Seguite il terzo capitolo del franchise "Now You See Me".Seguite il terzo capitolo del franchise "Now You See Me".Seguite il terzo capitolo del franchise "Now You See Me".
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 candidatura in totale
- $50,000 Bucks Audience Member
- (as Angela Stander)
Riepilogo
Recensioni in evidenza
While the second movie was already inferior to the first, at least it expanded the world and took the story in a new direction. With nine years to develop a sequel, you'd expect something fresh, ambitious, and worthy of the franchise. Instead, the filmmakers went for the laziest option possible: a blatant rehash of the first two films-especially the second-recycling the same story beats, structure, and even the same type of plot twist, just with different characters.
The movie is full of overused tropes executed in the most uninteresting way. The dialogue is poor, character interactions even poorer, and the new characters add nothing except clutter, stealing screen time from the main cast-who end up feeling like guests in their own franchise. Even the visuals feel tired and uninspired, which is especially disappointing given the potential of such a unique premise and the always-wonderful cast. With these characters and this setup, the film could have delivered inventive storytelling and striking set pieces-but it doesn't.
A fourth movie is teased, and if it ever happens, I sincerely hope they hire a writer and director interested in making the sequel this franchise actually deserves.
This type of heist film is better when we have a small team of 4 doing a mission impossible / hustle / leverage type double movie-length episode.
I know Atlas by name, the other 9 I have no idea what there names were.
Less of the CGI camera tricks. More focus on actual real world tricks and using them to solve crime.
And keep the budget low. We don't need expensive race cars (with an ending that is resolved off screen, when the character just turns up. No explanation given). No home alone optical illusion museum to set things in. It was just stupid.
Seriously too much money was spent on the sets, when a tighter more-focused script was what is needed.
It's watchable and at least they vanished a silk in a TT. They explained how the diamond was switched out. As stupid as that was (same as the car stealing scene). Security around a billion pound diamond was laughable. Even more so when the twist at the end is revealed and you realise how pointless the rest of the movie was.
The new magicians lack depth... their skills and personalities aren't well-established, so it's hard to care. The original Horsemen (all five now) are still charismatic, but their roles feel sidelined in favor of underdeveloped newcomers.
The final heist is visually impressive but lacks the satisfying payoff of the first two films. The twists feel forced, and the revenge-driven plot drags down the fun.
That said, it's not a bad movie - just a missed opportunity. If you loved the first two, you'll find enough spectacle to enjoy, but don't expect the same magic.
6/10: A decent weekend watch, but nothing more.
The whole movie is around 10 people bickering. It is exhausting to watch and listen to. This movie is definitely for a younger generation than the last as this sort of constant barrage of verbal intercourse reminds me more of college kids bantering than anything else.
So, regardless of that its okay. Nice to see the band back together. Nothing going to set the world alight here just okay.
We do end up with what feels like the 10 horsemen but feel free to disagree.
I did enjoy the cast reunion - Isla Fisher back in action was a pleasant surprise but beyond that, everything was just... plain. If you're going to make fans wait nearly a decade, at least give us something worth the wait, not a rerun in a new hat.
The only illusion here is thinking this sequel was worth the wait.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizWhen Veronika enters her secret caveau we can see a painting held there: that's Caravaggio's "Nativity", stolen in Palermo, Italy in 1969, and never retrieved.
- BlooperAt 1:30 during the sand trap escape, all the water empties from the sand trap through the broken glass wall, and all the sand in the trap is no longer there.
- Citazioni
Charlie: How did you... find us?
J. Daniel Atlas: I don't know, took me about... 30 seconds And if it was this easy for me to find you, how hard would it be for the police?
June: Whoa, hold on, the police?
J. Daniel Atlas: Yeah, the police.
Bosco: Why would the police be looking for us?
J. Daniel Atlas: Uh, I don't know, what about that little heist you just pulled? Or... the fact that you're squatting in this place, so that your electricity comes from the circuit box in the corner, I don't know, could be anything, am I right, Bozo?
Bosco: [chuckles] Bosco. Bosco Leroy.
J. Daniel Atlas: [chuckles] Oh yes that's right, Bosco Leroy. What, did you type "fictional magician name" into ChatGPT?
Bosco: No, that's actually my real name, Atlas. What'd your mom have sex with a map?
- ConnessioniFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Must Watch Movies and Shows of November 2025 (2025)
- Colonne sonoreCrusades
Written by Max Bassin, Dominic DiGesu, Emily Green (as Gus Green), Foster Hudson and Cameron Winter
Performed by Geese
Courtesy of Partisan Records/PIAS
I più visti
The Year in Posters
The Year in Posters
- How long is Now You See Me: Now You Don't?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Phi Vụ Thế Kỷ: Thoắt Ẩn Thoắt Hiện
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Belgio(Exterior)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 90.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 61.719.268 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 21.013.793 USD
- 16 nov 2025
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 216.541.395 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 53min(113 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.39 : 1







