UFOs: The Lost Evidence

From 1901-1964 Stonehedge was (re)built using cranes. For decades the official Stonehenge guidebooks have been full of fascinating facts and figures and theories surrounding the world's greatest prehistoric monument. What the glossy brochures do not mention, however, is the systematic rebuilding of the 4,000 year old stone circle throughout the 20th Century.

This is one of the dark secrets of history archaeologists don't talk about: The day they had the builders in at Stonehenge to recreate the most famous ancient monument in Britain as they thought it ought to look.

Where do they find these bozos (both commenters and interviewees)? I would love to ask just one question: Nearly all of the 'evidence' is crap from decades ago, when a camera was not something carried by everyone 24/7, and required a fairly long process to even get ready to shoot. Today nearly every planetary resident capable of standing on two legs is carrying a mobile device that is as close to automatic as ever produced, yet there seems to be a complete lack of any recent photography of aliens, UFOs, or anything else of that ilk. Geez, one would think that someone would get one, even by accident, during the billions of selfies taken every day. I am soooo fed up with the over-dramatized drivel foisted on us, masquerading as 'science' - this isn't the only piece of crap being sent our way by what was once the 'education' channels. I assume that Millennials in general have IQ levels equal to (or even higher) than previous generations, but apparently only put in enough effort to utilize around half of whatever that number is. Steer clear of any show with 'UFO', 'NASA', or the words "mystery', 'revealed', or 'unexplained' in the title and you stand at least a 50/50 chance of not having your intelligence insult very 3 or 4 minutes.

Nice to see some questions being presented with different and far more believable answers than current theories. At the end of the day, we don't really know what happened in the past, but the ancient astronaut theories seem the most probable. Watch with an open mind and ignore the skeptics whose reviews seem so angry and malicious.

I'm really impressed with the fact that the producers have gone back and reworked information from older sightings. Hearing from the original people involved gives these events added credibility. The Rendlesham forest incident as told by the former deputy base commander of that NATO base lent a LOT of credibility to that event. The producers seem to have taken care to add additional info to these events.

While there are a few nifty pieces presented here and there, much of this series is about UFO conspiracy theorists jumping to conclusions.

A possible submarine off the coast of Sweden? Extra-terresttrials! The Russians deny it was them? Aliens from another planet! (I mean, why would the Russians possibly deny having a submarine in NATO waters?)

The guy from theblackvault is probably the only level headed one. That Dolan guy is a bit of a hot-headed nut who will attack if his "everything is an alien" belief is challenged.

It's these types of people that set back the whole "what are UFOs?" question back to the crazy ages.