VALUTAZIONE IMDb
2,7/10
3714
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un enorme squalo a tre teste si aggira tra gli oceani nutrendosi di carne umana e rifiuti. Max (Danny Trejo) e Stanley (Rob Van Dam), due ricercatori, studiano una strategia per di riportare... Leggi tuttoUn enorme squalo a tre teste si aggira tra gli oceani nutrendosi di carne umana e rifiuti. Max (Danny Trejo) e Stanley (Rob Van Dam), due ricercatori, studiano una strategia per di riportare l'ordine ed abbattere il terrore! Ce la faranno?Un enorme squalo a tre teste si aggira tra gli oceani nutrendosi di carne umana e rifiuti. Max (Danny Trejo) e Stanley (Rob Van Dam), due ricercatori, studiano una strategia per di riportare l'ordine ed abbattere il terrore! Ce la faranno?
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Scott Thomas Reynolds
- Ryan
- (as Scott Reynolds)
Steve Norris
- Steve
- (as Stephen Norris)
Recensioni in evidenza
I am a fan of B-movies and appreciate the humor in them. They are aware of the audiences expectations and delivers.
But this movie really tries to be a real movie. My expectations were very low and only wanted a bit of brainless entertainment. But the brain could not relax with all these unnecessary flaws. Going full speed and barely make any waves. Badly broken things are suddenly whole again. Using the same cut scene over and over and ... again. At least some laws of physics?
I seldom regret watching a movie but this one can with good continence be skipped. It only makes you feel bad that you gave it a chance.
All though Danny Trejo saves it a little it's way below par for B-movies.
Let it slip by you unwatched.
But this movie really tries to be a real movie. My expectations were very low and only wanted a bit of brainless entertainment. But the brain could not relax with all these unnecessary flaws. Going full speed and barely make any waves. Badly broken things are suddenly whole again. Using the same cut scene over and over and ... again. At least some laws of physics?
I seldom regret watching a movie but this one can with good continence be skipped. It only makes you feel bad that you gave it a chance.
All though Danny Trejo saves it a little it's way below par for B-movies.
Let it slip by you unwatched.
A giant mutated three headed shark is roaming the ocean and eating people. Porn star Jazy Berlin is the first vicitm and the shark got angry after chewing on her silicone breasts.
However despite the size of the shark and its three heads, people just keep going into the water especially now the shark is after a cruise ship to devour.
Asylum have managed to produce a decent CGI shark. The story is drab.
However despite the size of the shark and its three heads, people just keep going into the water especially now the shark is after a cruise ship to devour.
Asylum have managed to produce a decent CGI shark. The story is drab.
While I didn't think much at all of 2-Headed Shark Attack, this was worse. The former at least tried to be fun (although the cheapness and ineptitude of it all got in the way) and had one cast member who tried, but 3-Headed Shark Attack takes itself too seriously, as well as being so stupid and being unoriginal in doing so, with next to nothing that makes it stand out from other shark movies (apart from with the shark) and wastes the talent it has.
3-Headed Shark Attack is by far the worst looking of the SyFy shark movies aired this year. Any nice scenery that the movie has is difficult to appreciate when the movie is shot in such a drab way and when it's edited so amateurishly that bacon-slicer-like editing looks more refined. Worst of all in this regard are the effects, as it was made on low-budget it would have been forgiven a little if it was not great, but when the effects for the shark look as if no effort was given in making them without looking so goofy and unfinished-looking that is hard to ignore, the only thing that it has that's superior for that of 2-Headed Shark Attack is that the size is more consistent. So is the shark's lack of presence or personality, it's not menacing, it's not scary and it's not fun, it's not even strong enough to bring any unintentional humour or goofiness, that's how bland it is. Music is very generic and adds very little, it's not always appropriate either.
The movie's writing ranges between incredibly bad to appalling, with the exception of two dark comedy moments with the head inside the shark and the boy riding the shark as if skiing, and they only raised a mild chuckle and like they were lifted right out of other shark movies (the latter being a little like in Sharknado 2). Any comedy is incredibly forced and is so cheesy it is enough to make the eyes roll in disbelief, while the more serious moments are very awkwardly written and as trite as anybody can possibly go. The attacks are far too rushed, lack any kind of suspense and the over-silliness to the point of intelligence-insulting stupidity, terrible shark effects, bad editing and even more gratuitous gore further cheapen them. To describe the story as weak is being too insulting to the word weak, it is a very lethargically paced and thin as ice story with lots of padding that is either badly written or serves no point at all to the movie, other than attempts at novelty value, which falls flat on its face because it all feels so tired. It is not fun, it is not scary and it is not thrilling or suspenseful, it's just nothing but tired stupidity.
As for the characters, that they're tired clichés isn't so much a problem, the problem is that they are either obnoxious with them constantly doing stupid things, so bland that it makes zombies seem more animated or both. Some of them are superfluous to the story or come and go out of nowhere constantly. The direction is as flat as a pancake, and the acting is awful with the unforgivable waste of Danny Trejo being one of the movie's biggest offences. Trejo, no matter how hard he tries, has nothing to work with with none of his material playing to his strengths as a performer, and he over-compensates as a result, for someone like Trejo who has a knack for raising a lot of bad movies up a notch it's shameful. Everybody else either overacts painfully or are amateurishly bland.
In summary, despite the small bit of originality with the shark 3-Headed Shark Attack is a dreadful movie all round and near-indefensible. 1/10 Bethany Cox
3-Headed Shark Attack is by far the worst looking of the SyFy shark movies aired this year. Any nice scenery that the movie has is difficult to appreciate when the movie is shot in such a drab way and when it's edited so amateurishly that bacon-slicer-like editing looks more refined. Worst of all in this regard are the effects, as it was made on low-budget it would have been forgiven a little if it was not great, but when the effects for the shark look as if no effort was given in making them without looking so goofy and unfinished-looking that is hard to ignore, the only thing that it has that's superior for that of 2-Headed Shark Attack is that the size is more consistent. So is the shark's lack of presence or personality, it's not menacing, it's not scary and it's not fun, it's not even strong enough to bring any unintentional humour or goofiness, that's how bland it is. Music is very generic and adds very little, it's not always appropriate either.
The movie's writing ranges between incredibly bad to appalling, with the exception of two dark comedy moments with the head inside the shark and the boy riding the shark as if skiing, and they only raised a mild chuckle and like they were lifted right out of other shark movies (the latter being a little like in Sharknado 2). Any comedy is incredibly forced and is so cheesy it is enough to make the eyes roll in disbelief, while the more serious moments are very awkwardly written and as trite as anybody can possibly go. The attacks are far too rushed, lack any kind of suspense and the over-silliness to the point of intelligence-insulting stupidity, terrible shark effects, bad editing and even more gratuitous gore further cheapen them. To describe the story as weak is being too insulting to the word weak, it is a very lethargically paced and thin as ice story with lots of padding that is either badly written or serves no point at all to the movie, other than attempts at novelty value, which falls flat on its face because it all feels so tired. It is not fun, it is not scary and it is not thrilling or suspenseful, it's just nothing but tired stupidity.
As for the characters, that they're tired clichés isn't so much a problem, the problem is that they are either obnoxious with them constantly doing stupid things, so bland that it makes zombies seem more animated or both. Some of them are superfluous to the story or come and go out of nowhere constantly. The direction is as flat as a pancake, and the acting is awful with the unforgivable waste of Danny Trejo being one of the movie's biggest offences. Trejo, no matter how hard he tries, has nothing to work with with none of his material playing to his strengths as a performer, and he over-compensates as a result, for someone like Trejo who has a knack for raising a lot of bad movies up a notch it's shameful. Everybody else either overacts painfully or are amateurishly bland.
In summary, despite the small bit of originality with the shark 3-Headed Shark Attack is a dreadful movie all round and near-indefensible. 1/10 Bethany Cox
A crystal clear example of how not to make a movie and a proof they all chose a wrong job
Now I have not watched the first one yet (which has a two headed shark), but I can imagine how ... crazy it must be. This can be taken as an example of how not to do certain things ... in editing for example. The reaction shots to things happening are awful ... you could argue that the actors are not up for it, but maybe it is not their fault.
Anyway, Trejo gives it his all, when he can be seen, there was no nudity (which is surprising considering this would be a selling point, not that it would make the movie "better", but there was also an Axe scene that Sharknado probably is jealous of ... not that they were able to milk much out of it (again reaction shots ;) ) ... anyway, I've seen worse movies .. I'm guessing the sequels might get in that list if I ever see them.
Anyway, Trejo gives it his all, when he can be seen, there was no nudity (which is surprising considering this would be a selling point, not that it would make the movie "better", but there was also an Axe scene that Sharknado probably is jealous of ... not that they were able to milk much out of it (again reaction shots ;) ) ... anyway, I've seen worse movies .. I'm guessing the sequels might get in that list if I ever see them.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizBurns take the gun and starts to shoot the shark. After a couple of seconds he take the same gun, again, (it looks as the same shot as before) but the scene ends abruptly.
- BlooperWhen the survivors are jumping off the boat to escape to the party island, you can see someone sitting in the driver's area of the boat.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Sharknado 3: Attacco alla casa bianca (2015)
- Colonne sonoreBoyfriend
Written by Jayk Gallagher, Rachel G. Fox, Henrick Olson, and Scott Gettlin
Performed by Hobart W. Fink
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- Cá Mập 3 Đầu
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 29 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti