Nightwatch: Demons Are Forever
Titolo originale: Nattevagten - Dæmoner går i arv
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,8/10
3756
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Emma, guardiana notturna, indaga sulla scomparsa dei genitori 30 anni prima. L'incontro con il serial killer Wörmer, uscito dal coma, innesca una pericolosa sequenza di eventi.Emma, guardiana notturna, indaga sulla scomparsa dei genitori 30 anni prima. L'incontro con il serial killer Wörmer, uscito dal coma, innesca una pericolosa sequenza di eventi.Emma, guardiana notturna, indaga sulla scomparsa dei genitori 30 anni prima. L'incontro con il serial killer Wörmer, uscito dal coma, innesca una pericolosa sequenza di eventi.
- Premi
- 5 candidature totali
Nina Terese Rask
- Maria
- (as Nina Rask)
Tina Gylling Mortensen
- Henriques
- (as Tina Gylling)
Recensioni in evidenza
It is extremely smart to make a follow up to a danish cult classic almost 30 years later. You manage you capture a new audience, while reintroducing and appealing to the ones who watched it on release back in 1994.
Now this new installment feels and looks like a modernization of the first one and delves into the story years later. It manages to keep the creepyness from the first one, despite lacking the humor and the "out-there-ness" the first movie brought in its delivery and script.
The performances are great all around, but it doesn't do anything new in terms of the genre. To be honest, I personally didn't like the ending, as I felt it lacked a sense place as a lot of the problems the movie explored through its runtime, is resolved with a cliche ending.
It's a good enough movie, even if it doesn't justify its existence because of the sense of conclusion we got in the original.
Now this new installment feels and looks like a modernization of the first one and delves into the story years later. It manages to keep the creepyness from the first one, despite lacking the humor and the "out-there-ness" the first movie brought in its delivery and script.
The performances are great all around, but it doesn't do anything new in terms of the genre. To be honest, I personally didn't like the ending, as I felt it lacked a sense place as a lot of the problems the movie explored through its runtime, is resolved with a cliche ending.
It's a good enough movie, even if it doesn't justify its existence because of the sense of conclusion we got in the original.
A 30 year later sequel is a strange thing, but probably what's even more strange is that it took 30 years at all considering how successful the original was. I didn't even have to check if 'Nightwatch: Demons Are Forever' was made by the same writer/director as the original. I could tell by the chaotic structuring that both films possess. If you enjoyed the original then I'm sure you can at least find some enjoyment in this film.
Again, just like the first, for the first 40-50 minutes of the film I really had no idea where it was headed or what it was even about. Then out of nowhere, just like the first, it straightens the wheel and puts itself on course for a pretty entertaining and well done final hour or so.
Most of the original cast are back, which is a great effort all this time later. Considering the success Nikolaj Coster-Waldau has had in the meantime I'm a little surprised they were able to entice him, particularly considering they made his character a shell of his former self. There is one scene where he interrupts his daughter at the school that really should've been left on the cutting room floor.
In a lot of ways this is going to come across as a strange sequel. But considering how much later it is and that they were able to work the entire original cast into and still make a somewhat creepy and coherent story out of it, I think it is an impressive effort. 7/10.
Again, just like the first, for the first 40-50 minutes of the film I really had no idea where it was headed or what it was even about. Then out of nowhere, just like the first, it straightens the wheel and puts itself on course for a pretty entertaining and well done final hour or so.
Most of the original cast are back, which is a great effort all this time later. Considering the success Nikolaj Coster-Waldau has had in the meantime I'm a little surprised they were able to entice him, particularly considering they made his character a shell of his former self. There is one scene where he interrupts his daughter at the school that really should've been left on the cutting room floor.
In a lot of ways this is going to come across as a strange sequel. But considering how much later it is and that they were able to work the entire original cast into and still make a somewhat creepy and coherent story out of it, I think it is an impressive effort. 7/10.
First of all I have to say that I never saw the original movie, so if you are here to see if this would compare to that movie, then this review might not be the one for you.
But since I write a review to every new horror movie I see, I won't make an exception for this one. I read a plot synopsis of the original one so I had some idea what the past of this movie would be. I found my way around the plot pretty quickly and it didn't take long to see how the characters worked and what type of people they were.
In the intro sequence there's a scene where a young man bashes his head against a unidirectional perspective glass in an interrogation room and the effects looked a little wonky which made me skeptical at first. However since the movie barely uses any CGI, that was the only time that I noticed flaws with the effects. The movie is written by the same writer and there are some characters coming back from the 1994 original which will definitely please some fans.
However the movie is rather slow and with almost two hours of runtime I think it really dragged. This could have been a 90-minute movie and it would be equally as enjoyable if not more. Also the movie introduces a really generic twist which felt unoriginal and lazy. I think if you are a big fan of the original movie you might get something from this sequel, however if you have never seen it like me, this movie doesn't provide much entertainment and therefore doesn't manage to stand on it's own. [5,1/10]
But since I write a review to every new horror movie I see, I won't make an exception for this one. I read a plot synopsis of the original one so I had some idea what the past of this movie would be. I found my way around the plot pretty quickly and it didn't take long to see how the characters worked and what type of people they were.
In the intro sequence there's a scene where a young man bashes his head against a unidirectional perspective glass in an interrogation room and the effects looked a little wonky which made me skeptical at first. However since the movie barely uses any CGI, that was the only time that I noticed flaws with the effects. The movie is written by the same writer and there are some characters coming back from the 1994 original which will definitely please some fans.
However the movie is rather slow and with almost two hours of runtime I think it really dragged. This could have been a 90-minute movie and it would be equally as enjoyable if not more. Also the movie introduces a really generic twist which felt unoriginal and lazy. I think if you are a big fan of the original movie you might get something from this sequel, however if you have never seen it like me, this movie doesn't provide much entertainment and therefore doesn't manage to stand on it's own. [5,1/10]
I saw this directly after seeing it's predecessor.
In this sequel we have Martin's daughter Emma who conveniently takes a job as a night watch in the same forensic department where her parents were traumatized by a psycho.
She finds out that the psycho is alive at a nearby asylum. She becomes obsessed to see him.
At the same time we have a copycat killer on the prowl.
The movie is very predictable but it is atmospheric n an effective thriller.
It takes more than 40 mins before the first kill.
One of the best part is that they have included many new characters, not just so that they can be killed off.
How Brent gets to get out on weekends inspite of him being a brutal killer was beyond me.
In this sequel we have Martin's daughter Emma who conveniently takes a job as a night watch in the same forensic department where her parents were traumatized by a psycho.
She finds out that the psycho is alive at a nearby asylum. She becomes obsessed to see him.
At the same time we have a copycat killer on the prowl.
The movie is very predictable but it is atmospheric n an effective thriller.
It takes more than 40 mins before the first kill.
One of the best part is that they have included many new characters, not just so that they can be killed off.
How Brent gets to get out on weekends inspite of him being a brutal killer was beyond me.
First Nightwatch was released in 1994 and a sequel was announced in 2022. I was surprised to hear that news because usually, it does not take that long for a horror movie sequel to arrive. Well now the year is 2024 and I could finally watch Nightwatch 2. I can tell you the atmosphere is not as eerie and scary as in the first movie. However, this does not mean that this movie is not worth watching but it is worth it. This movie is based on revenge and it is a rematch. I loved the duo of Bodnia and Waldau in the first movie and again we have the duo in the second. I liked the ending of this movie and I advise everyone to watch the first movie before watching this to remember the details. I give 8 over 10! Good job Mr. Bornedal!
Lo sapevi?
- QuizLotte Andersen was offered to reprise the role as Lotte, Godmother of Emma, but declined as she couldn't see herself in the role.
- BlooperIn the scene with the priest in the car, the inside car manufacturer logo at the steering wheel is VW, but when you see the car from the outside, it is a Citroën...
- ConnessioniFollows Il guardiano di notte (1994)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Nightwatch: Demons Are Forever?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Nattvakten - Demons Are Forever
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aarhus Amtssygehus, Aarhus, Danimarca(Hospital, psychiatric hospital, forensic institute)
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 4.300.000 € (previsto)
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 104.266 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 58 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
What is the Canadian French language plot outline for Nightwatch: Demons Are Forever (2023)?
Rispondi