VALUTAZIONE IMDb
3,0/10
1557
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Uno studente a corto di soldi inizia a fare il turno di notte in un museo e sospetta che una delle mostre, una raccapricciante bambola vintage di nome Robert, sia viva e stia seminando il ca... Leggi tuttoUno studente a corto di soldi inizia a fare il turno di notte in un museo e sospetta che una delle mostre, una raccapricciante bambola vintage di nome Robert, sia viva e stia seminando il caos dopo ore.Uno studente a corto di soldi inizia a fare il turno di notte in un museo e sospetta che una delle mostre, una raccapricciante bambola vintage di nome Robert, sia viva e stia seminando il caos dopo ore.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Suzanne Dallaway
- Jenny Otto
- (as Suzie Frances Garton)
Recensioni in evidenza
A very slight improvement over the first film. But I mean slight. The action shifts to the modern day, where Robert's now a museum exhibit, except of course he's still up to no good. The acting's still cringy but not quite so much, and the inspiration seems to be CHILD'S PLAY which gives this one more of a slasher film feel.
A young woman takes a job on the night shift in a small curio museum. When her coworkers' bodies begin piling up, the prime suspect is one of the displays, a hideous doll which is purported to be possessed.
Very loosely based on a real story (relocated from early 20th century Florida to contemporary Britain), the original "Robert" was a tedious movie, paced at the speed of evolution, with characters who behaved idiotically and cheaper effects than the worst of the Charles Band killer-doll flicks. This time around, the pace is a little better (though it still takes far too long to get going), the characters are slightly more likable (a returning cast member steps up their game and the rest of the performances are decent) and the effects are... well, about the same. Frankly, it's a case of been there, done that, seen it - and much better. But sadly, I've also seen much worse. The biggest problem with these films is that suspense isn't handled well, it's draaaaagged out to the point of boredom and the payoff generally sucks.
It's sort of a shame that this trilogy (a third film is slated to be released next year) has been so painfully mediocre, cuz it's kind of disrespectful to the real Robert, who deserves a more faithful telling of his bizarre tale. Still, this sequel's a few rungs above the original, so perhaps the third film might actually be good.
Very loosely based on a real story (relocated from early 20th century Florida to contemporary Britain), the original "Robert" was a tedious movie, paced at the speed of evolution, with characters who behaved idiotically and cheaper effects than the worst of the Charles Band killer-doll flicks. This time around, the pace is a little better (though it still takes far too long to get going), the characters are slightly more likable (a returning cast member steps up their game and the rest of the performances are decent) and the effects are... well, about the same. Frankly, it's a case of been there, done that, seen it - and much better. But sadly, I've also seen much worse. The biggest problem with these films is that suspense isn't handled well, it's draaaaagged out to the point of boredom and the payoff generally sucks.
It's sort of a shame that this trilogy (a third film is slated to be released next year) has been so painfully mediocre, cuz it's kind of disrespectful to the real Robert, who deserves a more faithful telling of his bizarre tale. Still, this sequel's a few rungs above the original, so perhaps the third film might actually be good.
Right, let's be honest, it's no Annabelle, but in this second outing, Robert is now housed in a museum, and of course causes mayhem when the new cleaner arrives.
I'm not sure why expectations from some were seemingly quite high, surely they must have seen the first?
It's low budget, it's silly, but it's not without some level of charm, I liked the accompanying music, it was definitely a little creepy, and atmospheric.
The acting, was decent I thought, some of it was good, some was average.
Robert, if only he could have been a little more animated, he was perhaps a little static, his footsteps were rather cute I thought.
I loved the atmosphere of the opening and closing scenes, and that security guard was very cute.
It wasn't bad, 5/10.
I'm not sure why expectations from some were seemingly quite high, surely they must have seen the first?
It's low budget, it's silly, but it's not without some level of charm, I liked the accompanying music, it was definitely a little creepy, and atmospheric.
The acting, was decent I thought, some of it was good, some was average.
Robert, if only he could have been a little more animated, he was perhaps a little static, his footsteps were rather cute I thought.
I loved the atmosphere of the opening and closing scenes, and that security guard was very cute.
It wasn't bad, 5/10.
The story is played out some years after the first movie. This time with Emily Barker. A student who takes a night job at a museum to pay of loans. Unfortanly for her this is the new home for Robert the doll. After a while working as a cleaner, Emily starts getting a feeling something's wrong in the museum. she is not wrong.
I love horror movies and i was so scared for dolls after seeing Chucky many years ago. Unfortanly this movie is nothing like Chucky or the newer Annabell. The first movie was badly written. Slow going Forward. The characters never felt realistic when they talked to each other and when the doll was on screen it was so bad it made you laugh. This movie is not better. The characters are still bad. The doll still just look so foolish and the story is so slow. Nothing happens the first 25 minutes.
If you as me love horror movies with killing dolls. Watch Chucky or The boy instead. Light years better than this school project.
I love horror movies and i was so scared for dolls after seeing Chucky many years ago. Unfortanly this movie is nothing like Chucky or the newer Annabell. The first movie was badly written. Slow going Forward. The characters never felt realistic when they talked to each other and when the doll was on screen it was so bad it made you laugh. This movie is not better. The characters are still bad. The doll still just look so foolish and the story is so slow. Nothing happens the first 25 minutes.
If you as me love horror movies with killing dolls. Watch Chucky or The boy instead. Light years better than this school project.
Just not good. Not very original and I think even a documentary about Robert The Doll is scarier. Bad effects among other things just come off as negative. Since I know quite a bit about the real Robert The Doll I didn't find it very impressive.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizIn the real life case Robert Eugene Otto (Gene) was first given Robert the Doll in 1906, when he was just six years old, by an angry Bahamian servant with an interest in black magic and voodoo. It was rumored that the gift was the servant's revenge for being mistreated by the Otto family. Eugene Otto kept Robert by his side until his death in 1974. It is rumored that Otto's wife, Anne, was driven insane by her husband's lifelong devotion to the doll.
- ConnessioniFollowed by Robert and the Toymaker (2017)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is The Curse of Robert the Doll?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 19.096 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 19min(79 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.22:1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti