Recensioni degli utenti

I have been following the directorial career of John Williams keenly. As such, I was eager to sample his latest offering 'Tales of the Creeping Death'. Clearly influenced by the Hammer and Amicus horror anthologies of the 60's and 70's (a sub-genre I used to love as a child), Williams conjures up four diverse stories, plus the obligatory wraparound story.

The wraparound story sets the mood very well. Goose (Michael Socha), is a hitman hired by wheelchair bound eccentric Harold (Andrew Readman). His contract is not to kill someone, but to ensure that Harold stays alive until 3 o'clock on the night in question, with no further explanation provided (up until the film's chilling conclusion that is). To pass the time, Harold proceeds to tell Goose the aforementioned four stories. The wraparound proves an effective narrative devise, and ties it up quite nicely at the end (a satisfied nod and "aaaaah" from this reviewer on first viewing). Also of note, the chemistry between the two works really well throughout.

Taking place on Halloween, the first story follows the zombie costumed Billy (Billy Cook) as he finds himself unexpectedly attending a black tie party with a couple friends, only to quickly discover that all is not what it seems. For my money, this stands out as the best story of the four, and features some fantastic, and very convincing, make up effects from Special Make Up Artist Gary Pollard.

The second story provides a snapshot into the life of Kev (Dean Ackerman). Dean plays his character so well (standout performance in the film in my opinion). It is hard not to smile as you see him going about his business, making friends, and organising events for his Super Smooth Gang. Ricky Tomlinson guest stars as Dad, and gives a typical, but very enjoyable performance in the limited screen time he has (you know what you get with Ricky). What the story lacks in chills, it certainly makes up for in laughs. Very funny, but still well worth its inclusion in a horror anthology film.

Story three is a tale about three work colleagues on a team building exercise in a rural hotel in Wales. Following a detour on route (a local cave network tourist attraction), they are subjected to a series of strange occurancies, leading to the hotel being deserted upon their arrival. As the story reaches its conclusion there are clear nods in the direction of a certain well known film from the late 70's, but it remains interesting and well executed non-the-less. That being said, it probably didn't grab me quite as much as the other three offerings.

The fourth story depicts the aftermath of the brutal murder of the parents of bingo caller Shane (Darren McAree) by an unseen creature. This story again showcases the talents of Gary Pollard, who provided the awesome creature design, and copious amounts of gore in the frenetic conclusion. Enjoyable romp to end on.

Overall, a very enjoyable entry into John Williams' catalogue. Well worth a look.

A lot of effort and time has obviously gone into this film and I have to say well done to all those involved for such an achievement. I think the negative reviews come from people who have no idea how hard it is to produce a film and on a low budget and the dedication that is needed. Some of the stories are better than others, but that is usually the case with such anthology type films. I found it generally entertaining and the directors quirky sense of humour shines through once again. Still prefer Crispy's Curse though..... Part 2 please, 'Revenge of Crispy, The Fist Strikes Again'. You know it makes sense.

I am a massive fan of independent Horror films and thoroughly enjoy a good anthology.

This is a throwback to the classic Amicus and Hammer Horror Anthologies of the past.

The main characters give really convincing performances but the segments and stories are the real reason to watch this. Well made tales with a twist..

I have been a backer of low budget films in the past. Some came good, some ended in the bin. I have huge respect for the incredibly dedication it takes to raise the money to make any film and for that I have given it one star. Sadly this one proves that it takes more than a quirky sense of humour and the belief that one can do it. The second star is for the fact that John Williams has a sense of telling a story. Sadly the story he tells is poor. Also, any decent film has to have decent dialogue. The dialogue in every case (apart from bits of the wrapper scene between Harold and Goose) is shockingly bad. This is not helped by some truly appalling performances. I really want that hour and half back. Life is too short.

Overall a great little low budget anthology film. I've definitely seen worse, bigger budget films.

The linked scenes with Michael Socha and Andrew Redman are really well acted and scripted. Funny interaction between the pair, which comes across with the on screen chemistry.

There are parts of the segments that are slow paced and don't add much to the story. But, the segments themselves aren't over egged or too long, then it's back to Socha and Redman for an injection of humour. For me, the best story is the second one, imaginative, fresh and funny. Dean Ackerman is fantastic in this role.. I would love to see a spin off or full film just on this!!

There are some nice special effects throughout, most of the time. It doesn't have a big budget, but as long as you keep that in mind and aren't expecting CGI effects with perfect delivered lines. British produced horror with a splash of humour, well worth supporting in my opinion.

Brilliant title, great first tale then let down with progressively terrible, boring, poorly acted and produced tales of zero scares or enjoyment. Your soul certainly will die after ensuing this. A MISS!

I had the absolute pleasure of watching this extremely well made movie. Not only did this film make me laugh a lot, it also had my jaw dropped on several occasions. From the opening scene to the last scene, I was totally gripped! Such a clever ending and a joy to watch. 10 out of 10 from me.

How does this film get such good reviews?

It tries to be a clever Hammer film but it fails spectacularly. When I say badly acted, I can't blame the script entirely... it's just badly acted. Are the writers trying to make this a Spoof film? Are they living in the worst type of 1956 film not in a good way. Is this an inside joke? The special effects are silly and badly done. Honestly... It's a poor homage to Hot Fuzz and Shaun of the Dead and an insult to great films like Creepshow... Don't bother.

A well written script with some fantastic special effects.

Made on a very small budget A film not to be missed Great acting A film made with the help of the talented people of Stoke on Trent.

I'm partial to a comedy and a horror but this was every angle of bad.

Script..bad. Acting..bad. Storylines..bad. Special effects..bad. (Take out the word special for that last one) Save yourselves and get your mates to perform a skit for better entertainment.