Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaFormer special ops soldier, Laura Bishop, shows up for work at the largest church in America and is forced to take down a team of hijackers when she learns her daughter is trapped inside.Former special ops soldier, Laura Bishop, shows up for work at the largest church in America and is forced to take down a team of hijackers when she learns her daughter is trapped inside.Former special ops soldier, Laura Bishop, shows up for work at the largest church in America and is forced to take down a team of hijackers when she learns her daughter is trapped inside.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Rance Randall
- Herbert
- (as Michael Randall)
Recensioni in evidenza
The overall scheme of the movie ( That I perceived ) was that apparently there were some jug heads with a vendetta who sought vengeance against the thieving pastor who basically took all and gave nothing back. The overall morality of the movie was acceptable, but it seemed forced, overwhelming, and misplaced. In the movie, the church had prison-like features ( For almost no reason ), a "high security" (which consisted of two people ), and an irregular plot. It wasn't long before I noticed the very poor directing and acting, let alone, some of the worst editing I've seen in a movie that considers itself< at the least, a "B" movie.
As far as editing, there are many scenes where the blood doesn't match up with the previous scene. These cuts are one of the most important things to viewers.
The plot was shaky. I half way understood where it was going, but in the end, the director just gave up and wanted to finish quickly.
The conclusion was a ( for the most part ) a happy ending, excluding personal deaths within the movie, but, very inconclusive and had not left an opening for a sequel, or at the very least an answer on how things happened. Also, five minutes, is five minutes. If you're going to place a specific time in a movie ( ex. 5 min ), and be so elaborate as of how much that time means, then execute that time in a timely fashion.
Overall, I rate this movie a 3/10. Spend your time watching something better.
As far as editing, there are many scenes where the blood doesn't match up with the previous scene. These cuts are one of the most important things to viewers.
The plot was shaky. I half way understood where it was going, but in the end, the director just gave up and wanted to finish quickly.
The conclusion was a ( for the most part ) a happy ending, excluding personal deaths within the movie, but, very inconclusive and had not left an opening for a sequel, or at the very least an answer on how things happened. Also, five minutes, is five minutes. If you're going to place a specific time in a movie ( ex. 5 min ), and be so elaborate as of how much that time means, then execute that time in a timely fashion.
Overall, I rate this movie a 3/10. Spend your time watching something better.
Wes miller, it sounds like a speedy director,has composed this thriller that simply makes my toetips burn from the bad acting, bad timeline and edited timeline, with an original idea but so lost story about a heist and hijacking of ......a church(?)....and this church are bulletproof and terrorsafe with state of the art surveillance and security force that are just armed with a mouthfull of nothing, and the head of security shines his twinkling cowboy revolver and has his own plan,the rest of the crew though have no guns,no tazers ,no sticks to beat the enemy with. its so filled with holy spirit in the start that they totally forget to lock the doors that day,namely the day that the new security chief starts in her job. and this freak manages to lock herself out of the building, while the heisters equiped with assault rifles and god nows what, and masks to disguise their faces , where each thug has its own color from gold and silver to blue and white. how stupid do you think real terrorists are mr.wes miller? every geek with a mind of itself would never attack a target not being able to differ between his ''armed brothers''. i think you should rewrite the story to a bank,casino or a brothel to beheist, and use one color on the outfit next time.
im an old grumpy man that can take a lot but this was like tide on astronomical low caused by high pressure in the producers cylinder head, that makes me krank. i couldve said so much more,but the editor of this site may not like it,and will shred it, but this is my sincere review . no recommendations from me
It's like those crappy self published low budge movies that Left Behind makers film, or the idiots who filmed those ayn rand movies...
The camera was blurry several times....overly predictable....would be a great attanna TV movie
This movie was probably made with a ultra-low cost budget or no budget at all. "Anyone can make a movie"style.
Bad acting, bad effects, bad scenario, bad sound, bad everything.
I have not a clue how this "movie" found its way to IMDb, Netflix, and so on.
I have seen better editing and special effects done with a smartphone.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 29 minuti
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti