Dieci anni dopo la loro folle estate come supervisori del campo, la banda si riunisce per un weekend pieno di amicizia, colpi di scena e avventure agghiaccianti.Dieci anni dopo la loro folle estate come supervisori del campo, la banda si riunisce per un weekend pieno di amicizia, colpi di scena e avventure agghiaccianti.Dieci anni dopo la loro folle estate come supervisori del campo, la banda si riunisce per un weekend pieno di amicizia, colpi di scena e avventure agghiaccianti.
- Premi
- 1 candidatura in totale
Sfoglia gli episodi
Recensioni in evidenza
Although not a masterpiece, the original movie from 2001 is a charming and entertaining one. It was funny. The sequels have been disappointing, with every installment progressively worse.
Everything about Wet Hot American Summer: Ten Years Later screams "first draft". It's like they were spit balling in the writer's room saying "wouldn't it be funny if" and it never progressed beyond that step. I have witnessed that firsthand on comedy projects I have worked on where the writers are howling with laughter and slapping each other on the back, just to have everything fall flat when you shoot it and hand it over to the poor editor who is the one who has got to try and save it.
Perhaps one problem is that the core croup come out of sketch comedy via The State. There is no narrative flow to Wet Hot American Summer: Ten Years Later. It's easier to mask that in a 90 minute movie, like the original, but when you stretch it for 8 episodes (or rather 16 episodes, since both Netflix shows have the same structure) it becomes quite tedious.
One show also made by people from The State that manage to pull this off beautifully is Reno 9/11 (one of my favorite shows). But the structure of that show (essentially a COPS parody) lends itself perfectly to the sketch format, it doesn't have the need for the same narrative flow that Wet Hot American Summer: Ten Years Later aspires to.
But the cardinal sin with Wet Hot American Summer: Ten Years Later is that it unlike the original movie, isn't very funny. Most ideas are half baked, and the actors are going through the motions. It didn't help that every time someone shouted "Walla-walla-hoo!" I wanted to kick their teeth in.
Perhaps the original movie was lightning in a bottle.
Everything about Wet Hot American Summer: Ten Years Later screams "first draft". It's like they were spit balling in the writer's room saying "wouldn't it be funny if" and it never progressed beyond that step. I have witnessed that firsthand on comedy projects I have worked on where the writers are howling with laughter and slapping each other on the back, just to have everything fall flat when you shoot it and hand it over to the poor editor who is the one who has got to try and save it.
Perhaps one problem is that the core croup come out of sketch comedy via The State. There is no narrative flow to Wet Hot American Summer: Ten Years Later. It's easier to mask that in a 90 minute movie, like the original, but when you stretch it for 8 episodes (or rather 16 episodes, since both Netflix shows have the same structure) it becomes quite tedious.
One show also made by people from The State that manage to pull this off beautifully is Reno 9/11 (one of my favorite shows). But the structure of that show (essentially a COPS parody) lends itself perfectly to the sketch format, it doesn't have the need for the same narrative flow that Wet Hot American Summer: Ten Years Later aspires to.
But the cardinal sin with Wet Hot American Summer: Ten Years Later is that it unlike the original movie, isn't very funny. Most ideas are half baked, and the actors are going through the motions. It didn't help that every time someone shouted "Walla-walla-hoo!" I wanted to kick their teeth in.
Perhaps the original movie was lightning in a bottle.
I feel this was truly written for fans of the film, whereas First Day of Camp was written for kids who didn't really understand the film.
Best of all, pretty much every character from the movie is back. If you love the film, this is worth a go.
Best of all, pretty much every character from the movie is back. If you love the film, this is worth a go.
Loads of laughs, doesn't take itself too seriously. A lot of the same cast with more lumps and bumps and wrinkles.
Still a 9/10 don't mind the critics.
Still a 9/10 don't mind the critics.
Wow. Despite the great reviews, I found "First Day At Camp" to be beyond boring. In addition to being so distracting that everyone was clearly 20 years older, there was just nothing there.
I love that this movie said screw it and after starting with the cutesy satire of "where are they now" schtick early on, it is unashamed to just go off the rails. Disparate story lines that somehow connect together, ridiculous "cameos" and story lines, and just good fun all around.
One of the more pleasant surprises that I have had watching a TV show in a long time
I love that this movie said screw it and after starting with the cutesy satire of "where are they now" schtick early on, it is unashamed to just go off the rails. Disparate story lines that somehow connect together, ridiculous "cameos" and story lines, and just good fun all around.
One of the more pleasant surprises that I have had watching a TV show in a long time
As the summer ends, the gang at Camp Firewood agrees to meet again ten years later. It is 1991 and some of them have returned. Little do they know, President Reagan has other ideas with their camp.
I like the original well enough, but I love First Day of Camp more. Part of it is that I wasn't prepared with the original. Also, First Day is just stupider and sillier especially with the time bending premise. The ten years jump takes away the big gimmick from First Day. It's crazy to push that gimmick any further, but it would have been glorious to try.
This one exists somewhere in the middle. I am glad that many have returned from both the original and First Day. One gets the sense that this is a fun time with old friends for all those involved and it shows.
I like the original well enough, but I love First Day of Camp more. Part of it is that I wasn't prepared with the original. Also, First Day is just stupider and sillier especially with the time bending premise. The ten years jump takes away the big gimmick from First Day. It's crazy to push that gimmick any further, but it would have been glorious to try.
This one exists somewhere in the middle. I am glad that many have returned from both the original and First Day. One gets the sense that this is a fun time with old friends for all those involved and it shows.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizBecause of scheduling conflicts, David Hyde Pierce (Professor Henry Neumann) was only able to appear in one scene of one episode of this installment, and in that scene, Neumann is only shown on a screen. Neumann is ostensibly calling from his office at N.A.S.A.'s Cape Canaveral, Florida, but in the background of the office, there is a bookcase holding multiple Emmys. In an August 2017 interview with Vulture.com, David Wain explained, "David Hyde Pierce was directing a play in New York during the whole shoot, so there was just literally no chance he could come. He had no time, so we thought, as we'd done in other ways in the past, let's lean into that even more. So, we decided to literally shoot it on Skype in his apartment and make it clear that we're doing that." The Emmys on the bookcase are Pierce's own from his years on Frasier (1993).
- ConnessioniFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Must See Trailers of June 2017 (2017)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 27min
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti