VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,7/10
2921
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaCass is a successful business woman who appears unsuccessful in her personal life and decides to try "Dater's Handbook" at her sister's encouragement; she dates several guys to test the proc... Leggi tuttoCass is a successful business woman who appears unsuccessful in her personal life and decides to try "Dater's Handbook" at her sister's encouragement; she dates several guys to test the process.Cass is a successful business woman who appears unsuccessful in her personal life and decides to try "Dater's Handbook" at her sister's encouragement; she dates several guys to test the process.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Drew Ray Tanner
- Phil
- (as Drew Tanner)
Recensioni in evidenza
They made it so obviously which is the right guy for her, that she looks like an idiot for not just picking him early on.
Also, the whole movie is a false dilemma fallacy. Can't a girl have a guy who's dependable AND chivalrous AND fun?
The sister got on my nerves. Apparently, she's unhappy in her marriage, and is trying to get a vicarious do-over through her sister's love life. And she follows some lady's self-help book so religiously, boiling love down to a checklist or formula.
And finally, neither guy ever learns that the protagonist's been two-timing them.
Also, the whole movie is a false dilemma fallacy. Can't a girl have a guy who's dependable AND chivalrous AND fun?
The sister got on my nerves. Apparently, she's unhappy in her marriage, and is trying to get a vicarious do-over through her sister's love life. And she follows some lady's self-help book so religiously, boiling love down to a checklist or formula.
And finally, neither guy ever learns that the protagonist's been two-timing them.
Like another reviewer I wanted to watch this, as never having seen Suits, I wanted to see how Meghan Markle fared as an actress, as she has since married into our Royal family.
Hmmmmmm, honestly ? Clearly Meryl Streep won't be having sleepless nights. If Ms Markle had been any good, then Hollywood 'proper' would have snapped her up, instead of her languishing in the stable of able but lightweight Hallmark Channel actors.
The British press have made much of her former career as an actress - would they do so if they had seen this offering ? I rather think not.
Hmmmmmm, honestly ? Clearly Meryl Streep won't be having sleepless nights. If Ms Markle had been any good, then Hollywood 'proper' would have snapped her up, instead of her languishing in the stable of able but lightweight Hallmark Channel actors.
The British press have made much of her former career as an actress - would they do so if they had seen this offering ? I rather think not.
I confess I wanted to watch this because it's Prince Harry's girlfriend in the lead role - Meghan Markle. I don't watch Suits so this was a chance to see what she is like on screen and she is quite charming It's quite a cute story about a woman relying on a dating handbook and juggling 2 suitors. One is a dependable and sensible type, one is more spontaneous and passionate. Guess which one she ends up with. It's quite interesting to see the differences between the two. Her choice isn't totally convincing and the guys are a little stereotypical one dimensional.
Okay for one watch.
Okay for one watch.
I watched this movie mostly to see Megan Markle in it. I didn't watch Suits so I did't know what to expect of her acting. It was a mediocre movie. I thought she over acted throughout the movie. It was a cute movie and she did have chemistry with Christoper. It was a cute Hallmark movie.
The huge problem of film is, unfortunatelly, Meghan Markle. Her wood acting, fake moments, arrogance and a sort of serious supperficiality.
The effort to introduce the Jane Austen touch works just wrong because the final is so predictable and formal crafted.
The good parts - the effort of supporting cast to save the film and the nice contribution of Kristoffer Poloha in this sense. Sure, the work of Jonathan Scarfe is , in same measure, precious, but his role is constructed exactly for suggest who will be the winner. Unfortunatelly, the film , centred around Markle , has poor chances to be more than a very modest Hallmark.
The effort to introduce the Jane Austen touch works just wrong because the final is so predictable and formal crafted.
The good parts - the effort of supporting cast to save the film and the nice contribution of Kristoffer Poloha in this sense. Sure, the work of Jonathan Scarfe is , in same measure, precious, but his role is constructed exactly for suggest who will be the winner. Unfortunatelly, the film , centred around Markle , has poor chances to be more than a very modest Hallmark.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizMegan Markle's final movie role before retiring from acting prior to her marriage to (Prince) Harry in 2018.
- BlooperIn the bowling alley scene, when Cass (Meghan Markle) rolls her ball between the legs of Robert (Kristoffer Polaha), as the pins are falling, rods are clearly visible pushing them down making it appear that she bowled a strike.
- ConnessioniReferenced in It's Christmastown: 021 - The Duchess of Sussex - FOOD CRIMINAL (2018)
- Colonne sonoreKeep on Loving You
Written by Kevin Cronin
Performed by REO Speedwagon
Heard when Robert falls off the treadmill and when they go to the concert, as well as during the final kiss before the credits roll.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Il manuale degli appuntamenti (2016) officially released in Canada in English?
Rispondi