VALUTAZIONE IMDb
3,9/10
1767
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un uomo è perseguitato dal fantasma di un ragazzo di nome David, che cerca di ucciderlo.Un uomo è perseguitato dal fantasma di un ragazzo di nome David, che cerca di ucciderlo.Un uomo è perseguitato dal fantasma di un ragazzo di nome David, che cerca di ucciderlo.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Recensioni in evidenza
Step 1: Have Buzzfeed be anywhere near it.
Step 2: Be money hungry.
Step 3: Have the most cringe worthy "message/lesson"
Honestly I ADORED the story on Twitter (X) and having LoeyLane read us the tweets and discuss it with us. It was some good times and this movie just upped and ruined it. I HATED Adam in this movie.
What I am most disappointed with is Justin Long. Why would he work for/with BUZZFEED? He could have done some much better with another movie. Maybe he needed the money, but honestly is money worth bruising your reputation?
Find the OG story and read it. This strangers wannabe story isn't it. You can do better.
Step 2: Be money hungry.
Step 3: Have the most cringe worthy "message/lesson"
Honestly I ADORED the story on Twitter (X) and having LoeyLane read us the tweets and discuss it with us. It was some good times and this movie just upped and ruined it. I HATED Adam in this movie.
What I am most disappointed with is Justin Long. Why would he work for/with BUZZFEED? He could have done some much better with another movie. Maybe he needed the money, but honestly is money worth bruising your reputation?
Find the OG story and read it. This strangers wannabe story isn't it. You can do better.
A horror-movie, with at its core the (over)abundant use of social media, has an attractive 2020's touch to it. The critical edge is well done, we see the main character being absorbed by his cell phone, to the extent of neglecting his friends and even his lover; and we see how his social media company thrives on inventing new trending topics - however extreme or cringing - just to expand their bulk of followers.
But as an intended horror movie it fails. The premise is just too farfetched, and the execution too chaotic to make it really involving. Apart from a few creepy images, that flash by in an instant, there's hardly anything scary going on, and it's hard to get a grip on the supposed narrative. It's some sort of Candyman or Bye Bye Man "saying something three times" thing: in this case asking the supernatural internet troll a question three times, that does the trick of summoning a horrific fate unto yourself. But why this troll haunts the internet, or why Adam is chosen as a target, never becomes clear. The acting was just average. And it didn't really help that the Adam-character was rather sulky and unsympathetic, and not very pleasant to look at.
But as an intended horror movie it fails. The premise is just too farfetched, and the execution too chaotic to make it really involving. Apart from a few creepy images, that flash by in an instant, there's hardly anything scary going on, and it's hard to get a grip on the supposed narrative. It's some sort of Candyman or Bye Bye Man "saying something three times" thing: in this case asking the supernatural internet troll a question three times, that does the trick of summoning a horrific fate unto yourself. But why this troll haunts the internet, or why Adam is chosen as a target, never becomes clear. The acting was just average. And it didn't really help that the Adam-character was rather sulky and unsympathetic, and not very pleasant to look at.
Dear David is another horror film (like Elevator Game) based on an internet meme.
In this case, an old Buzzfeed twitter thread about a man who claims he is being haunted/trolled by a sleep paralysis demon, in the form of a young boy, named David.
Both in waking life...and on the internet.
Having never been a Buzzfeed user- or internet trend follower- myself...this is the first I'm hearing of it.
So I'm of the viewer class who has gone into the movie without being privy to the trend it is based on.
Which makes the whole thing seem like it was funded by Buzzfeed, in an attempt to recapture the attention of the internet, in a way that could garner them the virality that the original story managed to perpetuate.
An elaborate marketing scheme designed to farm clicks...which is all it ever was in the first place, mind you.
And it almost worked.
As I was somewhat enticed to search for Buzzfeed...if only to see if it is actually still relevant.
However, it wasn't enticing enough to overcome my will not to care.
Which kind of gives you an idea about how the movie sits.
Storywise (on it's own), it just comes off as a mediocre psychological horror that is based on "the entity" experience (made famous by the much better, based-on-a-true-story, film, from 1985, of that name).
Only, with the male character, here, experiencing a male form of the entity...presumably, because he's gay.
As men normally experience a gray-haired crone, as opposed to the shadow-like male entity experienced by females.
That being said...that's not to say that this is overtly horrible...or by any means unwatchable.
Just that it's kind of mid, in comparison to it's much better predecessor.
Because the action bits in this don't hit as hard.
While the attempts at jump scaring you just aren't effective.
Though, to be fair...this film is much more psychological in nature.
Focusing on the fragile mental state of the main character- and his subsequent downward spiral- as opposed to a physical investigation into the paranormal nature of the unseen world from which this phenomenon originates.
So...it is of a somewhat different nature, despite being based on a somewhat similar experience, of a very real phenomenon (I'm well aware of because it happened to a friend of mine...and led to a police incident, which I ended up writing a song about).
Which is precisely why it can be exploited by company's like Buzzfeed, whose bottom line is based on creating the next viral sensation...not only to garner clicks...but keep itself relevant.
Which is, unfortunately, what this film feels like it's a desperate attempt to do, in the end.
4.5 out of 10.
In this case, an old Buzzfeed twitter thread about a man who claims he is being haunted/trolled by a sleep paralysis demon, in the form of a young boy, named David.
Both in waking life...and on the internet.
Having never been a Buzzfeed user- or internet trend follower- myself...this is the first I'm hearing of it.
So I'm of the viewer class who has gone into the movie without being privy to the trend it is based on.
Which makes the whole thing seem like it was funded by Buzzfeed, in an attempt to recapture the attention of the internet, in a way that could garner them the virality that the original story managed to perpetuate.
An elaborate marketing scheme designed to farm clicks...which is all it ever was in the first place, mind you.
And it almost worked.
As I was somewhat enticed to search for Buzzfeed...if only to see if it is actually still relevant.
However, it wasn't enticing enough to overcome my will not to care.
Which kind of gives you an idea about how the movie sits.
Storywise (on it's own), it just comes off as a mediocre psychological horror that is based on "the entity" experience (made famous by the much better, based-on-a-true-story, film, from 1985, of that name).
Only, with the male character, here, experiencing a male form of the entity...presumably, because he's gay.
As men normally experience a gray-haired crone, as opposed to the shadow-like male entity experienced by females.
That being said...that's not to say that this is overtly horrible...or by any means unwatchable.
Just that it's kind of mid, in comparison to it's much better predecessor.
Because the action bits in this don't hit as hard.
While the attempts at jump scaring you just aren't effective.
Though, to be fair...this film is much more psychological in nature.
Focusing on the fragile mental state of the main character- and his subsequent downward spiral- as opposed to a physical investigation into the paranormal nature of the unseen world from which this phenomenon originates.
So...it is of a somewhat different nature, despite being based on a somewhat similar experience, of a very real phenomenon (I'm well aware of because it happened to a friend of mine...and led to a police incident, which I ended up writing a song about).
Which is precisely why it can be exploited by company's like Buzzfeed, whose bottom line is based on creating the next viral sensation...not only to garner clicks...but keep itself relevant.
Which is, unfortunately, what this film feels like it's a desperate attempt to do, in the end.
4.5 out of 10.
1. It's a BuzzFeed Studios original film, and BuzzFeed is a putrid pestilence, a blight on Internet's body that fuels the addiction to the "content" and boils people's brains. *a disgruntled Desperate Housewives character GIF*
2. The main character is a chubby, neck-bearded, latte-sipping, overly sensitive yet sarcastic gamer dude in his 30s, obediently serving the corporate by doing a laptop-ridden, "creative" job of drawing infantile, disposable comics. In other words, the very worst caricature of Millennials you could imagine. *a reality show Black woman cackling GIF*
3. The story is contrived, exploitative and unapologetically poorly-thought. *an Ad*
4. The dialogues are written by someone severely lacking real-life communication skills and experience. *an Andy Samberg "Gotcha!" GIF*
5. There's a scene where the main character (an adult man, in case you missed) hides under the blanket. *a Steve Harvey "WTF" GIF*
6. The CGI is ludicrous and amateur. *an Ad*
7. The scariest thing about Dear David is that it might be the last thing someone watched before dying. What a horrible way to go. *a creepy smiling Willem Dafoe GIF*
8. The script fails miserably to blend elements of horror, comedy and drama together, creating an uneven and borderline appalling mess.
9. The whole Twitter killer schtick died in 2014, when there was supposed to be a film called #ikllr, but even the director bailed on it and left it permanently unfinished. *a The Office "It's true" GIF*
10. Dear David is a cringe-inducing, shallow, vapid and downright miserable experience that no one deserves.
Related article: These 27 Twitter Threads Absolutely Do Not Need A Screen Adaptation.
2. The main character is a chubby, neck-bearded, latte-sipping, overly sensitive yet sarcastic gamer dude in his 30s, obediently serving the corporate by doing a laptop-ridden, "creative" job of drawing infantile, disposable comics. In other words, the very worst caricature of Millennials you could imagine. *a reality show Black woman cackling GIF*
3. The story is contrived, exploitative and unapologetically poorly-thought. *an Ad*
4. The dialogues are written by someone severely lacking real-life communication skills and experience. *an Andy Samberg "Gotcha!" GIF*
5. There's a scene where the main character (an adult man, in case you missed) hides under the blanket. *a Steve Harvey "WTF" GIF*
6. The CGI is ludicrous and amateur. *an Ad*
7. The scariest thing about Dear David is that it might be the last thing someone watched before dying. What a horrible way to go. *a creepy smiling Willem Dafoe GIF*
8. The script fails miserably to blend elements of horror, comedy and drama together, creating an uneven and borderline appalling mess.
9. The whole Twitter killer schtick died in 2014, when there was supposed to be a film called #ikllr, but even the director bailed on it and left it permanently unfinished. *a The Office "It's true" GIF*
10. Dear David is a cringe-inducing, shallow, vapid and downright miserable experience that no one deserves.
Related article: These 27 Twitter Threads Absolutely Do Not Need A Screen Adaptation.
I have to say I'm a little surprised by all the hate I found on the page regarding Dear David.
It's a fun movie, attacking a nice subject, one that isn't overused, has some moral weigth to it and a great ending. I especially liked the fact that it reminded me of In the mouth of Madness, that great paranoia feel, not knowing what is real and what is fake. Thus I feel obliged to recommend this one, because it is a lot better than the latter over hyped horrors that appeared. It isn't afraid to be real, raw and take it to the next level with solid scenes that make your skin crawl, but just a little indeed.
Overall Dear David was a nice experience for me, so I am going to advise any horror fan to give it a go. It's definitely a nice add on to the list and it is worth a view. I think I would have enjoyed this on the big screen honestly, because it relies a lot on tension and not jump scares, thus if the mood and surroundings are good, I think the movie will look a lot better. Also, seeing Justing Long on the screen in a horror is always a bonus!
Cheers!
It's a fun movie, attacking a nice subject, one that isn't overused, has some moral weigth to it and a great ending. I especially liked the fact that it reminded me of In the mouth of Madness, that great paranoia feel, not knowing what is real and what is fake. Thus I feel obliged to recommend this one, because it is a lot better than the latter over hyped horrors that appeared. It isn't afraid to be real, raw and take it to the next level with solid scenes that make your skin crawl, but just a little indeed.
Overall Dear David was a nice experience for me, so I am going to advise any horror fan to give it a go. It's definitely a nice add on to the list and it is worth a view. I think I would have enjoyed this on the big screen honestly, because it relies a lot on tension and not jump scares, thus if the mood and surroundings are good, I think the movie will look a lot better. Also, seeing Justing Long on the screen in a horror is always a bonus!
Cheers!
Lo sapevi?
- QuizBased on the viral Twitter thread Dear David, by Adam Ellis.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Dear David?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- La Maldición De David
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 553.854 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 34 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.39:1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti