Dramma della seconda guerra mondiale incentrato sulla vita delle persone comuni colpite dalla guerra.Dramma della seconda guerra mondiale incentrato sulla vita delle persone comuni colpite dalla guerra.Dramma della seconda guerra mondiale incentrato sulla vita delle persone comuni colpite dalla guerra.
- Premi
- 6 candidature totali
Sfoglia gli episodi
Recensioni in evidenza
Nice to see the polish side of the story and how horrifying it all was. Glad the bbc used well known polish actors rather than British actors with accents. Lends an authenticity to proceedings. Well acted throughout and great to see heavyweights like Helen hunt and Sean bean and Lesley Manville in tv
World On Fire has its strengths and weaknesses. That's true of any show, but it's more difficult to overlook the (numerous and glaring) weaknesses if you have knowledge about World War II and the legitimate history.
The positive is that there is a large focus on Poland, something which is so frequently overlooked when in comes to WW II history in Britain and America. The writers have some big plot holes, from the story of the young refugee - somehow his rescuer is able to keep it a secret & say next to nothing to anyone. Frankly, he does that throughout the series to the point that it gets stupid.
I do like the idea of the way they're using characters in different countries and then tying them together as the series goes on. The biggest drawback is that you get the idea that writers have forgotten about or have too many characters of whom to keep track and in turn, parts where they come together can feel forced and there isn't the character development one would hope to see.
The biggest flaw in this series is the way the writers appear to re-write large parts of history to make it more palatable for the Gen Z crowd. Unlike true period dramas like SAS Rogue Heroes and Call The Midwife, World On Fire is lost between its desire to engage in a show about the war and a desire to combine it with a heavier dose of views you'd see in 2019 rather than 1939. Rather than staying true to the time, the writers stray and in turn, parts veer in to melodrama. They produce big, explosive war scenes, but only some of them feel appropriate. A storyline with a German child takes a turn that doesn't feel at all in character for what we've seen thus far.
The women, save for the main character's mother, are straight out of this decade & it can be almost distracting. You also very much get the idea that they're trying to hit a diversity quota without actually tackling the biggest population that was destroyed at the hands of the Nazis: Jewish people.
On one hand, it's yes, it's fiction, however, the number of Polish and French Jews who lost their lives are almost a side note. They show them, but most don't have any real story focused on them. For such a major historic event that nearly wiped out a population, it's almost a crime not to have a strong main character that is Jewish.
In a bizarre way, World On Fire is what I can imagine the outcome should someone who loved Gossip Girl and The Vampire Diaries come up with if they chose to make a current period drama about World War II. This show isn't terrible, but the lack of accuracy when it's trying to be so serious can make for an unsettling watch.
If you have little or no knowledge of history, you'll probably enjoy World On Fire. If you were born in 1999 or later, this was probably written for you. On the whole I recommend it so long as you understand & don't mind the above caveats.
The positive is that there is a large focus on Poland, something which is so frequently overlooked when in comes to WW II history in Britain and America. The writers have some big plot holes, from the story of the young refugee - somehow his rescuer is able to keep it a secret & say next to nothing to anyone. Frankly, he does that throughout the series to the point that it gets stupid.
I do like the idea of the way they're using characters in different countries and then tying them together as the series goes on. The biggest drawback is that you get the idea that writers have forgotten about or have too many characters of whom to keep track and in turn, parts where they come together can feel forced and there isn't the character development one would hope to see.
The biggest flaw in this series is the way the writers appear to re-write large parts of history to make it more palatable for the Gen Z crowd. Unlike true period dramas like SAS Rogue Heroes and Call The Midwife, World On Fire is lost between its desire to engage in a show about the war and a desire to combine it with a heavier dose of views you'd see in 2019 rather than 1939. Rather than staying true to the time, the writers stray and in turn, parts veer in to melodrama. They produce big, explosive war scenes, but only some of them feel appropriate. A storyline with a German child takes a turn that doesn't feel at all in character for what we've seen thus far.
The women, save for the main character's mother, are straight out of this decade & it can be almost distracting. You also very much get the idea that they're trying to hit a diversity quota without actually tackling the biggest population that was destroyed at the hands of the Nazis: Jewish people.
On one hand, it's yes, it's fiction, however, the number of Polish and French Jews who lost their lives are almost a side note. They show them, but most don't have any real story focused on them. For such a major historic event that nearly wiped out a population, it's almost a crime not to have a strong main character that is Jewish.
In a bizarre way, World On Fire is what I can imagine the outcome should someone who loved Gossip Girl and The Vampire Diaries come up with if they chose to make a current period drama about World War II. This show isn't terrible, but the lack of accuracy when it's trying to be so serious can make for an unsettling watch.
If you have little or no knowledge of history, you'll probably enjoy World On Fire. If you were born in 1999 or later, this was probably written for you. On the whole I recommend it so long as you understand & don't mind the above caveats.
This well intentioned series surprises in some ways. After seeming cliched at first the characters surprise with some unexpectedly interesting stories that cover unfamiliar WW2 movie ground. The Polish point of view at the beginning of the war is interesting. The triangle between the pretty Manchester singer, the feisty Polish resistance fighter and the soldier translator caught in between is quite amusing. The best story is the initially nasty Mother of the guy and how she comes round to the working class Sean Bean and the Polish refugee boy. Some characters seem like forced inclusion for diversity. Like Helen Hunt's reporter concerns over euthanasia programmes and the gay doctor and his lover. Some "modern" themes of shell shock and doubt are portrayed here. No comic book super heroes here.
It takes some concentration to get used to the different characters but once you get them sorted out it's quite good.
Of the cast Leslie Manville stands out. The Polish actress who plays the resistance fighter is convincing and authentic. Jonah Hauer King looks like he comes straight from a WW2 poster. The cast is fine but the directing could be more clear. Another fault is the Manchester accents of some of the cast are too thick to understand.
Surprisingly well made and engrossing.
It takes some concentration to get used to the different characters but once you get them sorted out it's quite good.
Of the cast Leslie Manville stands out. The Polish actress who plays the resistance fighter is convincing and authentic. Jonah Hauer King looks like he comes straight from a WW2 poster. The cast is fine but the directing could be more clear. Another fault is the Manchester accents of some of the cast are too thick to understand.
Surprisingly well made and engrossing.
Season 1 was something to watch when you felt like a WW2 drama that included a bit of everything, but it wasn't engrossing, and I even forgot to watch the end of the series.
Then season 2 arrived. Whatever happened in the years between I'm not sure, but the dialogue is just woeful, and the production seems like it was all done on the cheap - the desert scenes looked like they were made on a movie lot in the 50s, and I thought the gestarpo interrogation scenes were part of some comedy skit!
There were so many different story lines going on at the same time with no connection it just all felt very disjointed.
I'm not sure if it was the characters or the people playing them but they were pretty annoying a lot of the time. The only part worth watching was with Lesley Manville - and now Mark Bonnar has appeared I'm hoping it might get better.
Then season 2 arrived. Whatever happened in the years between I'm not sure, but the dialogue is just woeful, and the production seems like it was all done on the cheap - the desert scenes looked like they were made on a movie lot in the 50s, and I thought the gestarpo interrogation scenes were part of some comedy skit!
There were so many different story lines going on at the same time with no connection it just all felt very disjointed.
I'm not sure if it was the characters or the people playing them but they were pretty annoying a lot of the time. The only part worth watching was with Lesley Manville - and now Mark Bonnar has appeared I'm hoping it might get better.
Below the line is my original post.
I've just finished episode 4, and I've lowered my rating to a "2/10". Unbelievable that they've obviously used writers that have *zero* knowledge of basic warfare, or tactics of WWII. The British soldiers are portrayed as unorganised idiots that are so happy-go-lucky that they keep getting surprised by Germans because they don't even post sentries! For the record, at the beginning of the war, Brits were fierce warriors, even though severely outgunned.
The Germans in Poland keep falling for the female bait to their doom, but there's no retaliation against the innocent citizens?!
Oh, it's getting very, very bad, and not even Sean Bean can help this one.
I'll keep watching, but *only* because there's three episodes left.
Original.....................................................................................V
I was quite stoked for this after the first episode, even excusing some of the bad writing. I gave it a generous "9".
After the second episode, it's obvious that the men are weak, bumbling incompetents.
All the women are the leaders, strong, defiant, organized, and in charge.
Too bad that Hollywood has corrupted British film makers...
My rating slid to "5" stars, I'll adjust as necessary as the series progresses.
I've just finished episode 4, and I've lowered my rating to a "2/10". Unbelievable that they've obviously used writers that have *zero* knowledge of basic warfare, or tactics of WWII. The British soldiers are portrayed as unorganised idiots that are so happy-go-lucky that they keep getting surprised by Germans because they don't even post sentries! For the record, at the beginning of the war, Brits were fierce warriors, even though severely outgunned.
The Germans in Poland keep falling for the female bait to their doom, but there's no retaliation against the innocent citizens?!
Oh, it's getting very, very bad, and not even Sean Bean can help this one.
I'll keep watching, but *only* because there's three episodes left.
Original.....................................................................................V
I was quite stoked for this after the first episode, even excusing some of the bad writing. I gave it a generous "9".
After the second episode, it's obvious that the men are weak, bumbling incompetents.
All the women are the leaders, strong, defiant, organized, and in charge.
Too bad that Hollywood has corrupted British film makers...
My rating slid to "5" stars, I'll adjust as necessary as the series progresses.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe weaponry in the Danzig Post Office is, in part, wrong. The Poles used their version of the American Browning Automatic Rifle (BAR). The program armed them with British BREN guns.
- BlooperThe characters of Kasia and her mother are listed in the credits with the surname Tomaszeski. However, as women their name in Polish would be Tomaszeska.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How many seasons does World on Fire have?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione57 minuti
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
What was the official certification given to World on Fire (2019) in Canada?
Rispondi