VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,8/10
9840
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Alice è una madre single e lavora per un'azienda specializzata nello sviluppo di nuove specie di piante. Contro la politica aziendale, porta a casa una delle piante come regalo per suo figli... Leggi tuttoAlice è una madre single e lavora per un'azienda specializzata nello sviluppo di nuove specie di piante. Contro la politica aziendale, porta a casa una delle piante come regalo per suo figlio Joe.Alice è una madre single e lavora per un'azienda specializzata nello sviluppo di nuove specie di piante. Contro la politica aziendale, porta a casa una delle piante come regalo per suo figlio Joe.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 8 vittorie e 17 candidature totali
Jessie Mae Alonzo
- Selma
- (as Jessie-Mae Alonzo)
Marie Noel
- Colleague 3
- (as Marie Noel Ntwa Ydjumbwiths)
Recensioni in evidenza
I'll break this review down into three sections; Performance, Production, Plot.
Performance. Everyone is pretty much spot on. All the performances are reserved, which aids the intrigue of whether or not they've been infected and even when you're certain their performances always seem to leave you with a sense of doubt.
Production. This is the highlight of the movie. The sound design (both soundtrack and environmental) do a great job creating a sense of discomfort and foreboding. The costume and set design is beautiful and clinical, but also with great touches of vibrance.
Plot. By far the weakest area in the film and unfortunately what lets the film down. The idea is interesting and the way it's developed is interesting too, but plot points are often contrived or out of place and ultimately too little happens over too long a space of time to keep you fully engaged.
Performance. Everyone is pretty much spot on. All the performances are reserved, which aids the intrigue of whether or not they've been infected and even when you're certain their performances always seem to leave you with a sense of doubt.
Production. This is the highlight of the movie. The sound design (both soundtrack and environmental) do a great job creating a sense of discomfort and foreboding. The costume and set design is beautiful and clinical, but also with great touches of vibrance.
Plot. By far the weakest area in the film and unfortunately what lets the film down. The idea is interesting and the way it's developed is interesting too, but plot points are often contrived or out of place and ultimately too little happens over too long a space of time to keep you fully engaged.
Im sure that you have read that this is a more modern retelling of invasion of the body snatchers. Don't think of it that way though. If you compare the 2 then my rating for this would go down. This feels more like a pretentious indie movie rather than a horror. The whole thing being about a flower was interesting, but the characters are boring and uninteresting. Which is disappointing considering that is what is supposed to hold this movie together. There isn't really a satisfying climactic scene that the movie builds up to and there is a ton of build up. The music in the movie was really odd to say the least and sometimes annoying. What can I say, I feel as if I wasted a lot of time on this movie.
Scientists have created a flower that can make people happy. It is clear though that inhaling the pollen has a stronger effect than just that.
Whilst this is an attractive looking film with an interesting idea and a terrifically weird and wonderful score, the storytelling is linear and pretty staid without the twists and turns that could have made everything more interesting. In addition, the acting, whilst in part intended, is also a little too robotic by all involved to make you really care about the direction of travel.
Whilst this is an attractive looking film with an interesting idea and a terrifically weird and wonderful score, the storytelling is linear and pretty staid without the twists and turns that could have made everything more interesting. In addition, the acting, whilst in part intended, is also a little too robotic by all involved to make you really care about the direction of travel.
Visually appealing but irritating. I don't know if that's what the producers of this were hoping for, and if so they managed to get on my nerves a lot. Everything from the music, to the main characters inability to register what's happening in front of her face. It's basically a film about a plant gaslighting a woman for two hours. I don't know what the film makers were going for and that makes this a bland and slow film
The story has an interesting premise, and can be quite suspenseful. However, the pace is super slow, which kills the suspense and momentum. The music and the repeating CCTV shot at the plants get tiresome as well. Overall, I couldn't say I enjoyed it.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizAs stated in another post, the location is undisclosed. The street scenes were, however, filmed in Liverpool as you can see the Liver Building in the distance of one street scene.
- BlooperThe plant, "Little Joe", has no leaves, so that it cannot produce chlorophyll.
- ConnessioniFeatures Catch Phrase (1986)
- Colonne sonoreRunning
Written by Teiji Itô
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Little Joe?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Little Joe: El negocio de la felicidad
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 23.862 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 10.626 USD
- 8 dic 2019
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 208.821 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 45 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti