[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario delle usciteI migliori 250 filmI film più popolariEsplora film per genereCampione d’incassiOrari e bigliettiNotizie sui filmFilm indiani in evidenza
    Cosa c’è in TV e in streamingLe migliori 250 serieLe serie più popolariEsplora serie per genereNotizie TV
    Cosa guardareTrailer più recentiOriginali IMDbPreferiti IMDbIn evidenza su IMDbGuida all'intrattenimento per la famigliaPodcast IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralTutti gli eventi
    Nato oggiCelebrità più popolariNotizie sulle celebrità
    Centro assistenzaZona contributoriSondaggi
Per i professionisti del settore
  • Lingua
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista Video
Accedi
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usa l'app
Indietro
  • Il Cast e la Troupe
  • Recensioni degli utenti
  • Quiz
  • Domande frequenti
IMDbPro
Werewolves of the Third Reich (2017)

Recensioni degli utenti

Werewolves of the Third Reich

54 recensioni
1/10

What werewolves?

I was hoping for some werewolve action. Unfortunately by the time you see any the movie is almost over. Also the action is not really there. I am a B-movielover. I can easily take poor effects and see the humor in it. This movie doesn't. It steals lines from 'full metal jacket' and changes them in some words. It steals from 'Inglorious basterds'. If you see fat concentrationcampvictims, roadblocks that you can drive around at but don't do, english with a bad german accent, german with a lot of words spoken wrong and macho men then you know it is better to spend you time and money on something else.
  • sandvink
  • 31 mar 2018
  • Permalink
1/10

An HONEST review

This is one of the worst movies of all time, and I use the word 'movie' generously here. And before I continue I would like to point out that I am a huge fan of the Asylum movies so I am no film snob.

I'll only talk about the first 20 mins of the film because if I write any more, I will lose the will to live.

So what happens in the first 20 mins? Absolutely nothing! No, I mean it. Nothing. Sure there are a couple of scenes but there is absolutely no point to them. We get to learn that some prisoners (more later) are going to have drugs tested on them and that's it. 30 seconds of 'important stuff' in 20 mins.

My most enjoyable bit? Overweight concentration camp prisoners. I don't think the makers of the movie studied WWII history.

The makers don't seem to know anything about Jews either since the biggest, fattest prisoner has a huge tattoo on his chest. It is pretty common knowledge that Judaism still frowns on tattoos and 70-odd years ago things would have been much stricter.

Second favourite bit? The actor chosen to play Hitler - the only prerequisite being the ability to put on a moustache as far as I could see. I look more like Hitler and I'm 6 foot, balding, and fat.

I would like to suggest watching it for the comedy value but Sharknado 5 this ain't. It is not even funny bad. It's just bad.

Rather than spend 1 hour and 34 mins watching this 'movie', I would suggest that members of IMDb use the time more wisely. I won't give any suggestions. Literally ANYTHING would be time spent more wisely.
  • ensorgiles
  • 19 dic 2017
  • Permalink
1/10

This movie is very close to complete garbage

Very low production value all the way around. Poor acting. Poor set locations. Poor props. Poor special effects. Most important of all, wretched story.

In my opinion there are many elements of this movie lifted from Inglourious Basterds. Sadly, they are poorly executed.

If you enjoy watching horrible movies and making fun of them with friends, this movie will provide plenty to critique.
  • allen-roulston
  • 20 dic 2017
  • Permalink
2/10

Where wolf? Werewolf? No wolf!

I'm an hour into this thing and there still aren't any werewolves! Dudes and dudettes! Attention! Do not by any circumstance watch this movie! The big question is, why does the guy from Philly have a southern accent?
  • mattoid-45605
  • 8 feb 2020
  • Permalink
1/10

War at the full moon

Will admit to feeling nervous about seeing 'Werewolves of the Third Reich'. The low rating and poor reviews were not promising, and too many of my recent low-budget viewings with both of those here have proven to be that bad and worse. The idea also seemed really ridiculous, even for one clearly not meant to be taken seriously and with the potential to be executed in an intelligence insulting way.

My nervousness proved after watching 'Werewolves of the Third Reich' to be justified. 'Werewolves of the Third Reich' was yet another film to be that bad, as bad as the low rating and reviews suggested, and worse. It was not only ridiculous and terribly made but also intelligence insulting to a near-offensive degree, with a huge amount to criticise and nothing to recommend. Have nothing really to add, with it said already so well, other than my thoughts.

Knowing where to begin with the criticisms is difficult. 'Werewolves of the Third Reich' looks cheap, with drab and rushed-looking photography, haphazard editing, risible visual effects that just look strange, inauthentic and shoestring budget-like costumes and far from atmospheric or spooky settings. The sound quality is intrusive and obvious and can remember little about the music other than how ill-fitting it was.

Dialogue is cheesy as sin and delivered with accents that are both stereotypical and incomprehensible and words delivered in a way that will make native Germans and those studying German cringe and feel insulted. The story is uneventful in the first act and becomes increasingly silly and implausible, as well as tension-free and lacking in coherence. The action is clumsy and dull and the direction shows no engagement or experience with the material.

Characters are irritating and little more than cartoonish caricatures. Don't let the titular creatures elevate things, they are barely in it and are poorly designed. The acting is all round awful, with lots of histrionics and bizarre miscasting (Hitler is one of the biggest dishonourable mentions).

Overall, terrible. 1/10 Bethany Cox
  • TheLittleSongbird
  • 1 ago 2018
  • Permalink
1/10

Crap

I havent seen such a trashy try to make something call a movie with crap actors.They didnt try to be like Tarantino,just they creativity and IQ didnt let them do this.Complete crap and garbage.No comments
  • tomjablonski-30367
  • 11 gen 2018
  • Permalink
1/10

Dirt poor rip off of Inglourious Basterds.

This is what happens, when fanboys a try to make films. It's not the tiny budget or the terrible accents that make this film awful. It's the obscene directorial hubris in attempting to ape Tarantino's mastery of the long tense slow-build scene.

Having said that, if you don't have a lot of money, and you're filming in the UK with British actors, why not attempt something you might actually achieve, instead of totally over reaching yourself?
  • lordforbes
  • 6 gen 2018
  • Permalink
2/10

This one doesn't even qualify as a "So bad it's gonna be good" film.

This. . . is. . . horrendous! It's obviously low budget. Very low. That in itself is certainly not a detractor. But Gawd Damn! When we "enter" Mengele's concentration camp their are exactly four young adults that are supposed to be the entire POW camp. Two men Two woman. Modern looking women with long stringy hair parted on the side. The "blond" had 5 inches of exposed dark roots. Apparently they couldn't even manage to dye her hair one way or the other. It's like they took what little they remember from high school history class and threw it in here and there and decided to mix in a bit of The Island of Dr. Moreau. This is not a compliment at all. I would recommend you save yourselves and choose something else; but you are gonna do what you're gonna do. 2 of 10 stars because I don't like to flunk people completely. ToniHunterOne aka PhaedraBlue.
  • Ten-Inch-Toni
  • 9 giu 2018
  • Permalink
2/10

It Is not a Trash Movie, It Is Garbage

The cover of "Werewolves of the Third Reich" is highly attractive and promising - and that is all. The film is not a "trash movie" (such as "Braindead", "The Toxic Avenger" or "Piranha") but a complete garbage. The story and the screenplay are laughable in the bad sense. The cast is ridiculous, highlighting the ham Lee Bane, an annoying "actor" with terrible accent. Nothing works in this movie, the special effects are worst that those from the Sci-fi Chanel and the mask of the werewolf is terrible. See the DVD cover and forget the flick. My vote is two.

Title (Brail): "Lobisomens do Terceiro Reich" ("Werewolves of the Third Reich")
  • claudio_carvalho
  • 4 mar 2019
  • Permalink
1/10

Egad...

I managed to make it through about 15 minutes of Lee Bane, who plays "Mad Dog" Murphy, channeling his inner Hugh Jackman/Wolverine, and then. I had to turn this piece of garbage off.
  • tmccull52
  • 15 mar 2020
  • Permalink
10/10

Absolutely amazing

You know, if you get past all the terrible acting, plot, and special effects it's not really that bad.
  • tylerjohnston-76420
  • 4 mag 2019
  • Permalink
7/10

A fun movie

I read the other reviews and think people take movies too seriously sometimes. this is clearly a movie which isn't taking itself seriously (the Nazis think they can win world war 2 by making werewolf soldiers!) and there are so many funny lines and larger than life characters. so I find it very hard to dislike a film which is laughing at its own silly concept. along with the humour there are some good action scenes and the opening scene in the bar is like a spaghetti western. lots to like.
  • billybaldwin-10736
  • 21 dic 2017
  • Permalink
1/10

Why, God... Why?

The "werewolves" - when they finally appear - look more like the morphed Vampires from "Buffy". This masterpiece was filmed in Wales, and the mostly Welsh cast couldn't manage to get past their Welsh accents. As an added bonus, Jonni DC, Continuity Cop, clearly went out behind the shed and ended it all, ten minutes into the first day of filming.

If someone offers you the option of either watching this, or watching paint dry in the Everglades in August... Choose the paint.
  • KarmaLysing
  • 5 gen 2021
  • Permalink
1/10

My god.

  • olivercolls
  • 18 apr 2018
  • Permalink
2/10

Review

I'm not going to delve too much into the plot or anything, but I'm having trouble understanding what it is they were trying to do here. The CGI was horrific and just plain weird, and appeared to glitch out in some parts of the movie. The cover of course looked promising but, the masks that the "werewolves" wear don't look like wolves or even dogs at all. In fact, they looked more like a Klingon than a wolf. Not to mention, the masks are exactly that, masks! In some parts of the movie, they even appeared to fall off or become unsituated on the actors face. Also, does Hitler have Parkinson's disease or what? Every time he speaks, he is shivering uncontrollably and having issues speaking coherently. I don't understand why they did that? Was Hitler this way in real life? I have never seen them give him an effect like that in any film. Not to mention the fact that, regardless of the national origins of the actors, their accents sound so incredibly fake that it's almost painful to listen to.

The cover made me excited! Too bad this was such a disappointment.
  • NerdBat
  • 13 gen 2018
  • Permalink
4/10

How did this 'gem ' make it on to Netflix?

This film was laughable ! It's like the director got a bunch of unemployed men and women and offered then a role in this film for £50 each ( no acting experience necessary ) . The director, producer, camera man , make up artist , voice coach, costumes etc were probably the same person but with different names on the credits . He probably came across his grandad's old camera from the attic and decided to make a film . And He probably shot the film in one of those reenactment sites , where people reenact certain eras and wars for a hobby,( So he didn't have to pay anything for a proper set ! )

, The Werewolves appeared towards the end of the film . Their Werewolf 'make up '.consisted of a mask that looked like it was from the pound shop . The Werewolves ( bless them ) did nothing except growl a little bit ! Lol!

Guess , it's possible to make a garbage film for approximately £1000 and have it shown on Netflix !
  • honeybloggs-69648
  • 8 nov 2021
  • Permalink
4/10

not the worst movie ever, but far from good too

  • pengwyn-449-974939
  • 30 mar 2023
  • Permalink
4/10

Right away to forgetfulness's basket!!!

I was fully deceived by DVD's cover and what the title suggested, watching almost when l've been receiving the pack, my disappointment acctualy start in first half hour and how much is getting in the middle my angry is higher, stop wasn't an option acceptable in face of my expenses to get it, remaining spend my priceless time in a trash movie, the real low budge picture survives only by nazi werewolf premise which didn't appeared usually, just in few scenes, a bad make up is clear, looks like made by a beginner, well at least the main character likes to kill nazi!!!

Resume:

First watch: 2018 / How many: 1 / Source: DVD / Rating: 4
  • elo-equipamentos
  • 5 ago 2018
  • Permalink
4/10

Don't call me Mad Dog

  • nogodnomasters
  • 6 dic 2017
  • Permalink
1/10

Waste of money

  • andershenningsen
  • 7 apr 2019
  • Permalink
8/10

Tarantino meets American Werewolf in London

Despite the obvious low budget this film is an admirable attempt to cross Inglorious Bastards with American Werewolf in London. The dialogue is witty and enjoyable - the dressing down a military general gives one of the Fearless Four a particular highlight - and it mixes a B movie sensibility with so many different genres like mad scientist movies, werewolf movies, war movies and Nazisploitation that there is rarely a dull moment. Recommended.
  • carriegreer
  • 21 dic 2017
  • Permalink
7/10

Great Throwback to Nazispotation Films

I see people on IMDB comparing this movie to Inglourious Basterds, when it's merely inspired by the same grindhouse films that have inspired Tarantino. This movie is the first real entry in the Nazisplotation genre I've seen in years, and it has soe real B-Movie charm to makes up for its weaknesses.

I especially enjoyed the nods to the Ilsa film series.
  • JungleJeffyGoesToMars
  • 11 set 2020
  • Permalink
1/10

C-Class movie. Dont expect much and not a hidden Gem.

  • richard1321
  • 7 lug 2018
  • Permalink
5/10

Low budget fun.

  • parry_na
  • 28 feb 2018
  • Permalink
1/10

Alternative tagline: "What If Inglorious Basterds Was Terrible?"

So bad it's kind of an insult to anyone who spends their time on it.

"Pound Shop Tom Hardy, meet Hugh Jackman ordered from Wish, we're gonna superglue your left eyes shut because that makes you badass and chuck in some utterly terrible generic 'hard man' nicknames ('Mad Dog', 'The Butcher' and 'Fighting Joe', really?)...SOUND GOOD?!?"

(and that's not even mentioning the utterly inappropriate Shutterstock footage of the actual Auschwitz prison camp shoehorned in for 'historical relevance').

Just...ugh :/
  • iansavagemusic
  • 21 nov 2021
  • Permalink

Altro da questo titolo

Altre pagine da esplorare

Visti di recente

Abilita i cookie del browser per utilizzare questa funzione. Maggiori informazioni.
Scarica l'app IMDb
Accedi per avere maggiore accessoAccedi per avere maggiore accesso
Segui IMDb sui social
Scarica l'app IMDb
Per Android e iOS
Scarica l'app IMDb
  • Aiuto
  • Indice del sito
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • Prendi in licenza i dati di IMDb
  • Sala stampa
  • Pubblicità
  • Lavoro
  • Condizioni d'uso
  • Informativa sulla privacy
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, una società Amazon

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.