VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,2/10
12.708
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Uno studente universitario che ha visto un UFO sfrutta le sue eccezionali doti matematiche per invesigare l'avvistamento, con al seguito l'FBI.Uno studente universitario che ha visto un UFO sfrutta le sue eccezionali doti matematiche per invesigare l'avvistamento, con al seguito l'FBI.Uno studente universitario che ha visto un UFO sfrutta le sue eccezionali doti matematiche per invesigare l'avvistamento, con al seguito l'FBI.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Benjamin Beatty
- Lee
- (as Ben Beatty)
Cece Abbey
- Young Girl
- (as Cecelia Abbey)
Ted J. Weil
- Airport Detainee
- (as Ted Weil)
A.J. Ransom
- Derek (age 8)
- (as Aiden Ransom)
David Heckel
- Hal LaPierre
- (as Dave Heckle)
Recensioni in evidenza
Enjoyed this slow burn which inspite of being so doesn't bore you for a minute and keeps you engaged. Thoughtful, geeky fun.
Boy, I haven't had chills like this since "Contact".
If you like well written movies, movies that leave you on the edge of your seat from the get-go - this is it!
If you like movies that are INTELLIGENT and push the envelope of interesting and well written, this is your movie!
Acting is superb, writing is superb - and content is mesmerizing.
This movie does what so many big budget films want to do at a fraction of the cost!
Do yourself a favor and watch it. You won't be sorry!
If you like well written movies, movies that leave you on the edge of your seat from the get-go - this is it!
If you like movies that are INTELLIGENT and push the envelope of interesting and well written, this is your movie!
Acting is superb, writing is superb - and content is mesmerizing.
This movie does what so many big budget films want to do at a fraction of the cost!
Do yourself a favor and watch it. You won't be sorry!
This movie ultimately looks and feels like a pretty good student film, it has a pretty interesting story at it's core, and is made on a low budget, it also has some fine acting in it, but at the end of the day, it delivers little i would call cinema worthy. Now i didn't see it in a cinema, but still, a movie is a movie.
This film kind of feels like an episode of a TV show, in it's editing and it's camera work. It's a movie that is made almost entirely on autopilot it seems, it delivers a formula you have seen hundreds of times before, it delivers very few surprises outside the plot itself which could go anywhere to be honest.
And that is what saves this film, that i didn't know exactly where the main story would take me, and this raised the suspense, so i was never bored watching this, at least not much. But Gillian Anderson and David Strathairn has way too little to work with here, it almost feels like they are in this to either cash in on some easy job, or to maybe support an up and coming director, because they are both fine actors, and in this film, you couldn't tell if you had never seen them before.
It's a decent end of the day film, it keeps your attention for the most part, but it wants to be something more, but there just isn't enough money involved to take it to the next level, so it tries to just stay on the ground, tries to keep things small, though ultimately the story itself is HUGE, so it sort of clashes a bit.
So a decent afternoon flick you can watch while having some food or just feeling bored. Not a bad movie, but nothing special either.
6/10 - Fair
This film kind of feels like an episode of a TV show, in it's editing and it's camera work. It's a movie that is made almost entirely on autopilot it seems, it delivers a formula you have seen hundreds of times before, it delivers very few surprises outside the plot itself which could go anywhere to be honest.
And that is what saves this film, that i didn't know exactly where the main story would take me, and this raised the suspense, so i was never bored watching this, at least not much. But Gillian Anderson and David Strathairn has way too little to work with here, it almost feels like they are in this to either cash in on some easy job, or to maybe support an up and coming director, because they are both fine actors, and in this film, you couldn't tell if you had never seen them before.
It's a decent end of the day film, it keeps your attention for the most part, but it wants to be something more, but there just isn't enough money involved to take it to the next level, so it tries to just stay on the ground, tries to keep things small, though ultimately the story itself is HUGE, so it sort of clashes a bit.
So a decent afternoon flick you can watch while having some food or just feeling bored. Not a bad movie, but nothing special either.
6/10 - Fair
Yeah, it's been done before in Close Encounters, sort of, but it's quite a different take. There is a Eureka!! bonding moment between the professor and student about the wavelength of radio signals emitted by hydrogen and it's kind of touching.
It's nice see college students that really seem like college students. Andersen does a very convincing job of a college professor.
One major annoyance is the very last line, when the student is asked what all this means, and he answers "we are not alone." Well, DUH, by this point of the movie. Bad choice there.
It's nice see college students that really seem like college students. Andersen does a very convincing job of a college professor.
One major annoyance is the very last line, when the student is asked what all this means, and he answers "we are not alone." Well, DUH, by this point of the movie. Bad choice there.
This was a very decent film and definitely worth watching - the acting was underplayed and there were no stupid special effects - just a good interesting plot and story.
I have no idea if the math was accurate but it seemed quite plausible and the mystery kept me waiting until the end - I almost felt like a math genius just watching it unfold.
The acting and direction was good - the usual aspergers/autistic type math genius that gets to prove his point by solving a really hard problem - made me think that the future of human kind will probably be in the hands of someone like this.
Not the average action packed sci-fi alien squealing fest but very entertaining.
I have no idea if the math was accurate but it seemed quite plausible and the mystery kept me waiting until the end - I almost felt like a math genius just watching it unfold.
The acting and direction was good - the usual aspergers/autistic type math genius that gets to prove his point by solving a really hard problem - made me think that the future of human kind will probably be in the hands of someone like this.
Not the average action packed sci-fi alien squealing fest but very entertaining.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizLoosely based on events of November 7, 2006, when multiple eyewitnesses at Chicago O'Hare International Airport (including control tower personnel and flight crews) reported an Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) hovering over Gate C17.
- BlooperDuring news reports the news stations call letters all begin with a K. In Cincinnati all stations begin with a W.
- Citazioni
Professor Hendricks: [talking to Derek about UFO signal and conspiracy theory] You don't automatically jump to the most extreme explanations. You analyze the reasonable ones first.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is UFO?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 28min(88 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.39:1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti