Un gruppo di esperti esamina filmati misteriosi che mostrano eventi apparentemente inspiegabili: auto che si sollevano da terra in autostrada, una statua che sembra muoversi e fiamme che app... Leggi tuttoUn gruppo di esperti esamina filmati misteriosi che mostrano eventi apparentemente inspiegabili: auto che si sollevano da terra in autostrada, una statua che sembra muoversi e fiamme che appaiono dal nulla.Un gruppo di esperti esamina filmati misteriosi che mostrano eventi apparentemente inspiegabili: auto che si sollevano da terra in autostrada, una statua che sembra muoversi e fiamme che appaiono dal nulla.
Sfoglia gli episodi
Recensioni in evidenza
With all of the mind numbing drivel that is on TV these days, the science channel USED to be the place you could go that had shows with some form of intelligence. Strange evidence just shows that the science channel has succumb to the ignorance of the masses. Not only are the "theories" they come up with utter nonsense that even a 5 yr old could see through, their facts are just downright wrong!!! I just heard them say with one of these ridiculous theories regarding a giant spider web that black widows kill 7 people a year. That is just PLAIN WRONG!!!!! Is anyone actually fact checking the stories? Not to mention anyone, esp a biologist being interviewed, that knows anything about spiders knows it couldn't possibly be a black widow web. But I guess it's all about what sells and the science channel is becoming no different than all the other garbage that is on these days. So sad....
This program is insulting to the field of SCIENCE.
And by being that it is insulting to the people, viewers, that made the Science Channel a quality network.
It appears that the producer/s of this show are trying to draw a certain type of viewer, while hoping that their existing viewers will remain. Well, this program is not succeeding at keeping existing viewers like me. If this channel, network, keeps inviting fans of baseless, fact-less, and ridiculous "conspiracy theories", then they are going to lose their fan base and current viewers. But then, maybe the Science Channel has calculated that there are more "conspiracy theory" gullibles and that the SC would rather have those types of fans.
The "experts" on this show should consider how this show is ruining their reputations. The producers of this show get these "experts" to make the most ridiculous, nonsensical, and downright STUPID comments about, "What could this be? It looks like it might be aliens or monsters!?"
WTF are you doing Science Channel? You've been showing this stupid program for about 3 years now. And there is another show that insults a viewers intelligence on this network. It's called, 'What on Earth?" This show uses the same ridiculous nonsense and idiocy spewed by "experts" about places on Earth that are spotted by satellite cameras. Just like "Strange Evidence", there are so called "experts". All of these "experts" are obviously told to make the stupidest questions and statements that NO EXPERT in their scientific field would ever consider or make.
The Science Channel is starting to go down the same road of idiocy and stupidity that the History channel and Discovery have gone down. History channel should be renamed to the "Ancient Alien Theorists" channel. And if so, then is it possible that this network has been overtaken by aliens? Ancient alien theorists say, "YES!" Well of course they do.
I, and others who have functioning brains, expect a network called, "Science", to actually provide programs and shows that are based on actual fact based, researched, and reality based information. These types of programs have no redeeming value. The only thing these stupid programs can do is to give conspiracy theorists, and "alternative facts" believers something they can attach to, to make themselves feel that they are "right".
It appears that the producer/s of this show are trying to draw a certain type of viewer, while hoping that their existing viewers will remain. Well, this program is not succeeding at keeping existing viewers like me. If this channel, network, keeps inviting fans of baseless, fact-less, and ridiculous "conspiracy theories", then they are going to lose their fan base and current viewers. But then, maybe the Science Channel has calculated that there are more "conspiracy theory" gullibles and that the SC would rather have those types of fans.
The "experts" on this show should consider how this show is ruining their reputations. The producers of this show get these "experts" to make the most ridiculous, nonsensical, and downright STUPID comments about, "What could this be? It looks like it might be aliens or monsters!?"
WTF are you doing Science Channel? You've been showing this stupid program for about 3 years now. And there is another show that insults a viewers intelligence on this network. It's called, 'What on Earth?" This show uses the same ridiculous nonsense and idiocy spewed by "experts" about places on Earth that are spotted by satellite cameras. Just like "Strange Evidence", there are so called "experts". All of these "experts" are obviously told to make the stupidest questions and statements that NO EXPERT in their scientific field would ever consider or make.
The Science Channel is starting to go down the same road of idiocy and stupidity that the History channel and Discovery have gone down. History channel should be renamed to the "Ancient Alien Theorists" channel. And if so, then is it possible that this network has been overtaken by aliens? Ancient alien theorists say, "YES!" Well of course they do.
I, and others who have functioning brains, expect a network called, "Science", to actually provide programs and shows that are based on actual fact based, researched, and reality based information. These types of programs have no redeeming value. The only thing these stupid programs can do is to give conspiracy theorists, and "alternative facts" believers something they can attach to, to make themselves feel that they are "right".
Play the entire video for christ sakes!! Let people make their own assumptions..
They do try to do their best at figuring out how the things happened, but a lot of the time their conclusions are outlandish or they don't give one at all. In particular, the one with the pack of dogs pulling apart the car - their conclusion was that the dogs were holding a grudge. Really!? My own dog pulled the grill off my own car in my own driveway. Grudge? I don't think so. Squirrel that he chased under the car? Definitely. They never showed the first part of the video. Most likely a varmot or cat ran under the car and up into the engine while trying to get away from the dogs.
Looks interested but for each mystery it just goes on and on and on, it could be aliens, it could be God, could be ghosts, then it's just a reflective light in the sky.
Then the next mystery starts and you realise I have other channels.
Lo sapevi?
- Quiz90% of the time, the "experts" have no clue what caused the weird or eerie footage, and simply leave the viewer hanging. Yet, they are "scientists". Example: footage is shown of a cemetery in Tajikistan, where all the graves are nothing but empty holes. The bodies have been removed, along with their coffins. The experts immediately dismiss grave robbers. and ponder about them being zombies rising from the dead or weather causing it, instead.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Science Friction (2022)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How many seasons does Strange Evidence have?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Evidencias insólitas
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h(60 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 16:9 HD
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti