Due fratelli gemelli criminali, intraprendono un pericoloso viaggio con rapina. Affrontando problemi legali, scontri a fuoco e drammi familiari, devono riconciliare le loro divergenze prima ... Leggi tuttoDue fratelli gemelli criminali, intraprendono un pericoloso viaggio con rapina. Affrontando problemi legali, scontri a fuoco e drammi familiari, devono riconciliare le loro divergenze prima che la loro missione porti all'autodistruzione.Due fratelli gemelli criminali, intraprendono un pericoloso viaggio con rapina. Affrontando problemi legali, scontri a fuoco e drammi familiari, devono riconciliare le loro divergenze prima che la loro missione porti all'autodistruzione.
- Premi
- 1 candidatura in totale
Jen Landon
- Young Cath
- (as Jennifer Landon)
Andrew Joseph Brodeur
- Avery Jacobson
- (as Andrew Brodeur)
Margo Moorer
- Mrs. Jacobson
- (as Margo Williams Moorer)
Recensioni in evidenza
With a kind of stacked cast people might've expected a lot more from this movie. I don't believe they thought they made a masterpiece, moreso just a fun loving action comedy. If you aren't judging as a critic and just as a general viewing experience I feel like it was definitely above average these days. Parts were cheesy and crude but in almost an early 2000s feel. I found it to be an easy watch and enjoyed the performances of the actors involved. I can understand the disappointment some people may have with this movie. Some parts are a bit formulaic. I definitely think it's not meant to be art(film) but just a movie(entertainment). Which is perfectly okay, because as much as people want great films there's many people who just want to sit down and watch an entertaining movie.
There's a lot of pretty scathing reviews here. I read some before I started this and set my sights appropriately low. Maybe that's why I kinda liked it?
There was a lot of what people complained about - inconsistent tone, crass humor, slapstick scenes, overly stupid characters doing stupid things, predictable outcome.
Yes, all of the above.
I still laughed at a lot of it. Probably because the main actors played their parts to perfection. No matter the reason, if you laugh and enjoy something, go with it and don't think about why you liked it.
This is one of those movies. Don't overanalyze it. Don't worry about what others think. Just go with the ride.
There was a lot of what people complained about - inconsistent tone, crass humor, slapstick scenes, overly stupid characters doing stupid things, predictable outcome.
Yes, all of the above.
I still laughed at a lot of it. Probably because the main actors played their parts to perfection. No matter the reason, if you laugh and enjoy something, go with it and don't think about why you liked it.
This is one of those movies. Don't overanalyze it. Don't worry about what others think. Just go with the ride.
Many of the most negative reviews that have been posted here have the same keywords, the same key phrases, and criticize the same talking points, as if a single person wrote multiple reviews as a personal vendetta, for whatever reason. This movie is actually pretty enjoyable. It's an intentionally mindless farce comedy with some original ideas, great character actors, and novel plot twists. Peter Dinklage and Josh Brolin have natural chemistry and great dialogue to work with. Perhaps they were allowed to improvise some of their exchanges. Brendan Fraser plays his character perfectly, note for note, and seems to be having a great time. M. Emmet Walsh appears in a few scenes, just long enough to remind people that he is a king of character actors. It's a mindless comedy that is intentionally ridiculous, and it works.
Brothers had promise and potential going for it. Really solid cast. It started strong. The plot was interesting enough. I'm not sure if I should compare movies to generational classics, or the rest of the junk available to stream the past few years. I feel like Hollywood has never recovered from the writer's strike and it shows. This film is watchable, due to the low bar of available content. Do comedies now cater to the stupor of the low IQ majority of society? If you like low brow humor like seeing a grown man being jacked off by an orangutan, then you'll enjoy this movie. If you prefer witty sophisticated humor, you will roll your eyes a lot. I don't fault the actors. They played their roles. Dinklage is a true talent. Brolin shows range playing a believable character who isn't a tough guy with super powers. Marisa Tomei is great in everything. I wonder why she was uncredited. Fraser even pulled off the shady guard. Never been a fan of Glenn Close, but her prime was before my era. Brothers fails to draw you in. It's slow and lacks any kind of movie magic that makes you care about the outcome. You can't get invested in the characters' unrealistic plight. I'm sure the actors were desperate for a paycheck, but they're all better than this. It had its moments, and I made it to the end which is saying something I guess.
So many issues with this movie. Was everyone in this just bored and couldn't get another job, so they lowered themselves to do this? Every one of the actors in this movie are legendary in their own right, but this movie? They just proved that no matter how good of an actor you are, a bad script, bad directing, and low budget can cause great actors to be bad actors.
This movie was almost cartoonish and presented itself as if a child wrote it.
I'm all for silly and mindless comedies ... if they're funny. This movie was not funny. It was definitely mindless and barely cut the mustard at being silly. It was more absurd and overly exaggerated than anything else.
This movie was almost cartoonish and presented itself as if a child wrote it.
I'm all for silly and mindless comedies ... if they're funny. This movie was not funny. It was definitely mindless and barely cut the mustard at being silly. It was more absurd and overly exaggerated than anything else.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizGlenn Close wears gloves in every scene. This is because in the original script, Close's character had cut the tips of her fingers off so she wouldn't leave fingerprints anywhere while down in Mexico. This detail was to have been revealed during the bar scene, but was cut from the final film.
- BlooperMoke is forced to masturbate Samuel, the ape, using his right hand. Shortly after runaway from the animal, Moke sniffs his left hand in disgust.
- ConnessioniReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 967: Here (2024)
- Colonne sonoreBeen Caught Stealing
Written by Eric Avery, Perry Farrell, Dave Navarro (as David Navarro) and Stephen Perkins
Performed by Jane's Addiction
Courtesy of Warner Records
By arrangement with Warner Music Group Film & TV Licensing
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Brothers?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 29 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti