VALUTAZIONE IMDb
7,2/10
2799
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaWitness the wrenching emotions that accompany end-of-life decisions as doctors, patients and families in a hospital ICU face harrowing choices.Witness the wrenching emotions that accompany end-of-life decisions as doctors, patients and families in a hospital ICU face harrowing choices.Witness the wrenching emotions that accompany end-of-life decisions as doctors, patients and families in a hospital ICU face harrowing choices.
- Candidato a 1 Oscar
- 2 vittorie e 5 candidature totali
Monica Bhargava
- Self
- (as Monica Bhargava M.D.)
Jessica Zitter
- Self
- (as Jessica Nutik Zitter M.D.)
Recensioni in evidenza
Had a real rough time with this one. I though about dying the entire time. Really jacked me up with a bad anxiety freak out. Solid watch though considering all things.
There's probably no decision that's harder than the decision about the end of life - especially when you're in the position of having to make (or at least heavily influence) the decision. Most of us have probably at some point had to make that decision for a beloved pet, but we hope and we pray that we don't have to face the decision for a family member. But sometimes we do. People have a tendency not to just fall asleep and not wake up, or to simply die in an instant. People get sick - and then sicker, and sicker still. And somewhere along the way, the question comes up - how far should we go with this? If you've ever been in the position of having to face those questions (and I have been personally within my own family, and as a pastor I've stood with families who've been faced with this decision) then you'll certainly be moved by this short film, and by the situations depicted.
This is a 24 minute short film that depicts these decisions being made in what seems to be an ICU in a major city. Doctors, nurses, families and patients all struggle together with the decision. Machines or no machines? Tubes or no tubes? Just how far do we go to keep a person alive who has no reasonable prospect for any significant recovery and when the quality of life has disappeared? It's a heart-wrenching decision for everyone, and that's one thing that becomes clear. Even the doctors - who surely have to do this a lot - are sometimes uncertain, and it's emotionally draining on them as well. Everyone wants and hopes for and prays for a miracle, but usually they don't come. If you've never been through this kind of situation and you want to get a glimpse of the sorts of things you struggle with, this is worth watching.
The main weakness I saw here was that it was so short. We got no real depth into any of the patients. There was no chance to get to know them or their families. We could sympathize (and perhaps empathize, if you've been through this) with them, but although the situations are moving, there's no real emotional connection with the people involved. I almost had the sense that I was intruding into some place that I had no business being. I think if more of the backstories had been made known, that might not have been the case.
Still, this is sobering and thought-provoking. As one of the people in the movie said, "everyone in this room is going to die one day." It's true. Everyone reading this review is going to die one day, and so is the person writing it. This certainly does make you cognizant of your own mortality and it leaves you hoping that you have an easier end than the patients depicted here. (7/10)
This is a 24 minute short film that depicts these decisions being made in what seems to be an ICU in a major city. Doctors, nurses, families and patients all struggle together with the decision. Machines or no machines? Tubes or no tubes? Just how far do we go to keep a person alive who has no reasonable prospect for any significant recovery and when the quality of life has disappeared? It's a heart-wrenching decision for everyone, and that's one thing that becomes clear. Even the doctors - who surely have to do this a lot - are sometimes uncertain, and it's emotionally draining on them as well. Everyone wants and hopes for and prays for a miracle, but usually they don't come. If you've never been through this kind of situation and you want to get a glimpse of the sorts of things you struggle with, this is worth watching.
The main weakness I saw here was that it was so short. We got no real depth into any of the patients. There was no chance to get to know them or their families. We could sympathize (and perhaps empathize, if you've been through this) with them, but although the situations are moving, there's no real emotional connection with the people involved. I almost had the sense that I was intruding into some place that I had no business being. I think if more of the backstories had been made known, that might not have been the case.
Still, this is sobering and thought-provoking. As one of the people in the movie said, "everyone in this room is going to die one day." It's true. Everyone reading this review is going to die one day, and so is the person writing it. This certainly does make you cognizant of your own mortality and it leaves you hoping that you have an easier end than the patients depicted here. (7/10)
Watching the curly haired doctor be so quick to tell families to "pull the plug" was discouraging. You could tell the other doctors didn't share her thoughts in the cases shown. I hope she reflects on herself when she watches this and sees that she can do better.
Extremis was made for us to make a visit and bring out our deepest and most anguished feeling: death!
I had to create an account just to write a review for 1. To criticise american medicine and to 2. Criticise these brainless reviews.
It seemed like many of the patients in the show were terminal patients whose steady decline of long-term ilnesses had lead them to the ICU. The show based a lot around the questions wheter to put the patient on a ventilator or not. In many countries it is quite easy to determine this - if a patient has the possibility of recovery to a meaningful state, they can be hooked to a machine while the body fixes itself and administered medicine works its wonders. This means for example that patients whose breathing function has declined because of a progressive untreatable disease gain nothing with ventilators. They would simply be put under anesthesia and they would die on the machine - one cannot recover to a state better than in which the person was before the acute sickness that brought them in the hospital. Many of the patients depicted indeed seemed chronically ill and the respirator does not offer to them any form of hope - yet they were put there for even months and they then finally died - not very ethical i would say.
Second about these comments criticizing the doctor for not giving more hope and trying to talk family members out of putting their loved ones on a ventilator. In response to one of these comments about key part of recovery being "hope". Thats absolute BS, key part is being realistic and managing expectations and not prolonging suffering. While there still is hope for recovery, treatment is continued of course. The doctor knew that these patients had nothing to gain and they would die on the tubes. A doctors job is not to give false hope but to clearly communicate to the family that the end is near and to take the best of it.
In short: ventilators are only for those who can get better. Terminally ill people cannot. Ventilator does not fix a heart, lungs, kidneys etc that are shutting down because of a long term illness. It can only give time for the body to heal after a sudden onset disease that is curable. Ventilators should be reserved for these people only - for the chronically ill they are a long kiss of death.
It seemed like many of the patients in the show were terminal patients whose steady decline of long-term ilnesses had lead them to the ICU. The show based a lot around the questions wheter to put the patient on a ventilator or not. In many countries it is quite easy to determine this - if a patient has the possibility of recovery to a meaningful state, they can be hooked to a machine while the body fixes itself and administered medicine works its wonders. This means for example that patients whose breathing function has declined because of a progressive untreatable disease gain nothing with ventilators. They would simply be put under anesthesia and they would die on the machine - one cannot recover to a state better than in which the person was before the acute sickness that brought them in the hospital. Many of the patients depicted indeed seemed chronically ill and the respirator does not offer to them any form of hope - yet they were put there for even months and they then finally died - not very ethical i would say.
Second about these comments criticizing the doctor for not giving more hope and trying to talk family members out of putting their loved ones on a ventilator. In response to one of these comments about key part of recovery being "hope". Thats absolute BS, key part is being realistic and managing expectations and not prolonging suffering. While there still is hope for recovery, treatment is continued of course. The doctor knew that these patients had nothing to gain and they would die on the tubes. A doctors job is not to give false hope but to clearly communicate to the family that the end is near and to take the best of it.
In short: ventilators are only for those who can get better. Terminally ill people cannot. Ventilator does not fix a heart, lungs, kidneys etc that are shutting down because of a long term illness. It can only give time for the body to heal after a sudden onset disease that is curable. Ventilators should be reserved for these people only - for the chronically ill they are a long kiss of death.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizFirst Netflix Original short documentary
- ConnessioniFeatured in The Oscar Nominated Short Films 2017: Documentary (2017)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione24 minuti
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti