Tre fratelli adulti si ritrovano a vivere a livelli di sicurezza finanziaria molto diversi l'uno dall'altro.Tre fratelli adulti si ritrovano a vivere a livelli di sicurezza finanziaria molto diversi l'uno dall'altro.Tre fratelli adulti si ritrovano a vivere a livelli di sicurezza finanziaria molto diversi l'uno dall'altro.
- Premi
- 4 candidature totali
Sfoglia gli episodi
Recensioni in evidenza
Not bad at all so far. I've always liked Topher Grace and good to see him on a sitcom for the first time since That 70s Show. Acting is pretty good throughout and the comedy doesn't seem too forced. I'll be watching more!
I like it, the actors are pretty good and likable. Topher needs to stop with the stupid clumsy acts. They look so scripted and it doesn't work. He doesn't have the comedic timing that the other brother has in his scenes. The sister is kind of annoying but comes together with her wife. I hope the show continues and grows more in-depth characters. I feel it might be the a good show in the spring lineup.
"Home Economics" is a comedy, nothing more. It is about an extended family in which one member is financially well-off and living on a different economic plane than his siblings. This generates some friction, in part due to envy, but also because one wing of the family---the sister in a biracial lesbian relationship-rejects anything on its face that appears to be un-woke.
This is where I think some reviewers misunderstand the series. It is not about promoting wokism; some of its best jokes are stabs at the virtue signaling, hypocrisy and idiocy that comes with some ultra-progressive dogma. When they talk about the pronouns for a pet, you know they know what the real joke is.
Some of the humor might be termed intersectional. Not in the sense that the term is used by progressives, but in terms of the intersection of various doctrines that contradict each other. So you have a scene where the sister is called out for pitting her own feminist ideology against her professed belief that women (and girls) should be supported in their endeavors.
These jabs are not dwelt on. They pass quickly in the course of normal conversation, making them even more impactful.
Like most comedies, the quality of the show depends primarily on its characters. The ensemble nature of this show makes all the characters important, but some carry the load of the humor. And the cast is committed to the humor. The writing is also essential. Though this is not on the same level as "Frasier" or "Modern Family" and thus does not deserve a "10", it deserves more than the "1" that some reviewers have doled out.
At this point, I am content with the balance of the humor---willing to skewer the rich brother or the virtuously poorer members in equal measure.
This is where I think some reviewers misunderstand the series. It is not about promoting wokism; some of its best jokes are stabs at the virtue signaling, hypocrisy and idiocy that comes with some ultra-progressive dogma. When they talk about the pronouns for a pet, you know they know what the real joke is.
Some of the humor might be termed intersectional. Not in the sense that the term is used by progressives, but in terms of the intersection of various doctrines that contradict each other. So you have a scene where the sister is called out for pitting her own feminist ideology against her professed belief that women (and girls) should be supported in their endeavors.
These jabs are not dwelt on. They pass quickly in the course of normal conversation, making them even more impactful.
Like most comedies, the quality of the show depends primarily on its characters. The ensemble nature of this show makes all the characters important, but some carry the load of the humor. And the cast is committed to the humor. The writing is also essential. Though this is not on the same level as "Frasier" or "Modern Family" and thus does not deserve a "10", it deserves more than the "1" that some reviewers have doled out.
At this point, I am content with the balance of the humor---willing to skewer the rich brother or the virtuously poorer members in equal measure.
6.5 is probably more accurate. I've binged a good amount of the series (just started S3). It isn't like a LOL show. There are some light chuckle moments.
It is an engaging and relatable show. Each character is a bit extreme and some things don't make sense. (There is an episode in S2 that hits the nail in the head here) I do enjoy how the actors all play off each other and I really enjoy the casting of the show.
You gotta suspend reality here for alot of it, but isn't that the same with every show, but I'm glad I gave it a shot. It's been entertaining, and especially for a binge to have in while I'm doing stuff.
It is an engaging and relatable show. Each character is a bit extreme and some things don't make sense. (There is an episode in S2 that hits the nail in the head here) I do enjoy how the actors all play off each other and I really enjoy the casting of the show.
You gotta suspend reality here for alot of it, but isn't that the same with every show, but I'm glad I gave it a shot. It's been entertaining, and especially for a binge to have in while I'm doing stuff.
It kinda reminds me of Life in Pieces with some of the quick dialogue!! It's true that a few of the jokes are a little over the top with the diversity theme but I thought it was and probably will be pretty good!!
Lo sapevi?
- QuizAccording to Topher Grace, Lisa Kudrow turned down a part on the show.
- ConnessioniFeatured in MsMojo: Top 10 Modern Sitcoms You Should Be Watching (2023)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How many seasons does Home Economics have?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Home Economics
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti