[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario delle usciteI migliori 250 filmI film più popolariEsplora film per genereCampione d’incassiOrari e bigliettiNotizie sui filmFilm indiani in evidenza
    Cosa c’è in TV e in streamingLe migliori 250 serieLe serie più popolariEsplora serie per genereNotizie TV
    Cosa guardareTrailer più recentiOriginali IMDbPreferiti IMDbIn evidenza su IMDbGuida all'intrattenimento per la famigliaPodcast IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralTutti gli eventi
    Nato oggiCelebrità più popolariNotizie sulle celebrità
    Centro assistenzaZona contributoriSondaggi
Per i professionisti del settore
  • Lingua
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista Video
Accedi
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usa l'app
  • Il Cast e la Troupe
  • Recensioni degli utenti
  • Quiz
  • Domande frequenti
IMDbPro

Risk

  • 2016
  • TV-MA
  • 1h 26min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,3/10
2410
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Risk (2016)
Cornered in a tiny building for half a decade, Julian Assange is undeterred even as the legal jeopardy he faces threatens to undermine the organization he leads and fracture the movement he inspired. Capturing this story with unprecedented access, Laura Poitras finds herself caught between the motives and contradictions of Assange and his inner circle.
Riproduci trailer1:28
2 video
10 foto
Un documentario

Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaThe story of WikiLeak's editor-in-chief Julian Assange as seen by documentary filmmaker Laura Poitras.The story of WikiLeak's editor-in-chief Julian Assange as seen by documentary filmmaker Laura Poitras.The story of WikiLeak's editor-in-chief Julian Assange as seen by documentary filmmaker Laura Poitras.

  • Regia
    • Laura Poitras
  • Sceneggiatura
    • Jonathan Oppenheim
    • Laura Poitras
  • Star
    • Julian Assange
    • Sarah Harrison
    • Jacob Appelbaum
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • VALUTAZIONE IMDb
    6,3/10
    2410
    LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
    • Regia
      • Laura Poitras
    • Sceneggiatura
      • Jonathan Oppenheim
      • Laura Poitras
    • Star
      • Julian Assange
      • Sarah Harrison
      • Jacob Appelbaum
    • 16Recensioni degli utenti
    • 71Recensioni della critica
    • 72Metascore
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
    • Premi
      • 4 candidature totali

    Video2

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 1:28
    Official Trailer
    Risk
    Trailer 1:28
    Risk
    Risk
    Trailer 1:28
    Risk

    Foto9

    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    + 4
    Visualizza poster

    Interpreti principali37

    Modifica
    Julian Assange
    Julian Assange
    • Self
    Sarah Harrison
    Sarah Harrison
    • Self
    Jacob Appelbaum
    Jacob Appelbaum
    • Self
    Joseph Farrell
    • Self
    Renata Avila
    Renata Avila
    • Self - Lawyer
    Jennifer Robinson
    Jennifer Robinson
    • Self - Lawyer
    Erinn Clark
    • Self - Tor Project developer
    Laura Poitras
    Laura Poitras
    • Self
    • (voce)
    Ana Alban
    • Self - Ecuadorian ambassador
    Christine Assange
    • Self - Julian's mother
    Louis Bladel
    Louis Bladel
    • Self - FBI counterintelligence
    • (as Special Agent Louis Bladel)
    Hillary Clinton
    Hillary Clinton
    • Self
    • (filmato d'archivio)
    Amal Clooney
    Amal Clooney
    • Self - Lawyer
    James Comey
    James Comey
    • Self
    • (filmato d'archivio)
    Anderson Cooper
    Anderson Cooper
    • Self
    • (audio di repertorio)
    Roger Dingledine
    Roger Dingledine
    • Self - Tor Project
    Daniel Ellsberg
    Daniel Ellsberg
    • Self
    Laura Ellsberg
    • Self
    • Regia
      • Laura Poitras
    • Sceneggiatura
      • Jonathan Oppenheim
      • Laura Poitras
    • Tutti gli interpreti e le troupe
    • Produzione, botteghino e altro su IMDbPro

    Recensioni degli utenti16

    6,32.4K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Recensioni in evidenza

    5skepticskeptical

    Disappointing

    I was expecting to gain some insight from RISK, which is said to have been filmed over six years. Instead, I came away wondering what the point of the film was supposed to be. If Laura Poitras had not directed CitizenFour, I would probably conclude on the basis of this work that she is a mediocre filmmaker. The only thing I really learned is that Julian Assange appears to have been physically involved with Susan Harrison but did not seem (at least from the film clips) to like her very much. The relationship ended after she helped Snowden when it was no longer safe for her to travel back to London, given the real risk of being arrested. The most interesting part of the film is the presentation of Susan Harrison, which raises the questions of why and how she became involved in the cases of both Julian Assange and Edward Snowden.

    The directorial voice-over "production notes" are ridiculous and should not be in this work at all. Who cares? What is this film really supposed to be about? Just another symptom of these narcissistic times... As regards Assange himself, Risk strikes me as something of a nothing burger.
    JohnDeSando

    Take a risk--see an informative and entertaining doc.

    "We don't have a problem, you have a problem." Julian Assange

    As the ever-cool Assange announces to Hillary's campaign that leaks are forthcoming, he is slightly wrong: No one in the WikiLeaks world, on either side, is without problems. For Assange, four years of asylum-imprisonment in the London Ecuador embassy could not be easy; for Hillary, leaked messages and her private use of a server are only the beginnings of her problems.

    It's all about info and who commands it—Laura Poitras's doc, Risk, lets us in to the private world of the Australian journalist and programmer Assange, founder of WikiLeaks in 2006, enabler of Robert Snowden, and purveyor of thousands of pages of secret government documents.

    Poitras does a remarkable job keeping above the political sides, even admitting at one point that she does not trust Assange. She makes her presence known from voice over, yet rarely pushes an agenda other than entertaining and enlightening her audience.

    Poitras gives the audience as much insight as they could hope for with a subject as opaque as might be expected: "What does it matter how I feel?" (Assange) Brief moments with Lady Gaga and Daniel Ellsberg provide humorous respite from the monotony of Assange's imprisonment.

    Assange's answer as to why he does WikiLeaks is as evasive as his answers to most questions. Deflecting accusations of sexual harassment is pure Assange: He gently accuses hardcore feminists of a conspiracy against him. Sweden still wants to interview him about the charges.

    Whereas in Citizenfour, Poitras let Snowden come off as a hero, she does not cut the low-key Risk in a way to make Assange saintly: "The risk of inaction is extremely high," he says in a reflection of his activist mentality and the title of the film.

    He is smooth and careful, partly right and partly wrong, just like this documentary.
    5LeonLouisRicci

    Scattershot Indecipherable Mess...Feels Like the Thing Got Out of Hand

    Documentary Filmmaker Laura Poitras ("Citizenfour" (2014) follows up that Oscar Winner with this "Julian Assange", "Wikileaks" Exploration and it is a Mess. Suffering from a Number of Outside Influences the Film became even More Messy after its Initial Release. It was pulled and Re-Edited and Re-Released.

    The Movie is Confusing, Scattered, Lacks Focus and can cause Headaches trying to Follow the Themes or the Intent. It Plays like a Crazy Women's Quilt. Even more so if You are Unfamiliar with the Players or the Subjects Presented in a Haze of Haphazard History. Keeping Things Straight as the Film Unfolds is a Daunting Task.

    It Hops and Flops all over the place. Locations and Points of Interest Covered are so Random it Feels like a Treasure Hunt and the "X" is Never Found. It moves here and there and Never Settles. Nothing is very Clear. Ambiguity Reigns, and those Seeking Insight or Truth about any of this will be Disappointed.

    The Soap Opera Elements Overtake the Political and the Historical and it almost Devolves into a "People Magazine" Kind of Thing. Surely the Intentions were anything but. But in the End that's what it Feels Like. The Movie got Spoiled somewhere, sometime along the way and the Restoration to Something Palatable was Unsuccessful.
    Gordon-11

    Disappointing

    This film tells the first hand story of Julian Assange, and his life after launching the leaks website.

    It is very interesting to see what goes on around Assange up close, as there is probably very little opportunity to do so. The opening of the film is strong, as the characters try to get in touch with senior government officials. However, the film goes downhill quickly, mostly because there is little narrative to what is shown on the screen. For example, there is a scene where Julian puts a device on the window sill, and I have no idea what is going on. The scene where he gets a haircut, and doing boxing can be enhanced by a narration that he could not leave the embassy. To me, the documentary is so personal to the filmmakers, that they forgot that viewers are not in the middle of it. Viewers can't follow the scenes as they could.
    6SteveMierzejewski

    The Risk May Be Worth It For Some

    The reviews for this documentary are all over the place. Reviewers who are firm advocates of WikiLeaks tend to over-exaggerate the film's virtues, while those who find the organization's actions reprehensible tend to hate it. I watched the film as an objective reviewer.

    Some have called the film a sleeper and there are parts of the film that live up to that branding. These occur mainly at the beginning of the film when scenes shift quickly and conversations are somewhat baffling and vapid.

    Assange emerges as an emotionally remote character who hides his true personality behind his dedication to WikiLeaks. He even states that what he does is more important than who he is. The only scene in which we get a glimpse into his repressed character is when he is interviewed by Lady Gaga, dressed in her Wicked-Witch-of-the West costume. Ms. Gaga, like most celebrities, tries to hide her insecurity behind false bravado and seemingly unfiltered, carefree questions which tell us more about her than Assange. In a clear case of projection, she asks about his relationship to his parents, wherein Assange claimed his father was "abstract".

    We do get some glimpses into the life Assange lives within the Ecuadorean Embassy. We learn about his relationships with his team and find out a few ways that the organization keeps itself protected from government intrusion. This may hold some interest for some viewers.

    The latter half of the film is more interesting, especially when he talks about the DNC hacking. I only wish this were expanded more as it is more timely. It is at this point in the film that Assange talks about the earth as so interconnected that any action must be considered a global action. It is an interesting an important viewpoint that should be considered. It is not simply "think globally, act locally". It is more that even a small local action may have global implications.

    The film leaves many questions unanswered and, as a whole, doesn't flow very well. It could have been better made. There is nothing compelling in it, meaning that a viewer may be tempted to stop watching the film entirely at certain points. There is no hook that makes us want to see how it ends. There are no compelling relationships and some issues seem unresolved that could easily have been. Still, a few scenes are definitely worth seeing.

    For those interested in the world of cyber security, political intrigue, and government surveillance, this documentary may be of interest. For the general public, however, it may simply be too dull.

    Altri elementi simili

    We Steal Secrets: The Story of WikiLeaks
    6,9
    We Steal Secrets: The Story of WikiLeaks
    Citizenfour
    8,0
    Citizenfour
    My Country, My Country
    7,0
    My Country, My Country
    Il quinto potere
    6,2
    Il quinto potere
    Hacking Robot
    7,8
    Hacking Robot
    La mia notte con Maud
    7,8
    La mia notte con Maud
    Nuevo orden
    6,5
    Nuevo orden
    The Careful Massacre of the Bourgeoisie
    7,5
    The Careful Massacre of the Bourgeoisie
    The Oath
    7,2
    The Oath
    Snowden
    7,3
    Snowden
    Tutta la bellezza e il dolore
    7,5
    Tutta la bellezza e il dolore
    Grey Gardens
    7,5
    Grey Gardens

    Trama

    Modifica

    Lo sapevi?

    Modifica
    • Quiz
      The WikiLeaks lawyers Margaret Ratner Kunstler, Deborah Hrbek, Renata Avila and Melinda Taylor published an 'opinion piece' in Newsweek on May 17, 2017; WikiLeaks announced on the same day on Twitter that they may sue Laura Poitras: "We are lawyers for WikiLeaks. We are speaking out because we believe that Laura Poitras's film Risk (2016), released in U.S. theaters on May 5 this year, places our clients in legal jeopardy. (...) Our first issue with "Risk" is that the film was edited in New York, where the raw footage can more easily be seized by the U.S. government. By moving the editing location from Berlin to the U.S., Poitras has endangered our clients and reneged on written agreements with WikiLeaks that explicitly forbid her from editing the footage in the United States. (...) Poitras has also violated her unambiguous promise to the subjects of the film that they would have an opportunity to review the film in advance and request changes, and that they could decline to appear if they or their lawyers felt that the movie put them at risk. Had the filmmaker not agreed to these express conditions, WikiLeaks' staff would not have allowed themselves to be filmed in the first place. Despite repeated requests, neither the subjects of the film nor their attorneys were granted a prior viewing of the film that Poitras intended to release in the U.S.. When, along with the general public, we were finally able to view "Risk", we were dismayed to discover that the film released in theaters is a different version, not only from that which premiered at Cannes the year before, but also from the version screened for Julian Assange and his UK counsel at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. The film viewed in the Embassy just one month prior to its U.S. release was shorn of all narration and omitted numerous new scenes, significantly changing its tenor. That the 'real' film contained these elements was concealed, preventing Assange from exercising his contractual rights. Prior to its initial U.S. release, seven of the participants submitted non-consent forms to the producers advising Poitras and her team that they did not want to appear in the film. Regardless, Poitras went ahead and released it. (...) To convince the audience of her point about the prevalence of sexism, Poitras has marginalized and demeaned a number of women who work for WikiLeaks, choosing instead to give men most of the airtime and leaving scenes depicting the significant contributions of the women WikiLeaks journalists on the cutting room floor. In their place, we now see an intense focus on women taking instructions and throwing off adoring looks. Sarah Harrison, for example, a brilliant journalist and winner of the Willy Brandt prize for "exceptional political courage," who at considerable personal risk helped Edward Snowden obtain political asylum, and who was accurately portrayed as having a central role in WikiLeaks work in the Cannes version, is now depicted as little more than a minion. Exactly what caused this pivot is not entirely clear. (...) The reason for the shift seems to be contained in the newly added voiceover, in which Poitras divulges that she was involved in an intimate relationship with one of the film's primary subjects, award-winning journalist Jacob Appelbaum. Appelbaum appears prominently in Poitras' Citizenfour (2014) as well as in "Risk". Although he does not work for WikiLeaks, Poitras conflates WikiLeaks with the organization he did work for, Tor, and makes him a central focus of the current version of "Risk". The Cannes premiere of "Risk" portrayed Appelbaum in a flattering light and Poitras did not disclose the nature of their relationship at that time. (...) Poitras was criticized after Cannes for appearing to be overly sympathetic to WikiLeaks. Instead of providing us with a more objective portrayal of her subject matter, she has re-framed her story to turn "Risk" into a film by Laura Poitras about Laura Poitras; a rather late coming-of-age story about the filmmaker discovering that there is sexism in her social and professional circles. Instead of a documentary about the abuse of state power and WikiLeaks' important role in exposing it, the emphasis of the film is now to highlight hotly disputed claims about an ex-boyfriend. We have to ask: Why choose this moment in history, when First Amendment and other fundamental rights are under attack, to undermine the credibility of an organization dedicated to government transparency and freedom of the press? (...) "Risk" might win attention for Poitras by pandering to tabloid narratives about its subjects, but it has done a great disservice to her fellow documentarians, and has profoundly betrayed her friends, her colleagues and her journalistic integrity."
    • Citazioni

      Julian Assange: We don't have a problem, you have a problem.

    • Connessioni
      Features Collateral Murder (2010)

    I più visti

    Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
    Accedi

    Domande frequenti17

    • How long is Risk?Powered by Alexa

    Dettagli

    Modifica
    • Data di uscita
      • 12 maggio 2017 (Stati Uniti)
    • Paesi di origine
      • Germania
      • Stati Uniti
    • Siti ufficiali
      • Official Facebook
      • Official site
    • Lingue
      • Inglese
      • Arabo
      • Spagnolo
      • Tedesco
    • Celebre anche come
      • Риск
    • Luoghi delle riprese
      • Londra, Inghilterra, Regno Unito
    • Aziende produttrici
      • Praxis Films Berlin
      • Praxis Films
      • Field of Vision (II)
    • Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro

    Botteghino

    Modifica
    • Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
      • 200.219 USD
    • Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
      • 76.327 USD
      • 7 mag 2017
    • Lordo in tutto il mondo
      • 214.669 USD
    Vedi le informazioni dettagliate del botteghino su IMDbPro

    Specifiche tecniche

    Modifica
    • Tempo di esecuzione
      • 1h 26min(86 min)
    • Colore
      • Color
    • Mix di suoni
      • Stereo
    • Proporzioni
      • 1.78 : 1

    Contribuisci a questa pagina

    Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
    • Ottieni maggiori informazioni sulla partecipazione
    Modifica pagina

    Altre pagine da esplorare

    Visti di recente

    Abilita i cookie del browser per utilizzare questa funzione. Maggiori informazioni.
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Accedi per avere maggiore accessoAccedi per avere maggiore accesso
    Segui IMDb sui social
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Per Android e iOS
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    • Aiuto
    • Indice del sito
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Prendi in licenza i dati di IMDb
    • Sala stampa
    • Pubblicità
    • Lavoro
    • Condizioni d'uso
    • Informativa sulla privacy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una società Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.