L'età della ragione

I enjoy watching historical movies, but this one is not a great movie. Not a good narrative, each persona character is not well contoured,a lot of unnecessary sexual images. Why? I am not interested to see that. Is that a good movies because of it, trying to compensate for lack of the narrative? There are movies from 20th century ten times better. No pornographic scenes etc, good quality. Nowadays film industry is so lacking. I have expected more from a Finish movie, unfortunately, as many movies on Netflix they are made within a short time frame for money purposes. Maybe we have better cameras nowadays, but not better plots.

I lack the words to properly discribe this film. All of it is stunning and for international viewers super interesting. The film deals with the aftermath of WWII in Finland which is a fairly unexplored topic outside Finland. It's fascinating to explore the cultural, natural and socio-economic setting.

It's a movie about hard work, standing up for neighbors, perseverance, and love. In many ways, this movie has a lot in common with American Western settler movies but this one is, of course, distinctly Finnish.

I appreciate that the movie doesn't glamorize relationships, it shows the commitment and hard teamwork. The characters don't dandy around in wildflower fields on romantic picnics. Instead, we see them covered in mud, shivering in the snow, and working the land with every bit of energy they have left, complete with the zooming of mosquitos. It feels real and yet, it's absolutely beautiful in every way.

It's romance, and history, and amazing scenery, real costumes and sets, and interesting storyline. Give me more!

Its lovely simplicity is the main virtue. It is a love story and portrait of hard fight for survive. It. Inspired photography, good performances, noble message and correct definition of beginning, it is just a beautiful film.

Anni leaves a sheltered life with her wealthy family to marry and live with Veikko in North Karelia. Veikko is an orphan, lonely, badly wounded in the war but has a good heart.

Anni's love for Veikko is tested by the harsh realities of northern living and isolation that are so new to her. The strength love against odds of survival is probably one of the messages of the film.

Having said that, I do not suggest that we need profound messages to enjoy a film. Good acting, rich cinematography, era-appropriate costumes and settings, as well as expert direction, are sufficient ingredients to create a fine work of cinematic art. These ingredients are all present in Markku Pölönen's film.

A small trivia: The Shostakovich Waltz No. 2 is heard at the wedding, indicating that this piece, written in 1938 one year before the Soviet invasion of Karelia, was a hit, at least in Finland.

This is a lovely story of two people, virtually strangers, forging a new life for themselves in the wilderness. Anni is the headstrong daughter of a prosperous businessman. Veikko had been a mere lumberjack, but is now a wounded veteran of the 1939 Winter War when the Soviet Union invaded Finland. As a veteran, he is entitled to homestead a farm in the woods off in the boondocks and they proceed to do so. It is relentlessly hard work, and Veikko's health is uncertain.

According to the writer/director, the film's title in Finnish translates to "Our Own Land". This phrase (like our "40 Acres and a Mule") was the promise made to veterans, that they would get land of their own, and many new farms were homesteaded in this period.

The acting is solid, and the lead actress is radiantly convincing as a woman in love. This is a solid period piece, well worth seeing.