VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,2/10
8794
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Quando otto celebrità da tutto il mondo vengono invitate a competere in uno spettacolo online, si rendono presto conto che stanno giocando per le loro stesse vite, poiché coloro che hanno pe... Leggi tuttoQuando otto celebrità da tutto il mondo vengono invitate a competere in uno spettacolo online, si rendono presto conto che stanno giocando per le loro stesse vite, poiché coloro che hanno perso subiscono conseguenze orribili.Quando otto celebrità da tutto il mondo vengono invitate a competere in uno spettacolo online, si rendono presto conto che stanno giocando per le loro stesse vite, poiché coloro che hanno perso subiscono conseguenze orribili.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 vittoria in totale
Scotty Mac
- Vapula
- (as Scotty Schnurr Mac)
- …
Recensioni in evidenza
Funhouse (2019), directed by Jason William Lee, is a Canadian horror-thriller that blends elements of reality television with a social commentary on the extremes of entertainment culture. At its core, the film explores the dark underbelly of fame and voyeurism, presenting a disturbing, yet familiar, critique of how far people are willing to go for attention and spectacle.
Plot Overview The movie revolves around a group of international celebrities-each known for their moment of fame-who are invited to participate in a reality TV show called *Funhouse*. The catch? It's a deadly competition where the contestants must play sadistic games, and the loser of each round is brutally executed, live-streamed for the morbid entertainment of a worldwide audience. The last one standing wins a massive cash prize, but they must first survive the cruelty orchestrated by a puppet master behind the scenes.
Direction and Cinematography Jason William Lee's direction effectively captures the sleazy and exploitative tone that reflects the film's commentary on media and reality TV. The visual style is slick, with a digital sheen that complements the hyper-modern, almost dystopian setting of a reality show. However, the direction sometimes falters, leaning heavily into the more predictable tropes of modern horror, such as shock value gore and shallow characterizations.
The cinematography, handled by Shawn Seifert, is sharp and appropriately claustrophobic, heightening the tension in confined spaces. There are some standout moments of visual storytelling, such as the contrast between the glitzy exterior of the show and the brutal reality lurking beneath the surface. This effectively mirrors the way reality TV glamorizes human suffering. However, as visually competent as the film is, it lacks a distinctive or innovative style that might have elevated the experience beyond its predictable structure.
Acting and Characters The cast does a decent job with the material, but the characters themselves are thinly drawn. Each contestant is a stereotypical caricature of a celebrity archetype: a fallen pop star, a controversial YouTuber, and so on. While this is a deliberate choice to emphasize the satirical nature of the film, it ends up making it difficult to truly care about any of them. Their fates feel more like fodder for the film's violence than individuals with meaningful arcs.
As the body count rises, so does the sense of detachment from their outcomes.
Themes and Social Commentary Where *Funhouse* shines is in its thematic exploration of society's obsession with fame, violence, and desensitization to suffering. The film critiques the voyeuristic nature of reality TV, the hunger for sensationalism, and the increasing normalization of cruelty in digital spaces. These ideas are highly relevant in today's media landscape, where reality shows push boundaries, and social media thrives on public humiliation and outrage.
Gore and Horror Elements For fans of the horror genre, particularly those who enjoy survival horror and gore, *Funhouse* delivers on its promise of shocking violence. The deaths are creative in their brutality, and the tension builds effectively in some of the elimination sequences. However, the film relies too heavily on these moments to sustain interest, which can make the overall experience feel repetitive.
Conclusion *Funhouse* is a competent but flawed horror film that offers a scathing, if somewhat shallow, critique of media consumption and the dark side of reality television. While its thematic ambitions are clear, the execution often feels derivative and lacks the nuance to fully engage its audience beyond surface-level thrills. For those intrigued by the concept of a twisted, *Black Mirror*-esque game show, it provides some gruesome entertainment, but it ultimately fails to break new ground in the horror genre.
Plot Overview The movie revolves around a group of international celebrities-each known for their moment of fame-who are invited to participate in a reality TV show called *Funhouse*. The catch? It's a deadly competition where the contestants must play sadistic games, and the loser of each round is brutally executed, live-streamed for the morbid entertainment of a worldwide audience. The last one standing wins a massive cash prize, but they must first survive the cruelty orchestrated by a puppet master behind the scenes.
Direction and Cinematography Jason William Lee's direction effectively captures the sleazy and exploitative tone that reflects the film's commentary on media and reality TV. The visual style is slick, with a digital sheen that complements the hyper-modern, almost dystopian setting of a reality show. However, the direction sometimes falters, leaning heavily into the more predictable tropes of modern horror, such as shock value gore and shallow characterizations.
The cinematography, handled by Shawn Seifert, is sharp and appropriately claustrophobic, heightening the tension in confined spaces. There are some standout moments of visual storytelling, such as the contrast between the glitzy exterior of the show and the brutal reality lurking beneath the surface. This effectively mirrors the way reality TV glamorizes human suffering. However, as visually competent as the film is, it lacks a distinctive or innovative style that might have elevated the experience beyond its predictable structure.
Acting and Characters The cast does a decent job with the material, but the characters themselves are thinly drawn. Each contestant is a stereotypical caricature of a celebrity archetype: a fallen pop star, a controversial YouTuber, and so on. While this is a deliberate choice to emphasize the satirical nature of the film, it ends up making it difficult to truly care about any of them. Their fates feel more like fodder for the film's violence than individuals with meaningful arcs.
As the body count rises, so does the sense of detachment from their outcomes.
Themes and Social Commentary Where *Funhouse* shines is in its thematic exploration of society's obsession with fame, violence, and desensitization to suffering. The film critiques the voyeuristic nature of reality TV, the hunger for sensationalism, and the increasing normalization of cruelty in digital spaces. These ideas are highly relevant in today's media landscape, where reality shows push boundaries, and social media thrives on public humiliation and outrage.
Gore and Horror Elements For fans of the horror genre, particularly those who enjoy survival horror and gore, *Funhouse* delivers on its promise of shocking violence. The deaths are creative in their brutality, and the tension builds effectively in some of the elimination sequences. However, the film relies too heavily on these moments to sustain interest, which can make the overall experience feel repetitive.
Conclusion *Funhouse* is a competent but flawed horror film that offers a scathing, if somewhat shallow, critique of media consumption and the dark side of reality television. While its thematic ambitions are clear, the execution often feels derivative and lacks the nuance to fully engage its audience beyond surface-level thrills. For those intrigued by the concept of a twisted, *Black Mirror*-esque game show, it provides some gruesome entertainment, but it ultimately fails to break new ground in the horror genre.
So it's definitely not a good movie but I will say I was entertained. You kind of know what you're getting yourself into so you can accept the lower quality of production and acting. Still enjoyable considering.
This movie tried to convey something. However, the stories used are meaningless and the characters in this movie are not representative enough. The director is ambitious but apparently he needs to dig more in humanity before he could tell an eloquent story. He wants to say that morden people are becoming coarse but this movie itself is coarse enough. Yes, the director succeeded but that success resulted in a rubbish movie. The only things I can remember are an uglified panda and so many children watching a bloody live stream.
An international cast of not-horrible actors. A seemingly thoughtful script with something to do with internet celebrity. A competitive reality show with real and inventive elimination challenges. The ending gets very twisty. It's got masked henchmen. And a villain rocking an Eldredge knot tie.
I was invested throughout.
.
I was invested throughout.
.
I would have given this a high score if it wasn't for the atrocious acting. Luckily the worst actor died first.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizAll the contestants share nationalities with their respective actors.
- BlooperWhen Ula loses voting contest, the amount of all players is more than100%, actually it is 134%.
- Citazioni
James 'Headstone' Malone: The bold will die, as will the strong. As legends, we go on.
- ConnessioniReferences The Friendly Ghost (1945)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 507 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 251 USD
- 30 mag 2021
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 110.571 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 46min(106 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2:1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti