Top 10: sfida alla scienza

Basically just the first paragraph of any wikipedia entry. Everything is like, "he was last seen drowning in the ocean.... But did he really drown..... Or was is something more sinister. Chinese submarine? Aliens? Sentient yogurt?". You get the idea.

When you guys say shaman it's pronounce as if it's an o not an a so shaman as if it's an o or like you're saying Sean Shaw or long you realize how you say long just saying pronunciation is a big play watched a lot of your guys's shows you guys putting out stuff very wrong and it's very just disrespectful

I'm really not comfortable with this 'documentary' - it asserts all these odd beliefs without offering balance, e.g. an expert explaining what scientific consensus is, or a representative from a state government being accused of some cover-up.

It's for this reason that I think it's deliberately targeted at neurotic people; those who are essentially vulnerable and worry about the truth of the world around them.

I genuinely think this programme could exacerbate issues for vulnerable people and therefore there's ethical questions about how its content in various places

Hey, idiots who made this. You're either stupid or expecting your audience to be stupid, but I barely made it through episode one before I was hit with so many historical inaccuracies that I almost passed out. Remember Agent 355? Didn't you have her placed during the Rev. War? Then how come almost ALL your stock war/battle footage was of the American Civil War or the Mexican War? At first I though it might be a mistake, one wrong video and I could ignore it, but it continued to happen! I was blown away. Next time you make a documentary, you might want to hire people who know a thing or two about history and the time periods you are reporting on. Ridiculous.

For a start, they got the location of the village of Woolpit wrong from S2E1... Anyone with google maps could have done a better job.