Recensioni degli utenti

Acting: Decent for what little characterization they had. I thought the blonde girl and black girl were decent, cringe at times but easy to root for. The villain was also pretty darn good and I was mind blown when I finished the movie and only after realized it was bloody tom Felton from Harry Potter! Amazing.

Music: trash. The scenes that were supposed to be fast paced and exciting turn into anti climactic messes partly because of the music and also average shots and stunt co-ordination.

Story: A really great story on paper but with average cgi, not the best directing, characterization, or music it becomes a chore to get through. Don't get me wrong I loved certain parts and it made my kid brain activate and love the idea and certain fantasy parts. This however could have been really awesome and is only left to be desired for small children.

Summary: Not the best but definitely not horrible. A real good foundation with some highlights here and there but this movie is mainly for kids and I'd suggest it only for adults if you just love fantasy and don't mind some average quality parts.

Seeing reviews here saying that we have to remember that this was a movie for kids.... but even my kids didn't wanna watch it after a half and hour 😅

It goods for kids ..I didn't had any expectation since I'm a adult and I had time so gave it watch and it was alright

Literally EVERYTHING about this movie is a cliché... Every scene, every action, every character... The characters are boring and flat. The main character its just a mary sue. The story is like every Netflix movie... Idk if Netflix is even trying at this point, all their teen movies are the same movie but with different cast... And this is just a kids adaptation of that. Your kids have A LOT of things to watch on Netflix before this generic movie

This is a good movie for kids! As mentioned in the other comments the gci monsters could've been better. I think Tom Felton did a great job. The end is predictable but so is every kids movie. Not to keep talking about the other comments but the movie isn't terrifying or scary but yet again it's for children. Overall I thought it was a good movie. I hadn't seen this concept before which was cool!

This is an original okay kids movie. The acting was fine and clearly Tom Felton studied Michael Keaton as Beetlejuice but he did great. With a normal 90 min runtime (which is also good in stead of those too long 2hrs movies) it is short enough to not get irritated by some plotholes.

The premise of the film has a lot of potential but the results are incredibly lackluster. It's a collage of elements from better movies that brings nothing new to the table. Not a single elements doesn't feel as if it was lifted or inspired by something that came before it. People are defending this by saying the movie is meant for children, but kids deserve rich, thoughtful, original films too!

The most disappointing moment (of any film I've seen in a long time), comes when a teenager sneers at the idea of earning $15 an hour. It's incredibly insensitive considering over 40% of working Americans are currently living on less (many of whom are considered essential workers and have been putting themselves at risk to help this country stay afloat). The creators clearly took the time to find a diverse cast, create strong female leads and glamorize STEM, so they obviously are trying to push this film as empowering to its young viewers. It's such a shame that they felt the need to show such distain for those earning a lower income. I know it was "just a joke" but these small interactions really do effect the way people view and treat others.

This is a good kid movie. It's not fully an original idea. But this movie is fun. If your a fan of KND (Code Name Kids Next Door), Agent Cody Banks, and Little Monsters. That's where I feel the creators of this film got this idea. The acting isn't perfect. It's good over all. There's some not so good acting. But the main character that you follow is good. The story isn't hard to follow. Which makes since. Cause this movie is meant for young kids. Probably ages 7 to 12. Honestly the CGI monsters could be a little better. If you where ok with how the smurfs looked in their movie then you'll be fine. Overall all I believe this will be a good family movie to add to the family Halloween movies to watch with the kids during October.

If you are anything between 5 to 10 and you are a girl, you might like it. Not suitable for anyone else. At 12 I remember watching horror movies like Friday 13th and Freddy. There is no adult in the movie for more than a couple of minutes all included and is painful to watch in family. Another hit and miss from Netflix. The idea could be good, but the exectution is mediocre and only the character of Oona Laurence is somewhat decent. Compared to Hubbie Halloween this is a masterpiece, however. But it doesnt deserve the thoughts of franchise that the cliffhanger indicates.

I see people are being harsh about this film but they need to remember that its aimed at children. There are a few kids films that got bad reviews back in the day like Hocus Pocus or scooby doo spooky island which nearly every child loved but since its adults doing reviews they got bad ones. We need to think of the target audience and i think that children would really love this film its fun and for them a little spooky which they will like. Tom Felton is was the stand out in the film , his acting was superb as always

This is great fun, we're Brits in our 40s no kids and whacked it on and thoroughly enjoyed it. Tom Felton, as normal, steals every moment he's on screen - this guy should be getting bigger roles. This film is fun, feels like one of the lesser 80s films and the actors really run with it. Even the kid playing Jacob isn't the normal precocious American brat you want to get eaten! What a great idea that was. American casting agents take note. Its not perfect, but certainly worth your time.

Rachel Talalay showcases her great eye for a shot here with a strong & inventive direction - coupled by Gregory Middleton's impressive cinematography (heavily influenced by Netflix's other project, "Stranger Things") which together, does culminate to form a visually cohesive & competent film... But nothing can save the movie from the dire writing & hammy performances - which prevent it from being anything other than an adequately made, substandard mess.

Forcing abvious PC messages instantly destroys a movie. You are trying to escape reailty. Especially with a fantasy movie.

So I've seen stupid TV show and movies, but this is definitely the most unprecedented the dumbest I've seen. It is difficult to compete with this kind of idiocy!

I had never heard about this 2020 movie "A Babysitter's Guide to Monster Hunting" prior to sitting down to watch it here in 2024, and thus of course I opted to watch the movie since I had not seen it before. Sure, I wasn't harboring the biggest of expectations to the movie, as it seemed to be a movie aimed at a young audience. But still, I gave director Rachel Talalay and writer Joe Ballarini's movie a fair chance.

It was a actually a rather thoroughly made movie, in terms of storyline, props, concept idea, etc. Lots of nice details in the movie, which I found to be rather surprising.

I was not familiar with a single fact on the screen. So the actors and actresses were all new talents for me, and that is actually something I do enjoy when I sit down to watch movies. And I will say that the acting performances in the movie were fair.

Visually, then I will say that "A Babysitter's Guide to Monster Hunting" was actually okay. Sure, it was effects that were mostly funny and sort of cute in a way, as it was a movie aimed at the younger audience. The CGI animated monsters were not scary, so a younger audience can also sit down and enjoy the movie, no doubt about that.

This movie is actually something that is suitable for the entire family, even with younger children as well. And while I did manage to sit through the entire movie, this is hardly a movie that I will return to again, as I have no small children in my family.

My rating of "A Babysitter's Guide to Monster Hunting" lands on a six out of ten stars.

..and it sucks. Terrible acting, terrible writing. Terrible everything. There are a lot of good children movies out there but this one is just bad. Saying Tom Felton's acting was superb is astonishing to say the least. I can enjoy a good children movie but there is absolutely nothing enjoyable about this one. Nothing.

Adults - Relax, Get some popcorn, and Grab a drink! Teens - You're too Cool for this movie, but will probably like the girls! Kids - This will probably become one of your favorite movies of the season!

Yes, Would Recommend This Movie!

2 out of 5 stars.

Babysitters Guide to Monster Hunting is a family fantasy film that kids will be entertained with this while the adults may find it a snoozefest. The plot is weird about a babysitters group who work underground to hunting monsters that try to give kids bad dreams or stalking kids at night. The direction and acting is cheesy. Cheesy dialogue. It feels like something you may catch on a saturday morning on a nickolodeon channel. The visual effects are cheap. The performances are eh.

Adults may want to skip this one. While the humor is aiming for the younger audiences.

First things first: Tom Felton shines in his role! Also I appreciate them making a movie about a diverse team of kids solving problems as a team using their knowledge in different areas of science. Great if you watch it with kids, since it's a joyride for everyone. Got a few scares and a lot of laughs out of me!

Great movie for the little ones! If my 4 year old sits and watches the entire movie, then it's a success! I enjoyed it as well.

The movie was good up until the monsters revealed themselves then it became a stupid terribly bad comedy.

The characters sucked. The mom was an immature B word.

Scary? More like Stupidity.

I thought this movie could compete with Goosebumps. Apparently not.

Verdict: if you like this...then you need a babysitter.

This movie is how I learned I could set Netflix to play at 1.5x speed. They hyped it by citing Tom Felton's appearance - he may have 15 minutes' screen time. Maybe. And then of course they put so much makeup and facial prosthetics on him that he's unrecognizable. The first few minutes of his appearance had me thinking, "Hmm. Michael Keaton did it better in Beetlejuice," though it did get better from there. The rest of the cast, and the storyline, were bland at best. I get that it's a kids' movie - but it's a boring kids' movie.

There is no parents guide on this page, so we thought we would leave a review. This movie has a character take the name of God in vain, for those of us who are sensitive to religious exclamations.0.