King Charles III

Film per la TV
2017
Not Rated
1h 28min

VALUTAZIONE IMDb

LA TUA VALUTAZIONE

Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaPrince Charles' fictional accession to the throne following the Queen's death. When he refuses to sign a controversial bill into law, political chaos ensues: a constitutional crisis, street ... Leggi tuttoPrince Charles' fictional accession to the throne following the Queen's death. When he refuses to sign a controversial bill into law, political chaos ensues: a constitutional crisis, street riots and a tank in front of Buckingham Palace.Prince Charles' fictional accession to the throne following the Queen's death. When he refuses to sign a controversial bill into law, political chaos ensues: a constitutional crisis, street riots and a tank in front of Buckingham Palace.

Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro

VALUTAZIONE IMDb

6,3/10

1898

LA TUA VALUTAZIONE

Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro

Nominato ai 2 BAFTA Award
- 1 vittoria e 5 candidature totali

Foto34

+ 30

Recensioni degli utenti56

6,31.8K

Recensioni in evidenza

BooBoo516

Decent acting in...

A terribly flawed film. As a Shakespearean style tragedy, it's an interesting premise, but as "what if" history it surely falls flat. The writer (Mike Bartlett) needed to do his research (much better than he did). I can't believe this is what the BBC has become. I think they've lost their minds if they think they can keep distributing messes like this one.

8lesleyswc

A stunning Shakespearian take on the post Elizabeth II transfer of the Monarchy in an unsettled England.

While it is shocking to see living people turned into characters that behave in unexpected ways, it is a pure and glorious tragedy that any Greek or Elizabethan playwright would recognize. Betrayal and unmasked ambitions abound. There is even a ghost!

3LyonME

What the hell did I just watch?

Where did this fantasy "reality" drama come from? It takes real living people and turns them into farcical characters with evil or untoward motivations. Yet, like a train wreck, I couldn't look away. I guess it's interesting to watch but I'm not sure why. We all have our opinions on the royal family and what we think makes them tick. It just seems a bit irresponsible to commit those notions to film, which has the unfortunate effect of being interpreted as having a basis in fact.

7mihai_chindris

A new dawn, a new king

As people mourn the death of the queen, Prince Charles prepares to become the king of the monarchy. All things good, we get the idea, but I feel like the movie emphasizes more the characters, than the action itself. Plus, it seems like the situation presented turns into a game with no end, but we already know how things may change. I mean, it's obvious that in a moment when things go wrong, the only solution for the man in power is to give up, right? I just think that the movie could have come up an impartial opinion on how things evolve after the tragic event and let the public decide what path, good or bad, the king may choose.

8mjmorse00

Fascinating

A great idea and a great presentation. The use of "language style" to separate the classes was a wonderful choice. While the underlying reason for the drama is a bit thin (contrived?), the presentation is well worth it.

Altri elementi simili

5,8

Una prova difficile

7,1

Flags of Our Fathers

7,5

Charles II: The Power & the Passion

6,3

5,4

8,4

7,1

6,8

7,5

6,6

7,2

Spanish Flu: The Forgotten Fallen

7,9

National Theatre Live: Twelfth Night

Trama

Modifica

Lo sapevi?

Modifica

Quiz
After performing in the original play in Almeida Theatre, Tim Pigott-Smith and Oliver Chris reprised their roles of King Charles III and Prince William of Wales, respectively, for the small screen.

Blooper
The prop Instrument of Abdication shown has been copy and pasted from that of King Edward VIII. This means the phrase about renouncing the throne also for his descendants has been left in, meaning William could not succeed Charles.