Sequin in a Blue Room

This is a very fine piece of film-making. It avoids many of the clichés of gay themed films, covering territory which is fresh and engaging. It's beautifully shot and edited, although the dialogue was delivered in a slow hesitant manner which was initially off-putting, but actually suited the mood of the film. It follows a very young gay man who unwittingly puts himself in some potentially dangerous situations. It is surprisingly successful as a suspenseful thriller, but quite unlike any thriller I've seen before, gay or mainstream. Being such an original and unusual approach to gay film, I'm sure it will polarise viewers (as is evidenced by some of the dismissive reviews) but for those who genuinely admire cinema, and are looking for something beyond coming-out stories and an endless supply of boy-meets-boy stories, this film offers a great deal. Very impressive; I'm looking forward to seeing more from this team.

This is a really refreshing Australian made gay film, with a well written script, plot and great acting. I was pleasantly surprised with this film, since we don't see many Australian made gay films of this calibre. This film explores the theme of fantasy/projection/desire vs reality. The reviewer eelen-seth has already posted an excellent review of "Sequin in a Blue Room", so there's no need to repeat - I concur with what they said!

I highly recommend all young gay men watch this film, because there is a life lesson to be learnt in "Sequin in a Blue Room", in the age of digital sex. It's OK to have fun and explore new things in life, but remember to stay grounded at the end of the day, so you don't end up in the mess that Sequin did.

I'm looking forward to buying a copy of this movie for me collection, because I'll definitely be wanting to watch it again and again. Well done to the makers and actors in this film.

Director Samuel Van Grinsven's first feature explores a 16-year-old's sexual encounters that turn awry, in coming-of-age turned into thriller Sequin in a Blue Room, which won the audience award last month at Sydney Film Festival.

Sequin in a Blue Room tells the story of Sequin (named after the crop top he always wears when having sex), a gay teenager looking for sex with older men. Sequin (Conor Leach) lives in Sydney and mostly spends his time on hookup-apps looking for potential fun, while his family and friends don't have a clue what happens when they're not looking. Van Grinsven's queer film is one for the ages and sketches a very modern tale of what it's like to grow up in the age of social media.

One of the main characters of the film isn't one in the flesh, but rather one on screen in the form of text and visuals. Chris Johns' motion graphics never become overpowering and guide us through the story that develops under Sequin's thumbs, scrolling through lists of nameless yet labelled headless torsos. Sex and fear go hand in hand, and that's just what thrills the young man, blocking whomever he's met just after each encounter.

The title cards which are very present in the film, count down to the ending of the story. But the one that sticks the most is its opening sentence - 'a homosexual film by Samuel Van Grinsven'. Editor Tim Guthrie and the director wanted to pay tribute to Gregg Araki's New Queer Cinema, where Van Grinsven got his inspiration from. The cinematography by Jay Grant is mostly spellbinding and pulls you in by his use of colour, neon lights and closeups.

Here is where newcomer Leach comes up in full force. This fresh face plays Sequin with such confidence, you'd say he is this character in real life. Face acting galore, giving the right amount of looks and smirks to tell his story without even making a sound most of the time. This queer coming-of-age story turns dark while Sequin looks for love in a hopeless place when attending a sex-party in the titular location. Being mesmerised by a young man (Samuel Barrie), a married man (Ed Wightman) he met earlier becomes concerned with Sequin's reckless behaviour and turns into a threat that won't go away.

Co-written by Jory Anast, we also get to explore the relationship between Sequin and his unsuspecting father (Jeremy Lindsay Taylor). The boy isolates himself indoors, to which his father becomes more and more concerned there's more going on than just puberty happening under his roof.

After screening at Sydney Film Festival, where it received the audience award for best feature, the film is now headed for OutFest in Los Angeles to then screen at Melbourne International Film Fest in August. I had the opportunity to interview Van Grinsven and have a chat about the film and his plans with it, don't expect this talented filmmaker to slow down anytime soon. He clearly knows how to blend different genres while making a narrative that isn't overloaded with dialogue. I can't wait to see what Samuel has in store for us, but saying I'm excited is an understatement. Sequin in a Blue Room is New Queer Cinema at its finest.

3/10.

The film is quite slow, confusing and a bit vague because the characters and the plot are not really explained to us, it could have been much better, BUT I think it would be worth watching because it has and sends a huge message. First, the awareness of the LGBT population is raised and that everyone has the right to love and sleep with whomever they want, to be their own, without anyone judging them. We accept people as they are and divide them only into the good and the bad. The second is that a sparrow is better in the hand than a dove on a branch. And the third is that we should always be what we are but not forget to walk the earth. I also really liked the ending.

Interesting story, although nothing knew, but lacking in execution. Beautifully shot but with long, boring scenes, often without dialogue, tempted me to fast-forward. Lost interest in the main character and his story half way through.

Ultimately, watching nicely shot scenes one after the other without structure or pace wasn't very satisfying. Strangely enough, the actor playing the main character's father was far too hot of a hunk to be a convincing caring father figure. He would have been more suitable playing one of his son's sex-dates.

The main reason why I stopped watching half way through was the obnoxious main character. Not sure if it was the character as such or the actor but I ended up hating him and wanting to punch him in the face. His arrogant demeanour and smug grin was too off-putting to continue with this snoozefest.