[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario delle usciteI migliori 250 filmI film più popolariEsplora film per genereCampione d’incassiOrari e bigliettiNotizie sui filmFilm indiani in evidenza
    Cosa c’è in TV e in streamingLe migliori 250 serieLe serie più popolariEsplora serie per genereNotizie TV
    Cosa guardareTrailer più recentiOriginali IMDbPreferiti IMDbIn evidenza su IMDbGuida all'intrattenimento per la famigliaPodcast IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralTutti gli eventi
    Nato oggiCelebrità più popolariNotizie sulle celebrità
    Centro assistenzaZona contributoriSondaggi
Per i professionisti del settore
  • Lingua
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista Video
Accedi
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usa l'app
Guida agli episodi
  • Il Cast e la Troupe
  • Recensioni degli utenti
  • Quiz
  • Domande frequenti
IMDbPro

White Rabbit Project

  • Serie TV
  • 2016
  • TV-PG
  • 48min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,9/10
1801
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Grant Imahara, Tory Belleci, and Kari Byron in White Rabbit Project (2016)
White Rabbit Project
Riproduci trailer1:33
1 video
13 foto
Reality TV

Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaScientists investigate unusual events from pop culture, science and history.Scientists investigate unusual events from pop culture, science and history.Scientists investigate unusual events from pop culture, science and history.

  • Star
    • Tory Belleci
    • Kari Byron
    • Grant Imahara
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • VALUTAZIONE IMDb
    6,9/10
    1801
    LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
    • Star
      • Tory Belleci
      • Kari Byron
      • Grant Imahara
    • 25Recensioni degli utenti
    • 2Recensioni della critica
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • Episodi10

    Sfoglia gli episodi
    InizioI più votati1 stagione2016

    Video1

    White Rabbit Project
    Trailer 1:33
    White Rabbit Project

    Foto13

    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    + 9
    Visualizza poster

    Interpreti principali83

    Modifica
    Tory Belleci
    Tory Belleci
    • Self - Host
    • 2016
    Kari Byron
    Kari Byron
    • Self - Host
    • 2016
    Grant Imahara
    Grant Imahara
    • Self - Host
    • 2016
    Benjamin Cavanagh
    • Liam…
    • 2016
    Lucy Beresford
    • Self - Psychologist
    • 2016
    Brian J. Ford
    • Self - Biologist & Author
    • 2016
    Leslie Kendall
    • Self - Curator: Petersen Automotive Museum
    • 2016
    Peter Spindler
    • Self - Commander: Scotland Yard (ret'd)
    • 2016
    Greg Gage
    Greg Gage
    • Self - Neuroscientist
    • 2016
    David Mayman
    • Self - CEO: Jetpack Aviation
    • 2016
    Tim George
    • Self - Auto Historian
    • 2016
    Kris Dorr
    • Self - Vinyl Record Specialist
    • 2016
    Bob Romaneschi
    • Self - Hot Air Balloon Engineer
    • 2016
    Reverend Gadget
    • Self - Electric Custom Car Builder
    • 2016
    Aron Koscho
    • Self - CEO: Applied Tesla Technology
    • 2016
    Alki David
    • Self - Founder & CEO: Hologram USA
    • 2016
    Günter Wetzel
    • Self
    • 2016
    Aaron Blaisdell
    • Self - Animal Psychologist
    • 2016
    • Tutti gli interpreti e le troupe
    • Produzione, botteghino e altro su IMDbPro

    Recensioni degli utenti25

    6,91.8K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Recensioni in evidenza

    7justin-74-890942

    I'm probably in the minority, but I'd like more SCIENCE and less SILLY.

    I'm a huge fan of these guys and have been since they first appeared in Mythbusters. I enjoyed the last season of that show, but felt like losing these three was a big loss.

    Therefore I'm super happy Netflix threw some bucks at them and got them their own gig, and it's a great time revisiting a gang who feel like old friends now - already this show gets a big pass from me.

    My issue here really is with the presentation. Each subject they cover is LADEN with silly over-the-top sketch performances by the gang that easily eat up 60-70% of the screen time, with only 30% left over for the actual meat of the science. I realize that I'm in the minority of the public who find the tech stuff fascinating and the fluff, well, fluffy, but I could really do with a lot less "estrogen crazed Hitler dancing through the tulips" (in an especially egregious example of this from the "world war 2 crazy weapons" episode) and more fun experiments-gone-wrong. If they had cut out, for example, all of the "Farting Germans at a Cafe" and "Hitler gets boobs" feature-ettes from that episode they could have packed in at least a few more crazy weapon schemes which I would have found WAY more interesting.

    To summarize, I watch a TON of hilarious sketch comedy shows already, when I want science I want to turn to these guys. Dial back the "acting" just a bit and you've got a winner.
    5Cookington12

    Feels like a high budget top-10 list

    I'm really disappointed White Rabbit Project ended up as meh as it was. I've always enjoyed the trio's segments on Mythbusters and while it was sad to see them leave the show, I was excited to see what they could accomplish with their freedom on Netflix. Instead, the show feels like a very high budget YouTube top ten list with occasional experiments here and there.

    Each episode focuses on a general theme, such as superhero powers. Each of the three have two entries out of 6, generally with one being an experiment and the other being some small research and storytelling. At the end of every episode, the 6 entries are (supposedly?) averaged out and ranked on three criteria, like "how similar is it to the actual superpower." The problem I have with White Rabbit Project is that it doesn't play to the strengths that the trio had back in Mythbusters. Everybody works separately here, maybe showing up to an experiment as a test subject every once in a while, which is a far cry from their work in Mythbusters.

    I would only recommend watching this if you have nothing else to watch and you liked the trio's work back in Mythbusters. There's definitely some good episodes in here, don't get me wrong, but even despite those good episodes, the majority of this show is forgettable.
    9coaster1921

    Not Mythbusters, but it's still good!

    First off this isn't Mythbusters. The format is very different, but this isn't a bad thing.

    Each episode centers around a theme, where the team compares and ranks 6 loosely related ideas (e.g. speed, heists, scams, etc.) Usually, for each idea there is storytelling interspersed with builds of contraptions used in the story. It's surprisingly entertaining, however, and the team is far more entertaining than they ever were on Mythbusters, where Adam and Jamie usually worked on the main myth of the episode and the stories of the myths weren't at the forefront.

    Sometimes the stories are a little rushed in order to fit all 6 ideas in, and I wish they would spend more time on the builds, however, but that doesn't ruin it for me. In Mythbusters, I didn't particularly enjoy the sections the team did, but here they're so much more interesting to listen to. This show is nice and really surprised me, as I expected it to be very different than it is. Definitely worth a watch!
    7sullybolly

    Make it more about the science and/or shorten the run time.

    To start off, there's great potential in this series, I hope it keeps going and growing , and that the show runners listen in on what people want to see improved. Of course, it's also great to see the gang back together in this new "Mythbusters 2.0", although it's less myths, and more comparison of the best stories that fit the theme of the episode.

    The story telling and comparison concept is also one of the major problems that I have with the show. Instead of the way it is now where the majority of the program is story telling and skits, and the minority is science and experimentation, I would like to see this be the other way around. It's the talents and creativity of the trio that I'm most interested in seeing be put to good use like when Grant built his octocopter, even if it means cutting it down to 1 story per person, and/or shortening episode length.

    Maybe it's because of the concept of the show, but every episode seems to drag on for too long. If the show were to remain the same, I think it would greatly benefit from a 30-35 minute run time per episode, instead of the current 45 minute one. Remember, it's about quality, not quantity.

    Again, I do hope that Netflix reads what I and others have said, and implements these suggestions in one way or another, because they could take the show from being just alright, to being great.

    A benefit of the doubt, 7/10.
    7TedStixonAKAMaximumMadness

    "White Rabbit Project"- An uneven but entertaining spiritual successor to the incredibly popular "Mythbusters." Good fun, but rough around the edges at times.

    One of the most beloved and wickedly entertaining pieces of pop- culture in recent memory, "Mythbusters" was a small phenomena. Mixing real science with laugh-out-loud humor and an excellent cast of real-life characters, the series thrilled audiences for well over ten years and even after cancellation, it remains a fan-favorite for many a television viewer. So it should come as no surprise that a sort-of spiritual successor or follow-up would happen. And we get that in "White Rabbit Project", an entertaining but sometimes uneven new Netflix series starring the "Mythbusters" build-team of Kari Byron, Tory Belleci and Grant Imahara. While it has a small slew of issues holding it back from sheer perfection, I do think that the show is off to a promising start, has a lot of room to grow, and should it be renewed for a second season, it has the potential to get better and better.

    Each episode follows our hosts as they explore and discuss a topic, whether it be comic-book superpowers, long-fabled future-tech or even just real-life scam artists. We explore different aspects and examples of each topic and how they could be recreated in the real world or be accomplished. Along the way, we are treated to friendly banter, the occasional skit and plenty of likable chemistry with our three leads.

    I'll definitely admit that perhaps the biggest part of the appeal here is the fact that we've finally rejoined the build-team after their absence in the final episodes of "Mythbusters", and the leftover love for that series that fans have. And it's part of what makes the series all the more palatable even when it falters at time. Byron, Bellaci and Imahara are endlessly likable and entertaining and have an absolutely wonderful sense of companionship on screen. The topics discussed are very fascinating and it's a lot of fun seeing them doing oddball things like turning roaches into technical cyborgs or discussing the topic of heists.

    But that being said, I can't help but feel that the series is way too unfocused and uneven at times. To the point that some episodes just don't work. The show has a very frenetic pace and it never really stops to let you appreciate the science of what's happening. Therefore it can be hard to really get a handle or invest yourself. I also think there's a bit too much "qwirkiness" and "style" going on for the show's own good. Yes, it's fun seeing an occasional skit or seeing Grant dress up in a supervillain's outfit. But we don't need a five-minute scene to introduce an episode or a prolonged scripted scene of acting to introduce a segment. It's just got too much filler. I'd rather see more deliberate and streamlined episodes with a greater focus on and more breathing room for the actual experimentation.

    But that being said... it's still a very decent show. Even if abbreviated, the science is fascinating. The topics are often very fun and quite varied. Our hosts are just a blast and a half and are consistently enjoyable to watch. And there's a lot of untapped potential beneath the surface that keeps you invested and hoping for more. So hopefully it'll do well enough to get more episodes ordered. I know I'd love to see more, and I think newer installments will get progressively better. It might not quite live up to the sheer perfection that was "Mythbusters"... but it's a worthy unofficial follow-up.

    "White Rabbit Project" is a solid 7 out of 10 for me.

    Altri elementi simili

    America's Next Top Model
    5,7
    America's Next Top Model
    MythBusters
    8,3
    MythBusters
    Julieta
    7,1
    Julieta
    Motor MythBusters
    6,4
    Motor MythBusters
    Assassin's Creed
    5,6
    Assassin's Creed
    I grandi sognatori
    5,6
    I grandi sognatori
    Mythbusters Jr.
    7,1
    Mythbusters Jr.
    L'uomo nell'alto castello
    7,9
    L'uomo nell'alto castello
    MythBusters: The Search
    4,1
    MythBusters: The Search
    Creature Features
    8,4
    Creature Features
    Savage Builds
    8,0
    Savage Builds
    Crash Test World
    7,8
    Crash Test World

    Trama

    Modifica

    Lo sapevi?

    Modifica
    • Quiz
      The three hosts started this project after their release from mythbusters over a salary dispute.
    • Connessioni
      Referenced in AniMat's Crazy Cartoon Cast: Howard & Grant (2020)
    • Colonne sonore
      Theme Composition
      by Ned Beckley

      Published by Gaga Music Pty Ltd

    I più visti

    Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
    Accedi

    Domande frequenti15

    • How many seasons does White Rabbit Project have?Powered by Alexa

    Dettagli

    Modifica
    • Data di uscita
      • 9 dicembre 2016 (Stati Uniti)
    • Paese di origine
      • Stati Uniti
    • Siti ufficiali
      • Official site
      • Official Twitter
    • Lingua
      • Inglese
    • Celebre anche come
      • Проект Белый кролик
    • Azienda produttrice
      • Beyond Productions
    • Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro

    Specifiche tecniche

    Modifica
    • Tempo di esecuzione
      • 48min
    • Colore
      • Color

    Contribuisci a questa pagina

    Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
    • Ottieni maggiori informazioni sulla partecipazione
    Modifica paginaAggiungi episodio

    Altre pagine da esplorare

    Visti di recente

    Abilita i cookie del browser per utilizzare questa funzione. Maggiori informazioni.
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Accedi per avere maggiore accessoAccedi per avere maggiore accesso
    Segui IMDb sui social
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Per Android e iOS
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    • Aiuto
    • Indice del sito
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Prendi in licenza i dati di IMDb
    • Sala stampa
    • Pubblicità
    • Lavoro
    • Condizioni d'uso
    • Informativa sulla privacy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una società Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.