amok with imagination and quality. The DVD released by the Danish Film Institute is one of the very best copies of a pre-WW I film one can see nowadays. To be brief, its amazing, astonishing, mind blowing. The Danes began storing and archiving their films very early, so you get a clean second generation copy where most of US films of the period went to the glue or comb factory. It's a long film and tends to get a bit tedious; also the shipwreck scenes (done very well indeed) are rather brief and once they are over, the film turns back to mainstream melodrama. What makes this film rather hard on eyes, is the leading lady. I know it's an unkind thing to say, but the lady is really not beautiful. She is supposed to be a dancer, but her dance scene is atrocious and embarrassing. It's inconceivable why a handsome leading man should ever fall for that kind of middle aged hippie. All in all, a good pic, but to be viewed by intelligent spectators who can delve into history without expecting too much. There are some nice extras, even including an alternative ending, made for the Russian market!

The idea of a 1913 full length feature film from Denmark intrigued me and I was pleasantly surprised. The melodrama records the events in the life of a somber, but sympathetic researcher, starting in Europe and ending in New York. The sinking of an ocean line, a la Titanic, is well done. The acting is restrained and the plot coherent and interesting. Recommended for silent movie fans.