Zoe

Though this flick is marked as "science fiction" it is quite light in that category. It is about as "science fiction" as "Her" is, which is to say they're using the science fiction possible future to help bend the rules of reality to try to sell the story, with mixed

I went in with no prior knowledge of the film. Even after actively wanting to go in blank, the points were quite predictable. There were possibly a few red herrings but its hard to tell if these are intentional or accidental.

Visually, this film can be quite stunning. There is a mix of the mundane normality of life with moments of near-future sprinkled throughout but enough recognizable to keep things grounded. It feels realistically 'within our lifetimes'.

The score in this film is ok, a bit airy but it does its job. The problem with the score is when it is essentially blasted out at times. This can be a bit jarring the times when its unwarranted. However, the times it peaks at the right times, alongside the visuals or story reasons, can be very powerful indeed. The sound balancing seems to be all over the place, with one scene in a 'bumping' nightclub where two characters have to shout-talk followed by a scene of whispering. The score doesnt exactly help as often it is cranked up way too high to try to give it an appearance of kind of floating dreamlike quality. It often feels like they have the wrong slider bars up and down where they need to be reversed.

The story is... fine? Its kind of like 'Her' mixed with a drop of 'Ex Machina' with less existential dread for the humans and more for the androids. It feels like the story of 'Her' where the focus was on the AI vs the human character. The story honestly doesnt have very much to say.

Its plot crawls along at a snails pace for most of the movie, so if you're expecting action or dramatic dialogue, you'll be in for a bad time. What plot there is slowly unfolds along with the love and loss that the main characters deal with. There are a few sprinkles of side plot but these threads are left mostly dangling, with perhaps a line or two of dialogue attempting to close the plot holes but doing so very poorly. The rare side plots there are seem kind of abandoned around the mid point of the movie. In a way this feels like two scripts forced into the same movie with one taking place in the first half of the movie and the other script kicking in for most of the second.

Zoe feel like a bit of a mix between a date movie and definitely NOT a date movie, depending on how cerebral you/your date is. In the end, it lands on 'date movie' with how things turned out, quite happy to end sappy.

I was about to suggest that they could have made a better movie if they trimmed this down only to see that its 103 minutes. It felt like over 2 hours to me honestly! I'm shocked its so short yet feels so long. Maybe as a 15m short film it would have been better?

Zoe isnt horrible, far from it. However, aside from the moral question of "is it ok for a dude and a robochick to love", theres not much more there. Despite how lovely Zoe can, that in and of itself is not enough to elevate the movie beyond a passable 6/10.

A personal opinion is the same I have for a lot of AI movies. They create ultra-smart AI that is capable of acting and moving like a human and is all but indistinguishable from other humans but come with the benefits of being able synthetic, which means they dont eat or sleep, should have better reflexes and vision than any human, and should have the ability well beyond that of any human, yet they're relegated to companionship appliances as opposed to real-world uses they would do. If there were synthetic humanoid androids that were advanced enough to fool most people, they would quickly replace almost all jobs, leaving humanity left to their own devices.

Beautifull, captivating and a true love story dealing with the human condition and what it is to be alive, lonely and love.

There is a fundamental incompatibility.

"Zoe" is not just a film about artificial intelligence and the influence it will have on our society. It also shows how artificially our society will be in the future. A world where feelings are reduced to figures and where pharmaceutical concoctions provide a short but intense expression of love. Both with disastrous results. Couples who are madly in love, without any major relationship problems, grow apart very quickly after hearing the final score of "The Machine". A percentage that indicates how much chance there is that their relationship will succeed. Couples who are about to split up can take advantage of Benysol to experience those feelings of falling in love again. Which in turn leads to the trade of this product in an illegal circuit, as these feelings have an addictive effect. The film "Zoe" was fascinating, intriguing and touching at the same time. A film that kept me busy the days after I saw it. I don't have that often.

"Zoe" is a mixture of "Her" and "Ex Machina". "Her" was also about the love between a person and a non-human entity. Here it was a computer program that communicated sensually and seductively using the voice of Scarlett Johansson. Just because of the sexy voice I would fall in love with this artificially intelligent creature consisting of program lines. In addition to the development of a relationship test program and pharmaceutical love potions, Cole Ainsley (Ewan "Lo Imposible" McGregor), an engineer and expert in the field of A.I. who works at "Relationist", managed to construct lifelike androids. Artificially intelligent beings that function autonomously. Just like Ava in "Ex Machina". Only less futuristic and equipped with all elements such that there is no distinction between them and a human being. Cole himself is divorced and stares every night at his computer screen in search of a possible matching partner. I wonder if his loneliness and lack of female companionship cause his imagination to go in a certain direction, which then manifested itself in the design of these "synthetics". Because his creations are equipped with a voluptuous bosom. Just like Zoe (Léa Seydoux).

The film is pretty slow. There are many moments with a distant and preoccupied Zoe or Cole. Zoe tries to fathom her raison d'être and experiences a personality crisis, asking herself who she really is. Cole is caught in his emotions when it's about Zoe. He's intuitively attracted to her but his sense of reality about the person Zoe bothers him. Perhaps because of that, you feel there's a certain kind of distance between these two individuals. An insurmountable obstacle with disastrous consequences for both. The result is a flee in self-pity for the one. And even doubting the meaning of existence for the other. But not only the romantic problems are central here. Also, the interaction of "Synthetics" with their immediate environment and other similar designs is being covered. And the associated well-known phenomenon of a piece of electronics developing a feeling of life and a consciousness is highlighted as well.

I thought the two protagonists played a sublime role as opposites. Perhaps some will say there that there was absolutely no chemistry between them. But wasn't that the point? It shows how love sometimes has to overcome difficult obstacles. And how ultimate love will circumvent all obstacles. In that respect, their acting was perfect. But especially Léa Seydoux fascinates. The way her mood changes, is wonderful to see. One moment she looks like a teenager whose young life is filled with puppy love and therefore she flutters through the scenes. The next moment she's hurt and looks like a hopelessly lost young woman, full of doubts who plunges into a chaotic love life. It was a pleasant surprise to see Theo James appear in this indie-SF. And to be honest, I found his character more interesting than the one he played in the "Divergent" story. And last but not least, you can also admire Christina Aguilera as a lifelike inflatable doll that entertains lonely fetishists.

Well, I really liked "Zoe". It's a beautiful film and a bit of a relief after a number of less successful films. But I'm guessing you figured that out already, after reading this long lyrical review. Even though I feared it would be a boring average movie at the beginning. The different story layers fascinated me and kept me riveted to my screen. It's an extraordinary film pointing out that future relationships with artificial beings will be more complex than the human relationships as we experience them today. Sure enough, I could predict in advance how it would end and what a final picture we would get with Zoe in close-up. But, for once, that didn't really bother me.

I kind of get that many here likes this, but on the other hand I don't. I didn't feel the romance between McGregor and Seydoux at all (in other Doremus' movies it has been the opposite). Also the scifi / AI aspect didn't offer anything we haven't seen in the past years and many of those other movies have done it with deeper results. Of course everyone has their own opinion, but I can't say with straight face that this one could compete with Ex Machina, Her, Westworld, Upgrade etc. on quality. Then there are the songs, ok couple of them hits the spot, but mr. Doremus has the habit to put waaaay too many on his films, and often they can even ruin the mood. Editing also hurt the eyes few times. All in all I think it's very average, I would rather watch Doremus' Equals, that made me feel at least something.

'Her' meets 'Blade Runner' in this overly-derivative tale of an inventor of AI 'synethetics' who falls in love with his own creation. The story touches on how we willingly humanise technology for our own human desires, and how tolerance and acceptance might be extended to non-human life forms - and how they, in their evolving emotional intelligence, might tolerate, accept and pity us. But is it love? These are all interesting questions, but ultimately remain under-developed in this movie which fails to fully mine the heady themes it sets up. The narrative seems too obsessed with tribute nods to Blade Runner - mechanical voiced surveys, synthetics as sex toys, memory implants - and less interested in pushing its characters and questions to extremes in order to surprise and disturb. As a result, it fails the plausibility test that such futuristic stories undergo. It isn't convincing. At no point did I think, 'Yes, this is what we could become.' And that is where the film differs from Her and Blade Runner. This is a familiar story of boy meets girl, gets girl, loses girl, tries to win her back. The sentimental music is overly-manipulative. It's a teary love story, with light sci-fi decorations in the frame. Beautifully shot, and has decent acting performances, but ultimately bland and disappointing.