VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,6/10
14.820
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
La comica Andrea Singer ha sempre preferito la carriera all'amore... finché non ha incontrato l'uomo perfetto. Sulla carta sembra non avere difetti, ma forse le apparenze ingannano?La comica Andrea Singer ha sempre preferito la carriera all'amore... finché non ha incontrato l'uomo perfetto. Sulla carta sembra non avere difetti, ma forse le apparenze ingannano?La comica Andrea Singer ha sempre preferito la carriera all'amore... finché non ha incontrato l'uomo perfetto. Sulla carta sembra non avere difetti, ma forse le apparenze ingannano?
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Christopher Nicholas Smith
- Director
- (as Chris N Smith)
Nick Waters
- Bartender
- (as Nicholas Waters)
Recensioni in evidenza
5/10 - definitely not the rom-com I was expecting when I hit play on Netflix, but despite everyone involved's best efforts, this one just does not stand out as anything remarkable and most of the jokes seemed to fall flat (at least for me)
Good watch, could watch again, and can recommend.
This is one was a little spoiled for me as I heard a podcast discussion on the real story, and then the slightly refined comedy routine on it.
Seeing those things come to life as a movie, I kind of knew the whole plot, which is just how it is with real life stories.
While I'm super happy Iliza got to have her story told, there was an opportunity to turn this into something spectacularly absurd.
("Tusk" was also based off a real story, from a discussion on a podcast but I'm still waiting on "Moose Jaws" (It's "Jaws", but with a moose.), so who knows.)
I think this is a great "chick flick", a great "woman empowerment" movie, and good venture into....not sure what to call it, an "anti-romantic comedy"?
I'm honestly hoping we get more movies with this sort of structure.
This is one was a little spoiled for me as I heard a podcast discussion on the real story, and then the slightly refined comedy routine on it.
Seeing those things come to life as a movie, I kind of knew the whole plot, which is just how it is with real life stories.
While I'm super happy Iliza got to have her story told, there was an opportunity to turn this into something spectacularly absurd.
("Tusk" was also based off a real story, from a discussion on a podcast but I'm still waiting on "Moose Jaws" (It's "Jaws", but with a moose.), so who knows.)
I think this is a great "chick flick", a great "woman empowerment" movie, and good venture into....not sure what to call it, an "anti-romantic comedy"?
I'm honestly hoping we get more movies with this sort of structure.
I wanted to like this movie but it was a rough watch. The jokes felt a bit lazy, the scenes too exaggerated, and the ending felt unrealistic and as though it was simply trying too hard.
I heard Iliza Shlesinger on The Joe Rogan Experience recently promoting this movie. She talked about the real-life events that led to the movie being written. I remember after she told the story thinking, that's an interesting story but how is it enough to justify making a movie out of? It sounds like the plot of the very laziest Lifetime movie. Sure enough that's pretty much how the film comes across.
I may be mistaken but I don't remember seeing a movie inter-spliced with stand-up comedy before. I've certainly seen it in sit-coms like 'Seinfeld' and 'Louie', and it works reasonably well there, but to do it in a movie seems strange. Particularly considering none of the stand-up is in any way funny. Surely if you're going to do that you want to be putting your best stuff out there, right? And I think that's the biggest crime this movie commits - it's written by a comedian, and is still never once funny.
It's not all terrible though. I found Shlesinger and Ryan Hansen watchable enough in the leads, and some of the side characters have the odd moment of interest. There's the odd intriguing scene too, like the one set on a golf course (although that could just be down to me liking golf). 'Good on Paper' was a film that I should've hated immensely, but instead sat there only mildly bored for 90 minutes. I can't put my finger on what that was down to exactly. This isn't one I'd recommend all the same. 5/10.
I may be mistaken but I don't remember seeing a movie inter-spliced with stand-up comedy before. I've certainly seen it in sit-coms like 'Seinfeld' and 'Louie', and it works reasonably well there, but to do it in a movie seems strange. Particularly considering none of the stand-up is in any way funny. Surely if you're going to do that you want to be putting your best stuff out there, right? And I think that's the biggest crime this movie commits - it's written by a comedian, and is still never once funny.
It's not all terrible though. I found Shlesinger and Ryan Hansen watchable enough in the leads, and some of the side characters have the odd moment of interest. There's the odd intriguing scene too, like the one set on a golf course (although that could just be down to me liking golf). 'Good on Paper' was a film that I should've hated immensely, but instead sat there only mildly bored for 90 minutes. I can't put my finger on what that was down to exactly. This isn't one I'd recommend all the same. 5/10.
I have no idea who Iliza is so I came to this movie with no pre-conceived notions.
It actually deserves more than the 5.6 it's currently getting.
Well written and acted and directed on a shoestring budget.
Moves along quickly and is never boring. Some goot haha's thru out.
Doent have the typical car chase dumb Hollywood ending and that's a good thing.
It actually deserves more than the 5.6 it's currently getting.
Well written and acted and directed on a shoestring budget.
Moves along quickly and is never boring. Some goot haha's thru out.
Doent have the typical car chase dumb Hollywood ending and that's a good thing.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizRyan Hansen wore fake teeth to change his appearance and padding around his abdomen to make him look like he had a belly and a body double was used in the pool scene.
- BlooperAssault cases are Government vs Defendant, not Claimant vs Respondent as in fraud cases, so Dennis would merely have been a witness rather than a claimant.
- Colonne sonoreWatch Out
Written by Christopher Crawford, Sierra Haager
Performed by clintongore
Courtesy of Music Bed
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Good on Paper?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Amor de cuento
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 32min(92 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti