Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaLiving in her family's secluded mansion, Audrina is kept alone and out of sight and is haunted by nightmares of her older sister, First Audrina, who was left for dead in the woods after an a... Leggi tuttoLiving in her family's secluded mansion, Audrina is kept alone and out of sight and is haunted by nightmares of her older sister, First Audrina, who was left for dead in the woods after an attack. As she begins to question her past and her disturbing dreams, the grim truth is slo... Leggi tuttoLiving in her family's secluded mansion, Audrina is kept alone and out of sight and is haunted by nightmares of her older sister, First Audrina, who was left for dead in the woods after an attack. As she begins to question her past and her disturbing dreams, the grim truth is slowly revealed.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 2 vittorie e 1 candidatura in totale
- Lucietta Adare
- (as Kirsten Robek)
Recensioni in evidenza
The above set-up really doesn't make much sense. However, the situations do become clear, by the end of the story. It's not a bad story, but what this TV movie does is show us the highlights in long family mystery. Unfortunately, events just happen. There is little attempt to build a mystery or piece them together. We are shown, not guided or told. The emphasis is clearly on sex fantasies. Apparently, this is the main thrust (sorry) of the assignment given director Mike Rohl and his crew. The performances are all highly sexualized. You don't see much sex, by the way, since this movie is geared toward foreplay and fantasy. The problem is... the story really wasn't about sex. The violent incident triggering the drama, and its repercussions, are lost in the mix. The best you can say that is everyone looks sexy and the photography, by James Liston, is outstanding.
**** My Sweet Audrina (2016-01-09) Mike Rohl ~ India Eisley, William Moseley, James Tupper, Tess Atkins
This starts off like a moody horror movie. In the end, it's only a spooky mystery. Kacey Rohl should have stayed as Vera. The change in Audrina actresses is acceptable and Arden is inevitable. Rohl could easily play all the different ages. India Eisley has the innocent fragility and beauty for the part. Her speaking voice does mumble her lines sometimes which isn't the greatest for a lead. The middle is a lot of slow rambling sexual melodrama. It's somewhat aimless. It needs a direction and the simplest is Audrina researching her namesake predecessor. By the end, the reveal doesn't satisfy as much as releases the movie from its expectations.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizMajor differences from the book include the removal of two major characters. Sylvia, Audrina's younger sister, who is born with an unnamed but significant neurological disorder; and Billie, Arden's mother, a double amputee who becomes involved with Audrina's father for a time before dying the exact same way Ellsbeth did. Another major change is that in the novel, Vera has brittle-bone disease and breaks her bones so often and easily that one of her legs grows shorter than the other. This, of course, contributes to her broken leg and the resulting fall at the end.
- BlooperWhen Audrina runs out of the piano teacher's house, the interior shot shows the front door swinging inward/open. When it cuts to the exterior shot, the door is swinging closed.
- Citazioni
Audrina Adare: [Yelling] It's like I'm already dead! This house is my coffin!