Recensioni degli utenti

I'm not certain the other reviewer (or at least a person who commented) on this film actually watched the video. The comment so far removed from reality I can only assume this was the rambling of someone who feels ashamed of what the US military did to the people of Hiroshima (and Nagasaki, for that matter).

This is one of the only historically true documentaries on this horrible event that doesn't include images of US bodies washed-up on some island - in an attempt to justify killing all those tens of thousands of civilians in the name of "saving US lives".

This documentary is horrible. The images are disturbing. But this documentary is real - which makes it all the more disturbing.

Provided a different perspective that was thought-provoking and heartfelt, so sad. Anyone complaining this is anti-American propaganda should consider putting their ego aside and have some empathy to real victims from this event, we cannot deny the damage this did. Great documentary.

This documentary definitely wasn't put together with objective reporting being the goal. There were many half truths, distortions, and outright lies. The writer and director Lucy van Beek definitely had an agenda that wasn't related to being an unbiased historian. If you are looking for a documentary on Hiroshima that at least attempts to be fair and balanced, bypass this one.

This is garbage. Its the definition of revisionist history. Its like they went through all the historic documents and picked the ones that fit their anti-American agenda.

Any responsible WW2 historian should be dismayed. The truth was that the bombs was the only option, and it ultimately served the purpose of showing the world how futile nuclear warfare was. As a result, there hasn't been a major was since.

This is a filthy lie.

Claims to be "The Real History" and then proceeds to consider no other viewpoint but their own. This would have been better framed as "another side of the story."

I join the many reviewers who say this film is garbage. This film has driven me to attempt a review - so few of mine are published. One reviewer rejects the idea of the German atomic project helping the American one. He is right it didnt. Good review of the Nazi nuclear project by David Irving 1967 The Virus House. ( The later neo-Fascist).

I recommend this film as the data presented is good and some fresh. The way it is turned into information is not suspect, it is wrong. See above.

It is instructive for someone interested and with background knowledge to see how the data is distorted.

There are only two photographs of Hiroshima, immediately after. They identified and interviewed him. Then they failed to stress his photos were the only ones as the scientific plane 'failed'. This would have been a good entry for the lost neutron flux measurements. The neutron meter was lost for 50 y. It was later found in someone's garage and they assessed it as little better than a watering or jerry can. 'Lost' because they knew the data generated was useless.

Memories of what happened today are different to those memories of things that happened 50 y ago. This seemed very obvious when listening to the eye witnesses.

Contemporaries I agree, said " Dont go to Hiroshima, there's nothing there", unlike the ruins of Berlin or London. However, most of the concrete buildings survived upright, and so the massive spaces in between were burnt out wooden stock. These had been cleared by the time the Americans landed in Sep 1945. ( dumped in the river) So the timing of the photographs are vital. There were a few of the 'lost photographs'. A Japanese photographer went out within minutes and photographed the chaos and then regretted photographing so many who were dead or would die. However they show the scene after the bomb and before the firestorm.

A secret monitoring committee has identified the special purpose of Enola Gay and its group - and gathered information and passed it on. Nothing happened. Enola Gay was identified in flight but not shot down, inexplicably. No, the explanation was that Japan had no air defence by that time.

The standard view is "All communication with Hiroshima ceased at 0815". This was due to the unknown Electro Magnetic Pulse. They decided to send someone to see, but it would take 3 days to get down there owing to American bombing. A secret committee knew the secret but told no one, is less credible

The account of the Cabinet meeting where the Emperor breaks the dead lock is completely wrong. Other things happend.

This so-called documentary is a completely biased, revisionist account of the decision and mission to use the first atomic weapon on Japan. The narrative implies that Japan was going to surrender anyway but the Americans ignored their peace feelers to that the bomb could be used in action. What rubbish. If they were going to surrender, then they should have surrendered before the bomb could be dropped.

What particularly galls me are the scientists who worked on the Manhattan Project and have since spoken out against the use of the bomb. They were completely happy eating their government-issued roast beef and lamb and ice cream at Los Alamos, and they took their paychecks for working on the bomb from the U.S. government with pleasure, and now they have the nerve to play holier than thou? The old scientist in the film that hinted he should have sabotaged the bomb should be charged with treason.

Don't watch this film, unless you want to be either angered or entertained by the anti-American, ham-fisted, bleeding-heart propaganda.

P.S. Spoiler alert. The Japanese started the war, and the U.S. won it, in part thanks to the bomb.

Where the HELL did they FIND that the German-Nazis where researching Atomic Bomb Manufacture + that they WERE stockpiling URANIUM (ore) in vats ... while concentrating their 'imports' on "" Heavy Water "" from (occupied) Norway ... ? !

Lucy Vanbeek is a pathetic 'spreader' of far-out U. S. theories ... NO HISTORY here : where is (the) ATLANTIS again ... with the DINOSAURS we expect , just before the (?) FLOOD, right ? ...