[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario delle usciteI migliori 250 filmI film più popolariEsplora film per genereCampione d’incassiOrari e bigliettiNotizie sui filmFilm indiani in evidenza
    Cosa c’è in TV e in streamingLe migliori 250 serieLe serie più popolariEsplora serie per genereNotizie TV
    Cosa guardareTrailer più recentiOriginali IMDbPreferiti IMDbIn evidenza su IMDbGuida all'intrattenimento per la famigliaPodcast IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralTutti gli eventi
    Nato oggiCelebrità più popolariNotizie sulle celebrità
    Centro assistenzaZona contributoriSondaggi
Per i professionisti del settore
  • Lingua
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista Video
Accedi
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usa l'app
Indietro
  • Il Cast e la Troupe
  • Recensioni degli utenti
  • Quiz
  • Domande frequenti
IMDbPro
The Unheard (2023)

Recensioni degli utenti

The Unheard

24 recensioni
5/10

Cool concept, too long w/ bad char. decisions

I actually really liked the concept of this film. Kind of like a supernatural, sci fi, horror, thriller. All my favorite things. It starts off well, builds the lead and the back story. The audience gets invested in her and the story.

Here's the thing though, the middle is rough to get thru. Its repetitive, meandering and the plot just stalls for the most part. There's no payoffs and I just could barely keep my eyes open (long day at work before watching).

The other issue is typical horror trope bad character decisions. You'll know when you see them and you might even yell at your TV. I did. Although there are issues, if you can stomach the middle it's a pretty cool movie. The acting isn't great but it was a good attempt at a complex (back and forth in time) story. 5/10.
  • zack_gideon
  • 30 mar 2023
  • Permalink
4/10

Sorry

  • abuozama
  • 1 apr 2023
  • Permalink
4/10

More like "The Unwatchable"

I thought this looked like an interesting premise, but the plot meandered a bit as time went on. Too many rabbit trails along the way to the real meat of the story, which was pretty bland once you got there.

The overuse of the flashing, distorted TV images was SUPER annoying and the audio was impossible to decipher. At first I didn't know if that was deliberate because of the main character's hearing problems, but I turned on closed captioning and saw that the distorted videos that kept popping up (ad nauseum) actually had dialogue in there.

Had I not had CC enabled, for example, I don't think I would have guessed that at the end, the audio was saying "Say happy fourth of July" over and over. It was so muddied and indistinct. And made no sense... maybe that was a callback to an earlier part of her watching those fuzzy home movies and I just missed it because it was, as my review title says, unwatchable (and inaudible).

The baddy in the movie was entirely predictable and the ending was just "meh" and left you kind of hanging anyway. It's not like I need it all wrapped up in a neat little bow, but there was literally zero denouement, nothing. Just "okay, baddy is dead" and roll credits. Yawn.

Every character was basically two dimensional... you see them on screen, think you're getting some back story and getting to know them, and then they vanish forever, never to be seen again. What's up with that? Screen filler and time padding, that's all.

At best, this story could have been a somewhat interesting half hour twilight zone'ish episode, but they strrrrreetcheeeeed it out to 2 hours, and it shows.
  • imdb-20212
  • 5 apr 2023
  • Permalink
5/10

Spastic VCR with Epileptic Cassettes

The film starts with a warning that some scenes could induce seizures. And, it stays true to that assertion to the end.

Lachlan Watson plays Cloe, who is a depressed and deaf young adult who undergoes experimental surgery to regain her hearing, which was lost when she had a childhood meningitis infection. As she returns to her childhood home for recovery, she regains her hearing. Soon after she starts to hear ghostly whispers, garbles, and eerie sounds particularly when she watches the old VCR tapes from her earlier childhood.

Lachlan Watson is an upcoming Hollywood star in the making. From an early age, she started taking small parts in the Burning Coal theater and later in the Triangle theater. She played in the "Chilling Adventures of Sabrina" and the second season of "Chucky"

The concept is interesting. It is more of a drama with a bit of horror and not the other way around. I think that extremely corrupted and distorted video images and sounds made storytelling much less compelling and a lot more confusing.
  • RedKidBytes
  • 16 apr 2023
  • Permalink
4/10

I don't know why or what happened

  • john-vaudrey
  • 3 apr 2023
  • Permalink
5/10

"Happy 4th Of July"

  • gab-67599
  • 2 apr 2023
  • Permalink
2/10

A dull mess

The Unheard has a runtime of 2 hours and 5 minutes. It feels three times that long. The main reason for that is this film has no idea what it wants to be. Is it a body horror? A psychological thriller? A ghost story? A serial killer movie? Well, it tries to be all this and succeeds at none. The movie suffers from its runtime, it could have used a rewrite with an emphasis on choosing one direction and also an editor that wasn't afraid to speak up. A decent cast is basically wasted in a boring mess of a movie that is bloated beyond reason. Oh, and if you are epileptic or suffer from motion sickness, stay far away from it. The director really thinks strobe lights and high frequency noise is cool. It's not.
  • haskel-72951
  • 25 mar 2024
  • Permalink
5/10

Works when it's going somewhere

I liked the basic scientific/supernatural ideas offered here, and I would have found the film a lot more interesting if it stuck with and developed them. Why has this girl become attuned to otherworldly messages and how can electronic devices be used to monitor supernatural phenomena? That's good stuff. Unfortunately, the thriller aspect of the film is the least successful, and that becomes obvious as those elements begin to dominate the plot in the third act. If you can't figure out who's behind a series of murders in the area in just a few minutes, then you're a really bad judge of character.
  • tellstar
  • 7 apr 2023
  • Permalink
7/10

90s style thriller /sci fi

  • martinjohnston39
  • 3 apr 2023
  • Permalink
5/10

Really Listen to the Epilepsy Warning!

The film comes with an epilepsy warning, and oh boy does it need one. It's not just the odd scene either, to various degrees of intensity, it has the effects through out the entire film. So it's really hard to avoid. So honestly listen to that warning.

If I'm honest I don't think they added to the film either.

It's a slow burn, but it does keep you interested for a bit, but I don't think the pay off was that great. It was okay, but I thought the rest of the film was better than the end.

I think it had some really great concepts in there, like sound on a different frequency being heard by the previously deaf character.

I think think it's probably worth a watch overall.
  • icocleric
  • 3 apr 2023
  • Permalink
8/10

Great movie

This moving isn't as bad as people make it out to be, yes it is a slow burn and I mean a really slow burn, but, if you get the concept of what they were going for, well at least I think that is what they were going for. Just picture it as a real life scenario where the person has a health issue and have to navigate around the town and amongst people, let alone living by themselves anything can happen and this picture is a perfect example of this. We should pay more attention to people with disabilities, and be more involved, especially when its a small town and strange things seem to be going on around. Humanity has failed many of times with people in need. Yeah you may not be responsible for that person and yeah you may reason, you aren't their keeper, but, most of them need help more than you can imagine. Back to the movie. Give it a chance if I had mind critics or comments from others, I would definitely miss out on a pretty great movies. Sometimes your taste may not be their taste, so its best to give it a go and see if its for you.
  • Che36
  • 8 mag 2023
  • Permalink
6/10

Worth a watch

  • safebabai
  • 30 mar 2023
  • Permalink
5/10

It had a lot going for it...

I think unheard has a great plot and a lot going for it. It had all the right elements and could have been so much better, but it ends up being a tedious and slow thriller. It also suffers from an identity crisis and doesn't know if it wants to be a serial killer movie, supernatural or a family drama.

The film is about a young woman staying alone at her family's cabin while she participates in an experimental procedure to try and regain her hearing she lost at 8 years old. The procedure is successful and she starts hearing things beyond the grave.

The acting of the main character is too subtle and relaxed. She makes some stupid decisions by the end. Acting against normal flight or fight insights. By the second half all the characters acting and dialogue became really strange and out of character.

There are aspects of this film that are creepy, but because of the slow pace and confusing narrative, it doesn't work. The film is over two hours long and doesn't establish much in that slightly above-average runtime.

Overall, I give this movie 5 stars. There was a lot this movie had going for it and had some original ideas I liked.

Warning, the last several minutes of the film are jarring, the visuals and noise become extremely erratic (hence the warning at the beginning for those prone to seizures).
  • laceydelrae
  • 4 apr 2023
  • Permalink
3/10

Confused

  • BandSAboutMovies
  • 30 apr 2023
  • Permalink
3/10

"Unheard" should have remained "Unseen" too!

  • gunn-wrights
  • 30 apr 2023
  • Permalink
4/10

distracting

Chloe Grayden (Lachlan Watson) undergoes an experimental treatment for a chance to restore her hearing. She goes back to her family vacation home and starts hearing things. There is the case of her missing mother.

As a concept, this is really interesting and has great potential. I can imagine how odd auditory incidents could intermingle with solving a family mystery. This movie fails to achieve that. It insists on doing weird visual representations for hearing things. It's distracting non-sense. The movie loses its way and I stopped caring. This is a cool concept being wasted and everybody's time as well.
  • SnoopyStyle
  • 11 apr 2023
  • Permalink
4/10

Simple plot too complex for the average imdb user, what else is new?

  • mamporrero
  • 28 apr 2023
  • Permalink
6/10

Not without some big issues but likable enough for what it is

Suffering from hearing loss, a woman undergoes an experimental procedure to implant a device that will help restore it and retreats to her childhood home to heal up, but when she starts to get notices of something unearthly contacting her, she tries to piece together the messages with her mother's death.

This was a decent enough if somewhat problematic effort. Among the positives here come from the intricate storyline that brings about some rather off-beat elements into this type of story. The central setup involving the deaf woman undergoing the procedure and trying to navigate the world for the first time as an adult who can hear the world around her makes this intriguing enough, especially once the infusion of bizarre screeches and static-y noises start punctuating her attempts at recovery. This sets the film in motion towards a solid ghost story alongside a serial killer stalking the area killing off young women which allows for a series of solid and decent-enough stalking scenes followed up with some brutal killings to hammer everything home that gets tied together through a series of reveals that feature some decent connections for how it all works. This gives the film a solid grounding for the unnatural atmosphere of the investigation sequences while also allowing enough suspenseful stalkings with the bloodshed to be worthwhile in places. There are some big issues here that hold this one down. The main drawback on display is the absurdly overlong and unnecessary running time that comes about mainly because the film is mindlessly repetitive in the middle segments. Endlessly going through the same process involving her shuffling around the house maintaining it, finding tapes of her family when she was a child, or dealing with the other issues surrounding the procedure which all combine together into running this section of the film into an absurdly long time. The lack of genre thrills on display here when not dealing with anything of grave circumstances as the lack of action makes this one quite dull, especially with the constantly-flashing strobe lightings and screeching sound-effects utilized by the videotapes or whenever the killer strikes which produces much more of a drama feel here than anything. The other drawback to the film is a decidedly chaotic and scattered storyline that may have some great ideas but also provides some random elements as a result. Most of that is due to not knowing what it wants to be and filling in tons of unwanted space trying to do so, with this ranging from a drama about her coming to terms with the recovered ability to hear once again, a haunted house story about the strange bumps and noises she encounters, and a serial killer film as the madman strikes various women on the outskirts of the story. Since there's so much going on here, and combined with the repetitive nature of these storylines hindering much of the opportunity to go through with the build-up of this storyline, it all comes off as predictable and not very surprising who the killer is or what their motivation was. These make for a watchable if heavily flawed genre effort.

Rated Unrated/R: Graphic Language and Graphic Violence.
  • kannibalcorpsegrinder
  • 25 gen 2024
  • Permalink
2/10

Dumbest Ending On A Promising Movie EVER

  • heykateforever
  • 27 ago 2023
  • Permalink
7/10

Solid Premise but Not Enough Exploration to the Strong Points

This is a movie that looked interesting to me when I was looking for 2023 releases on Shudder. I added this to my list to check out when I couldn't make it to the theater. What I knew is that this dealt with 'white noise' so I wanted to see what they'd do with the concept. I did come in blind as well. I've decided to go ahead and make this a featured review.

Synopsis: Chloe Grayden (Lachlen Watson) undergoes an experimental procedure to restore her hearing. She begins to suffer from auditory hallucinations related to the vanishing of her mother.

As said in the synopsis said, Chloe is our lead. She lost her hearing as a child due to meningitis. What we will learn later in this is that it put her in a coma. When she came out of it, her mother was gone as was her hearing. We see her as she volunteers for an experimental treatment as a trial. This is led by Dr. Lynch (Shunori Ramanathan). They use stem cells to stimulate the growth of the damaged part of the ear.

We see that Chloe struggles with not knowing what happened to her mother. For good reason though. Her and her father have been unable to sell their house in Cape Cod due to this. Chloe heads out there to recover from her treatment. This is also for closure as they prep to sell. There are VHS tapes in the closet of home movies. She watches them. She notices as well that there is someone in a house on the other side of the lake watching her.

The hot water isn't working so Chloe's father reaches out to Hank (Nick Sandow) to come take a look. We learn later that he was a police officer when Chloe's mother disappeared. He is now a handyperson and the local harbormaster. He is fond of Chloe and wants to help. She also runs into Joshua (Brendan Meyer). The two of them were friends when they were children. They talk and he even takes her to his mother, Ellen (Boyana Balta), who used to watch her when she was a toddler.

There could be positive developments from the experimental treatment. Chloe can hear the television and the tapes she is watching. She isn't sure if it is hallucinations though. She thinks she can hear her mother when putting her ear to floor. Chloe is determined to find the truth. There also seems to be a history of young women disappearing in the area. Chloe gets warned to watch out for Joshua as there is something that is off about him and his mother. Whatever is happening to these women seems to happen to Megan (Nancy Cantine) as she closes a local store.

That is where I'll leave my recap and introduction to the characters. Where I want to start is that when this was starting up, I read more of the synopsis. This made me think that we were getting a variation of the movie White Noise. You could say that is the case. There is communication from beyond the grave through a television, VHS tape and there could be more involving this isolated house. I'll admit, this fascinates me even though it isn't doing anything necessarily new with it. The static screen is something I grew up with and thanks to things like Poltergeist, it makes me feel uncomfortable.

Now that I've set that up, let me delve into our lead here of Chloe. I like the explanation as to why she talks like she does. She learned to talk and then lost her hearing when she was a child. She kept up with speech therapy which allows someone who doesn't have this ailment to portray the character. I bought it at once. What I also like is the use of technology here. Chloe didn't want to learn sign language. I'm guessing she knows enough to get by. She uses her phone to allow people to talk and then reads what they said. She talks back to them to respond. Now as she gains back her hearing, there is a side effect that she might hear things that aren't necessarily there. We are flirting with her as she could be descending into madness or depression. There's also a subplot that gets introduced but doesn't necessarily go anywhere with her questioning her sexuality as well.

This movie is carried by her. I should say that before moving to what I want to explore next. I'm not sure this fully knows the story it wants to tell. I'll give it credit; it does bring all the threads together and they tied it up so that is good. I've already brought up the potential supernatural aspect. This is exploring how Chloe's mother could be communicating to her through the old home videos. The mother is played by Michele Hicks. Her hearing her mother could be explained by the treatment and the medications she is taken as well. There is also the idea that she is a medium and susceptible to ghosts. Again, the treatment could be the explanation as well. There is also the high number of women that disappear in the area. We get a scene where a woman is murdered. Joshua then comments to Chloe about how she disappeared. This last part we lose for a long stretch and I thought about it right before the reveal to the truth. It focuses a lot on the supernatural/haunting, but I don't know if it is exploring either enough to fully work for me.

There isn't more for the story that I want to go into so let's go to the rest of the acting. I've said that Watson was good and carries this. Everyone is pushing her to where she ends up. I thought that Sandow was good as this father figure that takes a liking to her. The more we get to know him, the more interesting he becomes. Meyer is good as a potential suspect. He questions Chloe about things, but I realized he didn't have all the information. Ramanthan is good as a doctor. I like what they do with Hicks as the mother. Other than that, the rest of the cast rounded this out for what was needed.

All that is left is filmmaking. I'll start with the video stuff we get. The tapes are warped. It was annoying, but I do have to admit, I don't have an issue. This was supposed to be filmed in the 90's as my guess. The tapes would have been at the tail end of their existence. There is a good chance they could be molded as they weren't stored in a way to protect them. I'd say that the cinematography other than that was good. It didn't necessarily stand out. I'll bring back up the tapes, there are ethereal voices of ghosts and humming. I like what they also do, that when we are following Chloe, before hearing is restored, we can't hear anything. They transition this well and I was impressed by that. It was a strong move in how they used it.

In conclusion, I like the use white noise that is used here. We have good story elements of Chloe being deaf, the struggles that come there and how her hearing comes back might be her link to the other side. Her performance is good with the rest of the cast pushing her to where she ends up. I'd even say this is made well enough with the sound design being the strongest aspect. I just think there are too many threads that don't get explored enough. This caused me to lose interest and I think with the runtime, it was a bit boring for me. We needed a stronger mystery or more investigation to work better. Still worth a watch in my opinion, but not a high priority.

My Rating: 6.5 out of 10.
  • Reviews_of_the_Dead
  • 30 lug 2023
  • Permalink
3/10

Would Have Been More Interesting If She Never Regained Her Hearing.

If the description wouldn't have detailed the premise of this film...I would have had no idea what was going on.

Sure, it's pretty obvious that she miraculously regained her hearing, as a result of an experimental medical procedure, after losing it to meningitis as a child.

But as for the rest of the plot...it's not exactly evident.

Less that there is a serial killer operating in the area.

And the he has her in his sights.

The whole supernatural element- and her supposed psychic abilities- manifest in both bizarre and confusing ways.

To the point where I'm not exactly sure how they helped drive the storyline forward.

The whole thing is rather slow burning...and plods on for much longer than it needs to.

Meaning that it's a bit too bloated for what it is.

That being said, the acting- particularly from the lead actress- is decent enough to keep you engaged.

Even though the whole thing is rather boring.

Up until it's somewhat disturbingly violent final act.

However, that's not exactly enough to safe it from it's inherent mediocrity.

No doubt, the concept is kind of intriguing.

However, the film itself is really quite passable.

And probably would have been more interesting if she was just deaf the whole time.

Especially considering the ending is kind of ridiculous.

Either way...it definitely did not need to be over 2 hours long.

2.5 out of 10.
  • meddlecore
  • 28 ago 2023
  • Permalink
2/10

30 Hours you'll never get back! Not totally annoying but more so towards the end it's the most frustrating garbage you'll ever have the misfortune of watching.

Not totally annoying but more so towards the end it's the most frustrating garbage you'll ever have the misfortune of watching. It really becomes an unwatchable mess which makes no sense whatsoever. I hated this movie the longer it went on the worse it got.

What's audio got to do with video tape flashbacks. It makes no sense at all. It's a stupid movie about what I don't know. There is a mother who was killed by some guy who she kills in the end. It takes nearly 5 hours getting there and another 5 hours to get it done.

I fell asleep so quickly watching it should be sold as a sleep aid. I re-watched the second half which I wish I never did as it just pissed me off no end waiting for it to get to the end. At nearly 30 hours long this movie is just far too much.
  • fluffchop
  • 30 mar 2024
  • Permalink
4/10

A below average addition to the horror genre

The Unheard (2023) is a movie that was recently added to Shudder. The storyline follows a young lady who went def shortly after losing her mother. She decides to join an experiment that may cure her lost hearing. As her hearing starts coming back she starts having strange dreams of what happened to her mom...and when she wakes up she keeps experiencing things from her dreams. What happened to her mom and what is this experiment doing to her?

This movie is directed by Jeffrey A. Brown (The Beach House) and stars Lachlan Watson (Only the Good Survive), Nick Sandow (Orange is the New Black), Brendan Meyer (The Guest) and Shunori Ramanathan (The Big Sick).

This premise had a lot of potential and the acting is actually pretty good; unfortunately, the horror elements are lacking. The use of noise just isn't scary. The first kill was okay, but elements of that kill was used throughout the movie leaving me wanting more. The backstory wasn't as impactful as hoped and the ending was just okay

Overall, this is an average to below average addition to the horror genre. I would score this a 4/10 and recommend skipping it.
  • kevin_robbins
  • 15 apr 2023
  • Permalink
1/10

Very boring

Very Boring and slow moving it's not really scary. It's Not really worth the time. Poor acting and poorly written script in my opinion. I'm into more action with some jumps and scares real horror stuff. Couldn't watch without fast forward. If you're looking for something interesting you should skip this it's not good. Like I said it's boring and way to slow to enjoy. Better off watching a classic horror movie. I suggest the invisible man or Dracula movies. The psycho movies are great. Dawn of the dead or even the walking dead are good. Wrong turn movies are good. Even Halloween and Friday the 13th.
  • dmayn93493
  • 6 mag 2023
  • Permalink

Altro da questo titolo

Altre pagine da esplorare

Visti di recente

Abilita i cookie del browser per utilizzare questa funzione. Maggiori informazioni.
Scarica l'app IMDb
Accedi per avere maggiore accessoAccedi per avere maggiore accesso
Segui IMDb sui social
Scarica l'app IMDb
Per Android e iOS
Scarica l'app IMDb
  • Aiuto
  • Indice del sito
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • Prendi in licenza i dati di IMDb
  • Sala stampa
  • Pubblicità
  • Lavoro
  • Condizioni d'uso
  • Informativa sulla privacy
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, una società Amazon

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.