Un ragazzo e sua sorella entrano nella foresta per scavare un buco all'inferno. Questo dovrebbe essere un film maledetto della fine degli anni '70 e "Antrum" esamina il potere terrificante d... Leggi tuttoUn ragazzo e sua sorella entrano nella foresta per scavare un buco all'inferno. Questo dovrebbe essere un film maledetto della fine degli anni '70 e "Antrum" esamina il potere terrificante della narrazione.Un ragazzo e sua sorella entrano nella foresta per scavare un buco all'inferno. Questo dovrebbe essere un film maledetto della fine degli anni '70 e "Antrum" esamina il potere terrificante della narrazione.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 3 candidature totali
Recensioni in evidenza
To give its directors David Amito and Michael Laicini credit, Antrum does a great job in its quest to feel like a genuine product of the horror nasties that littered rental stores in the 70's and 80's and in an production space and sense this low budget offering should be commended for its respect of the films that clearly inspired it, but the narrative built around this is a Blair Witch like slow-burn that never gets to the culmination or pay-off one would hope.
For what's supposed to be "the deadliest film ever!" much of Antrum is rather tame, you keep suspecting a finale to blow us off our feet is coming, something akin to Hereditary, The Witch or The House of the Devil perhaps, but Amito and Laicini are unable to get us to a destination like that as Antrum peters out with an ending that is neither scary or shocking, despite brief hints it might be going to some such space.
Surrounded by Alicia Fricker's noteworthy score and some solid performances from its young leads Nicole Tompkins and Rowan Smyth, as two siblings hell-bent on finding the soul of their lost family pet in some seedy woods that harbor some dark goings on, Antrum has more going for it than your average direct to VOD release that litter the marketplaces these days with their enticing titles and plot lines but it's never able to capitalise on the strengths it finds itself in possession of.
There's no doubt that had Antrum been able to utilise the tools at its disposal and done more with its hybrid idea of fake documentary played straight with a special screening of the film at the core of its investigation, we could've been in for a real horror treat but despite its title that claims otherwise the only deadly thing about this affair is how boring and lame it gets in its end game, squashing any chance it had of making its mark.
Final Say -
The marketing team behind Antrum deserve some sort of bonus as while much has been made about concept and deadly nature of this film, Antrum is in most cases a boorish horror that lives off its fine throwback style to a time gone by.
2 grimoires out of 5
I liked the film. The film succeeds in creating a creepy atmosphere. It is not as scary as some people in the review mentioned, it is definitely creepy and an interesting watch.
Plot: The film starts by introducing the legend of the film named Antrum. It is said to be cursed and anyone who saw it died. The Antrum starts. A boy has nightmares that his dead puppy Maxine is in hell, so his older sister takes him to a forest where with help of a mysterious book they can dig into second layer of hell and save the soul of Maxine. On this journey things gets increasingly disturbing and the question arises are we really in a forest or descending into hell.
The imagery is effective and creepy. We see lots of sigils, markings and blurred face of demons. The editing is done intentionally in a way that makes seem like made with some sinister purpose. The cautionary tale in the beginning is very clever, it makes the viewing feels like something we shouldn't be doing.
The acting is amazing, there are some twists there. Which makes sense and was hinted early on. The characters of brother and sister is likable.
The film has similar feelings of The Blair Witch Project. Towards the end film gets intense. Enjoyed the film.
A girl and her brother go into the woods to try and find their dog... Or bury their dog; I'm still not sure. The sister has been telling her younger brother about the entrance to hell through a sort of folklore story.
They walk a lot, they barely talk for a while, they meet some rednecks who have some satanic plot. They dig some more. Supposedly digging their way to hell. Looking for a dog that died, but the brother loved him so the sister thinks she can find the dog again by digging their way to hell. It's convoluted and boring.
It looks like a movie made in the 70's through grainy after effects and the styling of clothes is appropriate. The acting isn't bad at all. For how young the leads are I think they did a good job overall in that respect. It just fails to capture any real suspense or even a slight thrill. There are moments of unease and some cool visuals, but most of that has nothing to do with the main storyline.
Overall, I think this was a huge missed opportunity. When the most compelling part of your movie is the first ten minutes (which actually isn't part of the 'movie') you have a problem.
It is slow, uneventful, messy and just uninspired. When I want to see more of a mockumentary about a cursed tape (which we have all seen before) then you know the rest is a dud.
I am giving it 3 stars because the mockumentary section was good, the acting was decent and it did give that 70's lost film kind of vibe at times. Beyond that there is nothing to see here. If you were drawn in by the marketing of the most horrifying, deadly movie then don't watch this. If you want to see a slightly well crafted 70's style movie then maybe give it a watch, but don't expect anything super compelling or scary at all.
This film will only kill you with boredom.
Antrum is a gimmick. It is a movie about a movie that plays the movie in its entirety, and that is going to make it a difficult pill for many people to swallow. But the premise is pretty solid. There exists this movie, it is pretty messed up, and everyone who watches it dies. Now, does it work?
The movie is interesting in its commitment to the gimmick. It does feel like a movie from the 70s. There are a few tells that detract from it, but things like the choice of clothes, the jenky 70s audio, and grainy film quality does make it feel older. But more importantly, it makes some of the effects feel natural. Periodically, there are sigils that pop up that looked as though they were etched into the film by hand. Then comes the truly messed up parts. The movie sporadically just quits and cuts to some shocking footage. I didn't care for the torture scenes so much but there is one scene that I found truly disturbing. Without spoiling anything, its when the screen just spontaneously goes black where the movie gets genuinely so creepy it becomes hard to watch. There is no build to it but it is the most upsetting two minutes I've seen in any movie.
Unfortunately, the plot of the movie is a bit slow and tedious. There are long shots of kids digging a hole. In fact, that's the premise of the movie. This isn't necessarily bad, it works with the gimmick, but if you can't bring yourself to buy into that gimmick, its going to hurt. A lot. No manner of horrible taxidermy squirrels or devil shaped brass bulls is going to save that. If you can get into it, the movie is pretty entertaining, like looking up cursed images online. Its just you putting more into it.
I overall liked it. It was a fun experience if only for its cursed film gimmick. Not for everyone but ultimately something that should have been tried for yourself before reading a single review. So if you've gotten to this point, you've done goofed.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizBlink and you miss it: There are several phrases in latin scattered all over the movie. These phrases are shown in at least one frame: 15:54 min 'Abyssus Abyssum Invocat' (Deep calleth unto deep). These words are part of the Psalms, chapter 42, verse 7, of the King James Version. 44:45 'Facilis Descensus Averno' (the downward path to death/Hell Is easy), from Virgil's Aeneid, Book VI, Line 126. 55:07 'Cave Hominem Unius Libri' (Beware the man of one single book). A variant of 'Homo Unius Libri', a phrase attributed to Thomas Aquinas. 1:10:02 'Nihil Pretiosius Veritate' (Nothing is more beautiful than the truth), attributed to Francisco Sánchez de las Brozas, from his opus 'Minerva sive de causis linguae latinae', Book I, Chapter 1.
- BlooperAt 1:16 the woman is holding a full size Glock. The first full size Glock, the 17, wasn't available until 1982.
- Citazioni
Title Card: LEGAL NOTICE: By continuing to watch this film, you agree that the producers of this film have made you aware of the history and dangers associated with Antrum. The producers, distributors, cast, crew, unions, and theater management on all levels, are released of all liability for any event that occurs to you during or after your screening, including but not limited to illness, injury, mortal danger, or death. If you disagree in any way with this notice, you must leave the theater now.
- Curiosità sui creditiA second set of credits is shown 10 minutes in for the deadly film, after the documentary-style introduction. The cast and crew names are mostly written in Cyrillic letters, with a few exceptions, which use the Latin alphabet.
- ConnessioniFeatured in FoundFlix: Antrum (2019) Explained (2020)
I più visti
- How long is Antrum: The Deadliest Film Ever Made?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 26 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 35min(95 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.78 : 1