Uno sguardo cronologico alla caduta della dinastia dei Romanov in Russia.Uno sguardo cronologico alla caduta della dinastia dei Romanov in Russia.Uno sguardo cronologico alla caduta della dinastia dei Romanov in Russia.
Sfoglia gli episodi
Recensioni in evidenza
Why is Netflix is so obsessed with unnecessary sex scenes that adds nothing to the story?! The format was fine with me of having interjections of context along the the story as was the mediocre acting skills. The lavish production and costumes were great and reminded us of many sights and sites we saw while in Russia. As to historical accuracy, no one should ever rely on or expect historical accuracy in productions of this type. But the series certainly did paint an accurate picture of the mood that existed in Russia at that time and the precursors to the ultimate death of the Czar as well as the end of the political structure and of course, the rise of Communism. We know what sex looks like though Netflix, so enough already!
The problem with "The Last Czars" is that the creators couldn't decide on what they wanted this series to be. So instead of making a decision, they tried everything, and by doing this, they only succeeded in achieving mediocrity. The whole thing just missed some heart.
What they did wrong: * You make it into a drama-historical serie or into a docu-serie. Both together work against each other. You lose all the momentum when you cut to historical narrators who give context to the story.
* English accents in a very Russian enviroment doesn't work for me.
* Dialogue missed depth. Had the hardest time getting invested in the Romanov's.
*Visual effects were very poor (few shots of explosions, ships or train were not up to standards)
The good: * Historical correct! Costumes, sets were absolutely on point.
* A great story that needed to be told, but deserved a better translation.
In the end, if production would have been comparable to "The Crown", this would have been a great succes. Missed opportunity, what a shame! Nevertheless I watched the whole serie in two days. If you are interested in this kind of historical facts, this serie really deliver on historical facts. So I would still recommend watching it.
What they did wrong: * You make it into a drama-historical serie or into a docu-serie. Both together work against each other. You lose all the momentum when you cut to historical narrators who give context to the story.
* English accents in a very Russian enviroment doesn't work for me.
* Dialogue missed depth. Had the hardest time getting invested in the Romanov's.
*Visual effects were very poor (few shots of explosions, ships or train were not up to standards)
The good: * Historical correct! Costumes, sets were absolutely on point.
* A great story that needed to be told, but deserved a better translation.
In the end, if production would have been comparable to "The Crown", this would have been a great succes. Missed opportunity, what a shame! Nevertheless I watched the whole serie in two days. If you are interested in this kind of historical facts, this serie really deliver on historical facts. So I would still recommend watching it.
I'm surprised a lot of reviewers are not a fan of the commentary in between scenes. I however, loved this combination. I am a fan of history and when watching historical series or films I tend to google while watching because a lot of questions pop up in my head. This time I didn't need to do that, because all I ever wanted to know was told and explained in the series.
I think they created the right atmosphere and the music at the beginning is perfect to set the tone.
I watched all episodes in one go and was sad when I had finished them. Great acting as well. The historians in the series were perfectly cast by the way, they were really telling the story with emotion. This was a history class on steroids. Well done!
I think they created the right atmosphere and the music at the beginning is perfect to set the tone.
I watched all episodes in one go and was sad when I had finished them. Great acting as well. The historians in the series were perfectly cast by the way, they were really telling the story with emotion. This was a history class on steroids. Well done!
While I understand the frequent scholarly interruptions may produce a less slick viewing experience, the historical interjections are completely necessary to understand the motivations and actions during this period of history. A sterile, Disney movie could have been produced I suppose, but the university scholars and authors make this series credible and closer to the historical record. The acting is not A grade, but it is more than competent to tell this story. The costumes are excellent.
Take this series for the great history it reveals folks!
I admit, after its end, many frustrations are too fresh in my case. It can be defined as average serie. But the Romanovs deserves more than a too subjective history lesson, putting at the wall people out of their historical context. It is a sketch, not an inspired one. And this represents the basic error. The second big mistakes - the actors. Few are good and their acting represents what you expect. The majority... . Maybe, not their fault but the desire to give a panorama and to explain to much, from high subjectivity level. Short, maybe, an average serie. In my case,
Lo sapevi?
- QuizNicholas II had a dragon tattoo in real life.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How many seasons does The Last Czars have?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
What is the Canadian French language plot outline for Gli ultimi zar (2019)?
Rispondi