Una donna sopravvive a un trapianto di cuore e inizia a sviluppare tratti della personalità diversi.Una donna sopravvive a un trapianto di cuore e inizia a sviluppare tratti della personalità diversi.Una donna sopravvive a un trapianto di cuore e inizia a sviluppare tratti della personalità diversi.
Sfoglia gli episodi
Recensioni in evidenza
I think the series could be interesting if the main actress wasn't so dead in the eyes and just generally really bad at acting. She has such a limited range of expressions and emotions, it makes it horrible to enjoy the story.
You have to accept quite a mixture of supernatural and also biblical ideas in order to be able to go along with the movie. If your mind gets triggered every time a ghost-like entity takes some action on screen then you will most likely not be happy here, I can recommend 'tabula rasa' for you, it's also not a shining monument of a TV-series, but it is better than Chambers.
Ok, let's say we go along with all the new-age philosophy of the series. Is it then good?
The first 5 episodes bored me a bit, not because there is nothing happening, but because they re-use a lot of clichés from other horror movies. The series looks like something we have seen again and again.
But this changes by the end of episode 5, where a normal horror movie would have simply put a stop. It then develops more into a thriller. A good one, for a while. But episodes 9 and especially 10 were a total let-down.
The start of episode 10 is badly executed - it is something I have waited for the whole time to see, a stand-off between two characters and it is done in the most uninspired way I could imagine.
The end resolves the main plot and leaves a number of cliffhangers, just to be able to make a second series.
One more thing that bothers me a bit is that the series wants to be for teens, twens and older people as well - which would be ok, but it tries to deliver something for every age group and that just leads to a number of scenes where I feel embarrassed by watching them.
In summare:
So all in all I give it 6 stars, just to be fair, but it has a strong tendency towards 5.
Ok, let's say we go along with all the new-age philosophy of the series. Is it then good?
The first 5 episodes bored me a bit, not because there is nothing happening, but because they re-use a lot of clichés from other horror movies. The series looks like something we have seen again and again.
But this changes by the end of episode 5, where a normal horror movie would have simply put a stop. It then develops more into a thriller. A good one, for a while. But episodes 9 and especially 10 were a total let-down.
The start of episode 10 is badly executed - it is something I have waited for the whole time to see, a stand-off between two characters and it is done in the most uninspired way I could imagine.
The end resolves the main plot and leaves a number of cliffhangers, just to be able to make a second series.
One more thing that bothers me a bit is that the series wants to be for teens, twens and older people as well - which would be ok, but it tries to deliver something for every age group and that just leads to a number of scenes where I feel embarrassed by watching them.
In summare:
- bad: new-age spirtual nonsens
- very bad: beginning of episode 10
- bad: most likely should have been a pure teen-series, but tries to be more
- very good: how it all changed in episode 5
- good: acting
- good: one doesn't know which character is good/bad for a long time
So all in all I give it 6 stars, just to be fair, but it has a strong tendency towards 5.
People complaining that its a slow burner, guys it takes some time to build a story. Never been a fan of slow burners, but this show changed my choice. It's a nail biting show, with twists at any point of time, episodes end at a point where it makes you think what happens next.
Slow at start, but gains pace with the episodes. Just now completed ep8, and it plays with your mind. Just loved this episode. If you love watching series, this one will be a great choice.
So first of all: the actors. Yes Uma, you did good, but what's up with the twenty-year old highschoolers? The unkle? The crazy attic-lady? Wow- how people think this is good acting escapes me. I had to burst out laughing at a couple of scenes and lines.
Production value? It feels like they ran out of money after the first episode and only had money for a simple red filter that they needed to use in every "scary" scene.
The plot is the dollar shop knock-off version of "Hereditary" (which I loved), and was trying hard to be something that it is not. I will grant the three stars because I did finish it and it was a fascinating waste of Netflix money to watch in a "what are they even doing" kind of way.
Production value? It feels like they ran out of money after the first episode and only had money for a simple red filter that they needed to use in every "scary" scene.
The plot is the dollar shop knock-off version of "Hereditary" (which I loved), and was trying hard to be something that it is not. I will grant the three stars because I did finish it and it was a fascinating waste of Netflix money to watch in a "what are they even doing" kind of way.
Yes this is a slow show, but its an interesting premise and as far as I was concerned, I wanted to see its conclusion. In fact I binge watched first season. Not scary at all but I enjoyed it nonetheless.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizBig Frank makes a reference to having worked in Tent City, which he describes as a 'hellhole'. Tent City was an outdoor jail complex in Phoenix, Arizona, that was closed in 2017.
- ConnessioniFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Worst Horror TV Shows (2019)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How many seasons does Chambers have?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti