VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,0/10
1327
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA show featuring parodies of current events, commentary on significant issues and interviews with newsmakers, culture critics and media personalities.A show featuring parodies of current events, commentary on significant issues and interviews with newsmakers, culture critics and media personalities.A show featuring parodies of current events, commentary on significant issues and interviews with newsmakers, culture critics and media personalities.
Sfoglia gli episodi
Recensioni in evidenza
When I first saw Tyrus on your show he reminded me of Garfield...please green room him as Garfield and put a woman Garfield behind him beside him on him n don't let him know.
What a waste of talent. I enjoyed Gutfeld on "Red Eye;" I enjoy watching him on "The Five" and think that he is the most reasoned and intelligent member of that cast. I have read and enjoyed several of his books.
This show was a stinker. I can only hope that Fox will shred this format and start over again, or just sink it completely and find something else for Gutfeld to do before his career crashes (again.) He is not helping Joanne Nosuchinsky's career either. She is clever and witty on Red Eye, and I suspect pretty bright since she seemed to do some of the writing for that show. She was attractive as always, but not shown to good advantage in this show. ------TIME PASSES------
The show has been on for awhile, and some changes have been made. I have raised my vote to a 5, because there have been improvements. The show still is incredibly uneven; the Liberal Panel is stupid and a poor imitation of the newspaper on Red Eye, mostly because Bill Schulz isn't behind it. Gutfeld needed more people on the show, but it still is, or appears to be, too scripted. Gutfeld has the dubious distinction of ruining two shows, Red Eye by leaving, and this show by arriving. Joanne, look for something more deserving of your talent. -------TIME PASSES--------
Okay, I have kept watching; more changes have been made to the format, and I have raised my vote to 7 (I would go for 7 ½, if I could.) There are more guests, sometimes too many, and not always used to good advantage, and the last few episodes have had a live audience. I think having that reaction might be helping. The show has improved a great deal, but there still is room for improvement, as with most things. Getting better all the time, and I am hopeful, even optimistic.
This show was a stinker. I can only hope that Fox will shred this format and start over again, or just sink it completely and find something else for Gutfeld to do before his career crashes (again.) He is not helping Joanne Nosuchinsky's career either. She is clever and witty on Red Eye, and I suspect pretty bright since she seemed to do some of the writing for that show. She was attractive as always, but not shown to good advantage in this show. ------TIME PASSES------
The show has been on for awhile, and some changes have been made. I have raised my vote to a 5, because there have been improvements. The show still is incredibly uneven; the Liberal Panel is stupid and a poor imitation of the newspaper on Red Eye, mostly because Bill Schulz isn't behind it. Gutfeld needed more people on the show, but it still is, or appears to be, too scripted. Gutfeld has the dubious distinction of ruining two shows, Red Eye by leaving, and this show by arriving. Joanne, look for something more deserving of your talent. -------TIME PASSES--------
Okay, I have kept watching; more changes have been made to the format, and I have raised my vote to 7 (I would go for 7 ½, if I could.) There are more guests, sometimes too many, and not always used to good advantage, and the last few episodes have had a live audience. I think having that reaction might be helping. The show has improved a great deal, but there still is room for improvement, as with most things. Getting better all the time, and I am hopeful, even optimistic.
Good or bad I like honest news and the main stream news networks like CNN have become so fake and incorrect today. Fox News Channel is one of the only channels serving factual news and Gutfeld is a nice fun spin on this factual news. If you want to be spoon fed lies do not watch Fox News Channel.
Yes, the skits are bad, but that is the point. They're delivered tongue-in-cheek, and no one on the panel is allowed to take themselves too seriously. Compare to Colbert's cringeworthy song and dance propaganda numbers. It's nice to see a conservative voice in the late night sphere. I also really like the format, with four guests per night, and an entire stable of personalities to occupy the other seats.
Loved it. Kayleigh and Dave Rubin are smart and funny. The real-time reviews by Tucker, Dana Perino, and especially Kilmeade were apt: less Greg, more guests. Greg has some pearls but most of his comments are juvenile. He needs to self-edit better. Love Tyrus' realness and Kat's smart and funny nuggets of wisdom.
The skits are hit or miss. Should hire the comics from Babylon Bee.
The skits are hit or miss. Should hire the comics from Babylon Bee.
Lo sapevi?
- ConnessioniFeatured in Mark Latham's Outsiders: Episodio #1.7 (2017)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How many seasons does Gutfeld! have?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Gutfeld!
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti