VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,8/10
16.998
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un assassino cerca di redimersi dopo che gli è stata data una seconda possibilità nella vita.Un assassino cerca di redimersi dopo che gli è stata data una seconda possibilità nella vita.Un assassino cerca di redimersi dopo che gli è stata data una seconda possibilità nella vita.
Qing Xu
- Lin Bisset
- (as Xu Qing)
Susan Ling Young
- Vicky Liu
- (as Susan Young)
Alex Anastasopoulos
- Sniper
- (as Alex Anlos)
Brendan Sean Murray
- Zee, Red Mountain Leader
- (as Brendan Murray)
Marty Kintu
- Technician
- (as Marty Kinto)
Recensioni in evidenza
1. Bad CGI. The use of CG blood ruined the parts that could have been really good. I don't see any reviews here pointing this out like in many other movies (John Wick) that use this shi**y effect and rarely gets called out. Imagine if they used the tried and tested blood squib, it would totally change the quality of this film.
2. The action is good overall but its lacking oomph. The pacing feels rushed. A lot of times the sound effects are not on point. The background music would drown the gunshots and everything else. The gun shots can range as loud as the footsteps. The balance is off.
3. Plot holes, some characters would know things that they shouldn't and would be in places that are questionable.
That being said, the story was surprisingly decent. There was chemistry between the characters. I like Travis' portrayal. I was able to connect with him without the story cheating. You don't get to see exactly what happened to his past or how it happened, it is unraveled bit by bit as the story goes.
Despite all of these flaws, it still came out decent. If only the things I've mentioned were put into use this film could even score as high as 8/10.
2. The action is good overall but its lacking oomph. The pacing feels rushed. A lot of times the sound effects are not on point. The background music would drown the gunshots and everything else. The gun shots can range as loud as the footsteps. The balance is off.
3. Plot holes, some characters would know things that they shouldn't and would be in places that are questionable.
That being said, the story was surprisingly decent. There was chemistry between the characters. I like Travis' portrayal. I was able to connect with him without the story cheating. You don't get to see exactly what happened to his past or how it happened, it is unraveled bit by bit as the story goes.
Despite all of these flaws, it still came out decent. If only the things I've mentioned were put into use this film could even score as high as 8/10.
I read the reviews pre-watching. In fact, the reviews are why I pushed it off.
I actually enjoyed this flick.
Yes, it was extremely predictable. This movie has been done 1000 different times, but still good!
I actually enjoyed this flick.
Yes, it was extremely predictable. This movie has been done 1000 different times, but still good!
60U
With an interesting plot and Ethan Hawke in the lead, it's baffling how this movie turned out so mediocre. 24 Hours To Live has some cool John Wick action scenes but they can be easily overlooked by the flawed and predictable story that left me bored halfway through.
This film tells the story of an assassin, who is shot by the bodyguard of the target he has to assassinate. He is mysteriously revived and is given another mission that lasts for 24 hours.
I keep thinking there is something wrong with this film, but I can't pinpoint what it is. Maybe it's because of the absurdity of reviving someone for 24 hours. Why try and succeed in the mission, when you'll die in 24 hours regardless of success or failure? Another thing is that there seems to be a lot of movie logic present. Why use an office that is completely exposed to being shot, when you're interviewing a high value target? The story doesn't make much sense.
I keep thinking there is something wrong with this film, but I can't pinpoint what it is. Maybe it's because of the absurdity of reviving someone for 24 hours. Why try and succeed in the mission, when you'll die in 24 hours regardless of success or failure? Another thing is that there seems to be a lot of movie logic present. Why use an office that is completely exposed to being shot, when you're interviewing a high value target? The story doesn't make much sense.
Travis Conrad (Ethan Hawke) is a former mercenary agent that worked to the notorious Red Mountain agency. Now he misses his beloved wife Kate (Jenna Upton) and son Adam (Owen de Wet) that died, and lives with his father-in-law Frank (Rutger Hauer) in Florida. One night, Travis is drinking in a bar and his former partner and friend Jim Morrow (Paul Anderson) offers him two million dollars per day to assassinate the former agent Keith Zera (Tyrone Keogh), who is a whistleblower that will disclose secrets about the Red Mountain. Zera is now under the protection of the efficient Interpol agent Lin Bisset (Qing Xu). Travis accepts the assignment, uses Lin's son Christopher (Jeremy Yong) to learn the whereabouts of his mother and has one night stand with her to find where Keith Zera is in her cellphone, but does not kill Lin in the morning. However, Lin discovers what Travis did and kills him. Out of the blue, Travis is revived by the mysterious Dr. Helen (Nathalie Boltt) that has developed a revival procedure after several experiments to the boss Wetzler (Liam Cunningham). Travis discloses the whereabouts of Keith Zera and is betrayed by Wetzler, and learns that he has only 24 hours to live. Now he decides to help Lin Bisset and destroy Red Mountain seeking redemption.
"24 Hours to Live" is a flawed but full of action feature film, with Ethan Hawke performing an action hero surprisingly good, which is uncommon to his successful career. It is also a chance to see the unforgettable Dutch actor Rutger Hauer again. The story is flawed, like action movies shall be, but it is highly attractive and underrated. Further, it is filmed in locations in South Africa, China and United States of America, with many car crashes. The conclusion gives a chance to the character Travis Conrad appears in another film, but after so many years, it seems that the studios are not interested. My vote is seven.
Title (Brazil): "Um Dia Para Viver" ("One Day to Live")
"24 Hours to Live" is a flawed but full of action feature film, with Ethan Hawke performing an action hero surprisingly good, which is uncommon to his successful career. It is also a chance to see the unforgettable Dutch actor Rutger Hauer again. The story is flawed, like action movies shall be, but it is highly attractive and underrated. Further, it is filmed in locations in South Africa, China and United States of America, with many car crashes. The conclusion gives a chance to the character Travis Conrad appears in another film, but after so many years, it seems that the studios are not interested. My vote is seven.
Title (Brazil): "Um Dia Para Viver" ("One Day to Live")
Lo sapevi?
- QuizNot interested in participating in this program at this time!
- BlooperIn the beginning beach scene it said Key West, Florida for its location. There are no mountains in the Florida keys.
- Citazioni
Travis Conrad: I don't want to kill you. I want the fish to like me.
- ConnessioniReferences 1997: fuga da New York (1981)
- Colonne sonoreSunrise Blues
Written by Charles Morgan
Performed by Chuck Morgan and The Front Page
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is 24 Hours to Live?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- 24 horas para sobrevivir
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Città del Capo, Sud Africa(Red Mountain Base)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 5.805.201 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 33min(93 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti