VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,3/10
5701
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Tre prodigi del Kung Fu sono diventati uomini di mezza età sbiaditi, ora a un calcio di distanza dal tirare i muscoli posteriori della coscia. Ma quando il loro maestro viene ucciso, devono ... Leggi tuttoTre prodigi del Kung Fu sono diventati uomini di mezza età sbiaditi, ora a un calcio di distanza dal tirare i muscoli posteriori della coscia. Ma quando il loro maestro viene ucciso, devono vendicare la sua morte.Tre prodigi del Kung Fu sono diventati uomini di mezza età sbiaditi, ora a un calcio di distanza dal tirare i muscoli posteriori della coscia. Ma quando il loro maestro viene ucciso, devono vendicare la sua morte.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 3 vittorie e 3 candidature totali
Recensioni in evidenza
Plenty of solid funny parts and the martials arts stunts were well done. Story was a little bit overblown and the movie was a tad longer than it needed to be. Worth watching if you like martial arts films though.
I'd like to mention my Asian-American heritage as a preface to this because it's the foundation for the enjoyment I got out of watching this movie.
This movie was originally pitched to Hollywood studios who wouldn't allow them a proper budget nor a non-white actor as the lead character (they wanted Bruce Willis and Nicolas Cage, I can't make this up, look it up), and I'm really glad they didn't take the deal.
The cast had great chemistry, the characters were memorable for the most part (would've liked a bit more depth to each of the 3 main characters), and the writing didn't feel pandering, and managed to maintain balance between humor and drama.
But most importantly, I can't tell you how refreshing it is to just watch a movie where Asian-Americans aren't highlighted for being Asian; the two Asian-American characters were written as Asian-American, and not just "Asian". They had Asian-American flaws, jokes, interests, even language.
The premise of this movie makes it easy to dismiss this as "just another Asian martial arts movie", but I promise it's got much more to it than that. This is definitely a movie I'd recommend to anyone.
This movie was originally pitched to Hollywood studios who wouldn't allow them a proper budget nor a non-white actor as the lead character (they wanted Bruce Willis and Nicolas Cage, I can't make this up, look it up), and I'm really glad they didn't take the deal.
The cast had great chemistry, the characters were memorable for the most part (would've liked a bit more depth to each of the 3 main characters), and the writing didn't feel pandering, and managed to maintain balance between humor and drama.
But most importantly, I can't tell you how refreshing it is to just watch a movie where Asian-Americans aren't highlighted for being Asian; the two Asian-American characters were written as Asian-American, and not just "Asian". They had Asian-American flaws, jokes, interests, even language.
The premise of this movie makes it easy to dismiss this as "just another Asian martial arts movie", but I promise it's got much more to it than that. This is definitely a movie I'd recommend to anyone.
Paper Tiger is neither a great movie nor a bad movie..it lied somewhere in the average line to me.
The opening sequence and all did look promising but it was slow paced and sometimes engaging otherwise disengaging
It has a decent enough plot with some humor lingering all over which most of the time worked
The acting is decent and I am really glad that the director declined the inclusion of Bruce willis as a white male lead and to include Nicholas Cage as requested by hwood studios and went on to start a fundraiser and made an independent movie instead with an asian american as lead and with another Asian-American and a man of color as supporting leads
The action scenes were okay and the slow motion too was bearable
I can't say it's a proper entertainer for me becoz of the reasons I mentioned above but it's definitely a good movie in my eyes.... I will definitely re-watch it in the future and see if I can enjoy it a little bit more.
The opening sequence and all did look promising but it was slow paced and sometimes engaging otherwise disengaging
It has a decent enough plot with some humor lingering all over which most of the time worked
The acting is decent and I am really glad that the director declined the inclusion of Bruce willis as a white male lead and to include Nicholas Cage as requested by hwood studios and went on to start a fundraiser and made an independent movie instead with an asian american as lead and with another Asian-American and a man of color as supporting leads
The action scenes were okay and the slow motion too was bearable
I can't say it's a proper entertainer for me becoz of the reasons I mentioned above but it's definitely a good movie in my eyes.... I will definitely re-watch it in the future and see if I can enjoy it a little bit more.
This movie was a good watch. It wasn't anything crazy but it gave me a taste of what I was looking for, and then some. There was some great fighting scenes, jokes and comedy scenes that made me laugh, and the story, although a tad bit exaggerated, had me interested from beginning to end. The actors were likeable, and their flashbacks linking them to their younger selves looked good and helped me understand them a little more. I'd probably watch this movie again.
The fighting was good, acting was good and comedy was actually funny. How is this movie boring? Don't listen to the bad reviews. If you like comedy and martial arts and not rated R stuff, this movie is for you.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizWhen pitching the story to Hollywood studios, Hollywood wanted a white lead character to be played by Bruce Willis for $4 million dollars. They also wanted a role written for Nicolas Cage. The director and producers declined the offer and request because the script is originally about an Asian-American main character with a leading cast who are people of color. The team did not want to whitewash film, so they ended up going to Kickstarter to raise over $124,000 and had a few other investors to fund their independent film instead. (Source: The Daily Beast Op-Ed by Bao Tran; Seattle Channel Bao Tran interview)
- BlooperOne of home movies in the opening scenes is dated February 29, 1991. Indicating a leap year. But 1991 wasn't a leap year.
- ConnessioniReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 814: Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings (2021)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is The Paper Tigers?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Los Tigres de Papel
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Canton Alley S, Seattle, Washington, Stati Uniti(Alley behind restaurant)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 112.691 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 46.615 USD
- 9 mag 2021
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 118.351 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 48min(108 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti