1920 London
- 2016
- 2h
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
4,2/10
2092
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaAfter her husband is possessed by an evil spirit, a woman turns to her former lover to perform an exorcism.After her husband is possessed by an evil spirit, a woman turns to her former lover to perform an exorcism.After her husband is possessed by an evil spirit, a woman turns to her former lover to perform an exorcism.
Surendra Pal
- Shivangi's Father
- (as Surender Pal)
Charu Rohatgi
- Shivangi's Mother
- (as Charu Rohatagi)
Sushmita Mukherjee
- Kesar Maa
- (as Sushmita Mukharji)
Siraj Mustafa Khan
- Rana Jag Pratap Singh
- (as Siraj Mustufa)
Dinesh Mehta
- Rudra Pratap
- (as Dinesh Mahta)
Kamal Adib
- Pratap Singh
- (as Kamal Adip)
Recensione in evidenza
I was geared up to watch this one too. The poster at the movie theater made it look like a great horror movie and I could not wait to check it out. So maybe my hopes were too high going into it.
Basically a woman's husband gets possessed by a ghost and the only one who can save him is a her ex-lover who's love she betrayed and it got him sent to prison were he learned the dark arts.
The movie drags on for far too long, but then half way through the movie there is a really cool plot twist that made the movie so worth seeing. The only problem is, the movie does not end there and keeps going messing up the perfect ending.
My only guess is that Bollywood needs a certain type of ending like Hollywood does and is willing to screw up what could have been a decent picture in order to get it.
The lousy special effects and the god awful acting coming from the main actress could have been forgiven, if they would have ended with the great plot twist.
And I here that this is one in a series of films, and that the others are better and scarier, but 1920 London makes me not want to sit through any to give it a try.
Basically a woman's husband gets possessed by a ghost and the only one who can save him is a her ex-lover who's love she betrayed and it got him sent to prison were he learned the dark arts.
The movie drags on for far too long, but then half way through the movie there is a really cool plot twist that made the movie so worth seeing. The only problem is, the movie does not end there and keeps going messing up the perfect ending.
My only guess is that Bollywood needs a certain type of ending like Hollywood does and is willing to screw up what could have been a decent picture in order to get it.
The lousy special effects and the god awful acting coming from the main actress could have been forgiven, if they would have ended with the great plot twist.
And I here that this is one in a series of films, and that the others are better and scarier, but 1920 London makes me not want to sit through any to give it a try.
- subxerogravity
- 8 mag 2016
- Permalink
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizSharman Joshi's 2nd Horror Film. First being Gang of Ghosts
- ConnessioniFollows 1920 (2008)
- Colonne sonoreGumnaam Hai Koi
Written by: Kunal Verma
Produced by: Shaarib Sabri and Toshi Sabri
Performed by: Jubin Nautiyal and Antara Mitra
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is 1920 London?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- 1920: Khai Trừ Quỷ Dữ
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Mahabat Maqbara, Junagadh, Gujarat, India(Rootha Kyun Song)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 16.077 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione2 ore
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was 1920 London (2016) officially released in Canada in English?
Rispondi