Shadyside, 1978. La scuola è finita per l'estate e le attività a Camp Nightwing stanno per iniziare. Ma quando qualcuno è posseduto dall'impulso di uccidere, il divertimento al sole diventa ... Leggi tuttoShadyside, 1978. La scuola è finita per l'estate e le attività a Camp Nightwing stanno per iniziare. Ma quando qualcuno è posseduto dall'impulso di uccidere, il divertimento al sole diventa una macabra lotta per la sopravvivenza.Shadyside, 1978. La scuola è finita per l'estate e le attività a Camp Nightwing stanno per iniziare. Ma quando qualcuno è posseduto dall'impulso di uccidere, il divertimento al sole diventa una macabra lotta per la sopravvivenza.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 vittoria e 3 candidature totali
Jacqueline Vené
- Joan
- (as Jacqi Vené)
Recensioni in evidenza
Part One had such a bizarre tone for me when I watched it... I didn't know who to root for. I kept wondering why all of the characters were so emotional, angry, and annoying... and yes, the constant 90's nostalgia music being shoved down our throats I thought was too overwhelming. Trust me, I noticed it too lol.
This one however, I thought kept it pretty lean... by continuing on Part One in the beginning with the C. Berman character starting her part of the story... enough to keep you intrigued for what's to come.
And it doesn't disappoint.
Sadie Sink did a fabulous job, and the rest of the cast did as well. Not a lot of whiny dialogue, and you got to know each of the characters in a more relaxed way instead of everyone simply yelling at each other all the time like in Part One.
I was glad to see that the story in Part Two had mostly to do with what happened to C. Berman, and included none of the characters from the first film (minus in the bits in the beginning and bits in the end, respectfully.)
And it's set at a camp right?!? Especially back in 1978... I mean, c'mon man! That camp full of all of those kids back in those days in 1978 would be ripe for the pick in' for a serial killer. And this film doesn't cut back on the slasher flick-type gore either. You'll be satisfied, I assure you.
Again, unlike Part One I really didn't find myself rolling my eyes once. Great addition to the story!
Overall, looking forward to Part Three after this!!
This one however, I thought kept it pretty lean... by continuing on Part One in the beginning with the C. Berman character starting her part of the story... enough to keep you intrigued for what's to come.
And it doesn't disappoint.
Sadie Sink did a fabulous job, and the rest of the cast did as well. Not a lot of whiny dialogue, and you got to know each of the characters in a more relaxed way instead of everyone simply yelling at each other all the time like in Part One.
I was glad to see that the story in Part Two had mostly to do with what happened to C. Berman, and included none of the characters from the first film (minus in the bits in the beginning and bits in the end, respectfully.)
And it's set at a camp right?!? Especially back in 1978... I mean, c'mon man! That camp full of all of those kids back in those days in 1978 would be ripe for the pick in' for a serial killer. And this film doesn't cut back on the slasher flick-type gore either. You'll be satisfied, I assure you.
Again, unlike Part One I really didn't find myself rolling my eyes once. Great addition to the story!
Overall, looking forward to Part Three after this!!
This one has a good setting which kinda transports us viewers to the late 70s n early 80s slashers a la the camp ones.
This time they showed some brutal slashing via an axe but i am happy that at the same time they restrained the violence towards kids.
The only crib is that there is no nudity n the makers tried their level best to hide nudity which kinda looked too forceful.
Can someone tell me why there wasnt lottuva poop inside the tunnel underneath the outhouse.
Hope they show some good atmosphere n terror in the final chapter.
This time they showed some brutal slashing via an axe but i am happy that at the same time they restrained the violence towards kids.
The only crib is that there is no nudity n the makers tried their level best to hide nudity which kinda looked too forceful.
Can someone tell me why there wasnt lottuva poop inside the tunnel underneath the outhouse.
Hope they show some good atmosphere n terror in the final chapter.
The 70s camp theme didn't quite deliver as much as I was hoping, however it's a lot of fun to watch the story come together. Much like its predecessor, this movie struggles to feel like the decade it's based in. Which is a real shame because I could see these becoming cult classics if they pulled off the retro look. I preferred 1994, but Sadie Sink was a joy to watch on screen, she really carried the movie. I'll definitely be watching 1666, but I'd be lying if I said I wasn't nervous, olden days horror movies scare the crap out of me!
Improving slightly upon its predecessor- and proving to be even more entertaining- Fear Street Part Two is still a bit uneven, but the sum of its parts manages to bring along a familiar but engaging ride. I was much more impressed with the acting in this one than in the last one. It's nothing incredibly profound, but Sadie Sink is just perfectly cast in the lead role of Ziggy- and the other supporting actors never feel like they are forcing their performances despite their thinner characters. The film is incredibly entertaining and does add a bit more to the potential and worldbuilding that the first one set up, which I think they did a good job on. The issue lies more in the story of this film itself, as it takes the steps it needs to forming its story, without providing anything truly original or memorable. It's beginning, although partially necessary, feels like it's used as nothing but to kill time- and the majority of the film feels rather pointless in the trilogy's plan- as we don't get to anything truly important until the end. Also, just a small thing, we didn't need to hear Cherry Bomb three whole times throughout the course of the film- it's a good song and all- but seriously it just feels forced. Despite all that though, the film is moving with its relationships at hand, and truly allows you to care about the characters on screen even despite their flaws- a great improvement from the melodramatic writing of the characters in the first film. In the end, Fear Street Part Two 1978 is a decent sequel and decent film with decently sized flaws. It's far from the potential it could have had, but like the last one, still manages to be a solidly enjoyable film.
My Rating: 7.3/10.
My Rating: 7.3/10.
If you watch it as a regular slasher flick instead of comparing it to the book, it's actually much more fun to watch. Not everything has to be taken seriously lol.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizAlthough this is the second film in the Fear Street trilogy, it was actually filmed last, after Part One: 1994 and Part Three: 1666.
- Blooper(At around 1h27m) Alice is demonstrating that she is able to walk and put weight on her broken leg. Her break was the most severe type, a compound fracture, where the bone is completely severed and has pierced the skin. It would be impossible to put any weight on it, nor walk, as there is no supporting structure, not to mention the severe pain.
- ConnessioniFeatured in The Kill Count: Fear Street Part 2: 1978 (2021) Kill Count (2021)
- Colonne sonoreThe Man Who Sold the World (MTV Unplugged)
Written by David Bowie
Performed by Nirvana
Courtesy of Geffen Records
Under license from Universal Music Enterprises
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Fear Street: Part Two - 1978?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- La calle del terror (Parte 2): 1978
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 49 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti